Click the case name for better results:

Stanley and Another (As The Joint Liquidators of New Grass of Manchester Ltd) v TMK Finance Ltd and Another: ChD 21 Dec 2010

The liquidators sought relief saying that the company had sold its principle capital asset at an undervalue to its parent company. Judges: Richards J Citations: [2010] EWHC 3349 (Ch), [2011] BPIR 876, [2011] Bus LR D93 Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 238 241 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Insolvency Updated: 21 October 2022; Ref: scu.427408

4Eng Ltd v Harper and Others: ChD 26 Oct 2009

The claimant sought to set aside transactions entered into by the defendants which, it said were intended fraudulently to defeat claims by their creditors. Held: When considering the extent of recovery available under the sections of the 1986 Act, the court should consider general principles applicable in all areas of law. The Act did not … Continue reading 4Eng Ltd v Harper and Others: ChD 26 Oct 2009

Ram v Ram and others: CA 16 Nov 2004

Citations: [2004] EWCA Civ 1684, [2005] 2 FLR 63 Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 423 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Akhter and Another CA 14-Feb-2020 Islamic Nikah Ceremony did not create a marriage The parties had undertaken, in 1998, an Islamic marriage ceremony, a Nikah. They … Continue reading Ram v Ram and others: CA 16 Nov 2004

AB Agri Ltd v Curtis and Others: Misc 22 Jul 2016

(Leeds County Court) The creditor sought to have a proof admitted for pounds 479k, but the chair admitted it only for pounds 1.00, and the IVA proposal was accepted again the wishes of the creditor. The creditor said that the IP had misunderstood the claim and should have treated it as liquidated. The chair responded … Continue reading AB Agri Ltd v Curtis and Others: Misc 22 Jul 2016

BTI 2014 Llc v Sequana SA and Others: CA 6 Feb 2019

The Court considered a Director’s duty to act in the interests of his company’s creditors. The Directors were said to have paid out an excessive dividend to put assets beyond the reach of its creditors. Judges: Longmore, David Richards, Henderson LJJ Citations: [2019] EWCA Civ 112, [2019] 2 All ER (Comm) 13, [2019] BCC 631, … Continue reading BTI 2014 Llc v Sequana SA and Others: CA 6 Feb 2019

Lehman Brothers International (Europe), Re: SC 29 Feb 2012

The court was asked to interpret the provisions as to ‘client money rules’ and ‘client money distribution rules’ in the FSA handbook, and to consider the consequences as to the applicable trusts. Substantial sums paid by clients to the bank before its insolvency were now unavailable. Held: The appeal failed. The statutory trust under the … Continue reading Lehman Brothers International (Europe), Re: SC 29 Feb 2012

The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Goldberg, Mcavoy: ChD 26 Nov 2003

The Secretary of State sought a disqualification order. The director argued that one shoul not be made in the absence of some breach of legal duty, some dishonesty should be shown. Held: The answer was a mixture of fact and law. A breach of duty alone was neither necessary nor sufficient. Unfitness by reason of … Continue reading The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Goldberg, Mcavoy: ChD 26 Nov 2003

Wendy Fair (Heritage) Ltd v Hobday and Another: ChD 27 Mar 2006

Application for contribution from directors after they had traded beyond the time when any prospect of avoiding insolvent liquidation was lost. Judges: The Honourable Mr Justice Peter Smith Citations: [2006] EWHC 5803 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 214 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Insolvency, Company Updated: 29 September 2022; Ref: scu.241457

Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Paulin: ChD 13 May 2005

The director sought to appeal an order disqualifying him form acting as a company director. Held: The disqualification proceedings were properly charactised as insolvency proceedings and therefore there was no requirement for permission to appeal to a high court judge. Judges: Morritt Citations: [2005] EWHC 888 (Ch), Times 26-May-2005 Links: Bailii Statutes: Company Directors Disqualification … Continue reading Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Paulin: ChD 13 May 2005

Macaria Investments Ltd v Sanders and Another: ChD 17 Dec 2010

Application under section 6 of the Insolvency Act 1986 for an order that the approval of a Company Voluntary Arrangement in respect of the second respondent given by a meeting of creditors be revoked on the grounds that there was material irregularity in relation to that meeting. Judges: Roth J Citations: [2010] EWHC 3353 (Ch), … Continue reading Macaria Investments Ltd v Sanders and Another: ChD 17 Dec 2010

Collier v P and M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd: CA 14 Dec 2007

Agreement for payment by joint debtor not contract The claimant appealed against refusal of an order to set aside a statutory demand. He said that he had compromised a claim by the creditors. He argued for an extension to the Rule in Pinnel’s case, so that where a debtor agrees to pay part of a … Continue reading Collier v P and M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd: CA 14 Dec 2007

It’s A Wrap (UK) Ltd v Gula and Another: ChD 16 Sep 2005

The defendant company directors were accused of having paid dividends to themselves when the company was in fact making a loss. Held: A claim might lie, but the pleadings did not phrase it adequately, and an amendment would be improper. Though payments had been made at a time when the company ws making losses, a … Continue reading It’s A Wrap (UK) Ltd v Gula and Another: ChD 16 Sep 2005

Bloom and Others v The Pensions Regulator and Others; In re Nortel GMBH (in administration: CA 14 Oct 2011

‘These appeals raise important and difficult questions posed by the impact of legislation for the protection of pension funds upon companies which are undergoing an insolvency process.’ Judges: Laws, Lloyd, Rimer LJJ Citations: [2011] EWCA Civ 1124, [2012] BCC 83, [2012] 1 BCLC 248, [2012] BCLC 248, [2012] 1 All ER 1455, [2012] Bus LR … Continue reading Bloom and Others v The Pensions Regulator and Others; In re Nortel GMBH (in administration: CA 14 Oct 2011

Revenue and Customs v Rochdale Drinks Distributors Ltd: CA 13 Oct 2011

The revenue appealed against refusal of its petition for the winding up of the company for non-payment of a VAT assessment. The company said that the assessment was disputed. The revenue said that the company had been run for the purpose of submitting false VAT Input tax claims, and suppressing Output tax invoices. Held: The … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v Rochdale Drinks Distributors Ltd: CA 13 Oct 2011

Kapoor v National Westminster Bank Plc and Another: CA 5 Oct 2011

This appeal concerned two issues of principle relating to the approval of an individual voluntary arrangement. One was as to whether, where there has been an assignment of part of a debt, which can only take effect in equity, the person entitled to vote at the creditors’ meeting called to approve the IVA was the … Continue reading Kapoor v National Westminster Bank Plc and Another: CA 5 Oct 2011

Gita Ram v Baskinder Ram,Solinder Ram, Monder Ram and Maurice William Russell: CA 5 Nov 2004

A bankrupt had, before his bankruptcy disposed of his share in a house at an undervalue. His wife appealed an order that the share disposed of should vest entirely in the trustee in bankruptcy. Matrimonial proceedings had also been commenced. Held: The wife was seeking effectively not re-instatement, but the creation of a position which … Continue reading Gita Ram v Baskinder Ram,Solinder Ram, Monder Ram and Maurice William Russell: CA 5 Nov 2004

Morphitis v Bernasconi and others: CA 5 Mar 2003

The appellants had been directors of a company which fell into difficulties. A new company was begun, and traded, and the other continued for a year before being wound up by a landlord. The lease was disclaimed. Only the landlord lost out. He claimed that the directors had continued to trade with intent to defraud. … Continue reading Morphitis v Bernasconi and others: CA 5 Mar 2003

In the Matter of Pectel Limited; O’Neill; O’Neill v Phillips; Phillips and Pectel Limited: CA 1 May 1997

The petitioners sought either the purchase of their shares, or the winding up of the company alleging unfair prejudice in the management of the company. The defendants argued that what was complained of did not fall within section 459 since it was not complained of in their capacity as shareholders. Held: Though the petitioner was … Continue reading In the Matter of Pectel Limited; O’Neill; O’Neill v Phillips; Phillips and Pectel Limited: CA 1 May 1997

Seager, Regina v; Regina v Blatch: CACD 26 Jun 2009

The court considered how to determine in the context of applications for confiscation orders, the value of the ‘benefit’ obtained by an offender who has been guilty of managing a company as a director in contravention of a director’s disqualification order or an undertaking not to act as a director. Held: The values were to … Continue reading Seager, Regina v; Regina v Blatch: CACD 26 Jun 2009

In re Saunders (A Bankrupt): ChD 1997

Very emphatic language was required in a statute before want of leave should, without more, result in proceedings being treated as a nullity. Leave could in appropriate circumstances be granted after the event notwithstanding the proceedings had been commenced without leave. The words used in s.130(2) of the Insolvency Act 1986 were, in their historical … Continue reading In re Saunders (A Bankrupt): ChD 1997

Sigma Finance Corporation, Re; (in administrative receivership): SC 29 Oct 2009

The court considered how the losses of the insolvent company were to be distributed as between secured creditors and preferential creditors, given the terms of the applicable trust deed. Held: The court considered the interpretations of the deed, looking at the ‘landscape of the instrument as a whole’ and interpretations given. The Court emphasised the … Continue reading Sigma Finance Corporation, Re; (in administrative receivership): SC 29 Oct 2009

Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (No 2), Re: ChD 21 Aug 2009

Parties said that assets of the insolvent company were held by it in trust for them. Held: The court had no jurisdiction to sanction a scheme of arrangement proposed by the administrators between the company and former clients who had proprietary interests in the assets held by the company or on its behalf. Judges: Blackburne … Continue reading Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (No 2), Re: ChD 21 Aug 2009

Sharp and Others v Woolwich Building Society: HL 6 Feb 1997

The House was asked: what is meant by the word property in a floating charge and in section 53(7) of the 1986 Act which provides for the effect of the appointment of a receiver by the holder of such a charge in the following terms: ‘(7) On the appointment of a receiver under this section, … Continue reading Sharp and Others v Woolwich Building Society: HL 6 Feb 1997

Bagnall QC v Official Receiver: CA 1 Dec 2003

Citations: ,[2004] 1 WLR 2832, [2003] EWCA Civ 1925, [2004] 2 All ER 294 Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 279 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Appeal from – Bagnall QC v the Official Receiver ChD 18-Jun-2003 The bankrupt was to receive his automatic discharge. The receiver had applied ex parte to suspend the automatic … Continue reading Bagnall QC v Official Receiver: CA 1 Dec 2003

Bank of India v Morris and others: CA 22 Jun 2005

Citations: [2005] EWCA Civ 693, [2005] BPIR 1067, [2005] 2 BCLC 328, [2005] BCC 739 Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 213 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Main Judgment – Bank of India v Morris and others (Costs) CA 22-Jun-2005 . . Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete. Insolvency, Banking … Continue reading Bank of India v Morris and others: CA 22 Jun 2005

Feakins and Another v Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Civ 1513): CA 9 Dec 2005

The department complained that the defendants had entered into a transaction with their farm at an undervalue so as to defeat its claim for recovery of sums due. The transaction used the grant of a tenancy by the first chargee. Held: The farmers’ appeal as to the farm transaction failed: ‘beyond argument that DEFRA was … Continue reading Feakins and Another v Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Civ 1513): CA 9 Dec 2005

Cartwright v Cartwright and Others: CA 3 Jul 2002

The petitioner former wife sought to make the husband bankrupt on the basis of unpaid maintenance debts. The maintenance was subject to variation by the original foreign court which had made the order. Held: The order was one recognised under the Act. The fact that the foreign court could still order a variation was critical … Continue reading Cartwright v Cartwright and Others: CA 3 Jul 2002

Law Society of England and Wales and others v Shah and others: ChD 30 Nov 2007

Solicitor firms had been made bankrupt leaving a shortfall after thefts from client accounts of over 12 million pounds. The thief had diappeared, and the other partners were now discharged form bankruptcy. The Law Society accepted that it could not proceed to claim against the discharged bankrupts, but now sought recovery from their insurers. Held: … Continue reading Law Society of England and Wales and others v Shah and others: ChD 30 Nov 2007

Revenue and Customs v Chamberlin: CA 22 Mar 2011

The claimant argued that she should not have been made bankrupt on the application of HMRC in respect of VAT sums she now disputed. Judges: Sir Andrew Morritt C, Toulson, Sullivan LJJ Citations: [2011] EWCA Civ 271, [2011] BPIR 691, [2011] STC 1237, [2011] STI 1213, [2011] BVC 162, [2011] NPC 33 Links: Bailii Statutes: … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v Chamberlin: CA 22 Mar 2011

BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd v Eurosail-UK 2007-3BL Plc and Others: CA 7 Mar 2011

The court was asked questions to interpret the terms of interest-bearing notes, which were issued by Eurosail-UK 2007-3BL PLC, a special purpose vehicle formed to hold income-producing assets, consisting of mortgage loans, to be used to meet the liabilities on the Notes, and in particular whether the rspondent had been insolvent when entering into them. … Continue reading BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd v Eurosail-UK 2007-3BL Plc and Others: CA 7 Mar 2011

OTG Ltd v Barke and Others: EAT 16 Feb 2011

EAT TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKING – InsolvencyAdministration proceedings pursuant to Schedule B1 of the Insolvency Act 1986 are not capable of constituting ‘bankruptcy . . or . . analogous insolvency proceedings which have been instituted with a view to the liquidation of the assets of the transferor’ within the meaning of reg. 8 (7) of TUPE … Continue reading OTG Ltd v Barke and Others: EAT 16 Feb 2011

Stonham v Ramrattan and Another: CA 16 Feb 2011

The bankrupt, while solvent had acquired a property which was first put in his own sole name, but then transferred to his wife outwardly ‘in consideration of love and affection’. Several years later, on the bankruptcy, the trustee sought to have the transaction set aside. The bankrupt, now discharged, said that in fact the original … Continue reading Stonham v Ramrattan and Another: CA 16 Feb 2011

Ross and Holmes v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 12 Jan 2010

The claimants appealed against bankruptcy orders made against assessed liability to income tax and penalties. As solicitors, their practice had suffered intervention, but they argued that their assets comfortably exceeded their liabilities and that they should have been given more time to pay. Held: They said that as a result of the intervention within their … Continue reading Ross and Holmes v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 12 Jan 2010

Alexander Forbes Trustee Services Limited and Another v Jackson and Others: ChD 2 Nov 2004

Judges: The Honourable Mr Justice Patten Citations: [2004] EWHC 2448 (Ch) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – T and N Limited, Associated Companies of T and N Ltd (In Administration) v Royal and Sun Alliance Plc, and others ChD 9-May-2003 T and N had exposure to asbestosis claims; these claims were … Continue reading Alexander Forbes Trustee Services Limited and Another v Jackson and Others: ChD 2 Nov 2004

Wallace v Wallace: ChD 25 Sep 2019

‘The present Application raises an interesting question about the scope of section 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (‘IA’). This has been described as the question whether the section has extraterritorial effect. More particularly, the question is whether an Order may be made under the section directed to a Respondent resident abroad, in this case … Continue reading Wallace v Wallace: ChD 25 Sep 2019

Winsor v Bloom and Others; In re Railtrack plc (in railway administration): CA 10 Jul 2002

The claimant, the Rail regulator appealed a decision that he had to apply to court for directions under the 1986 Act before allowing other rail operators access to the track after the company had gone into railway administration. Held: Section 17 of the 1993 Act was sufficient to allow the regulator to make such an … Continue reading Winsor v Bloom and Others; In re Railtrack plc (in railway administration): CA 10 Jul 2002

McGuinness v Norwich and Peterborough Building Society: ChD 23 Nov 2010

The claimant appealed against his bankruptcy saying that it had followed as statutory demand based upon his alleged default under a guarantee of his brothers mortgage borrowings. He said that such a claim was not a liquidated sum within the 1986 Act. Held: The appeal failed. Judges: Briggs J Citations: [2010] NPC 116, [2011] BPIR … Continue reading McGuinness v Norwich and Peterborough Building Society: ChD 23 Nov 2010

Singla v Hedman and Others: ChD 27 Nov 2009

Judges: Kitchin J Citations: [2009] EWHC 3510 (Ch), [2010] BCC 674 Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See Also – Singla v Hedman and Others ChD 28-Apr-2010 The claimant sought an order for wrongful trading against the former directors of a company in liquidation, and to set aside agreements … Continue reading Singla v Hedman and Others: ChD 27 Nov 2009

Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Arif and Others: ChD 25 Mar 1996

The length of a director’s disqualification is not to be discounted for the time elapsed up to the hearing of the case. As to section 221 of the Companies Act, it : ‘has, at the least, two purposes. First, to ensure that those who are concerned in the direction and management of companies which trade … Continue reading Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Arif and Others: ChD 25 Mar 1996

Power and Another v HM Revenue and Customs and Another: ChD 23 Oct 2009

The company had collected savings from consumers toward ‘christmas packs’. It went into liquidation. The revenue asserted claims for unsecured creditors saying that no trust had been created in favour of the savers. Held: No Quistclose type trust was created on payment to the company’s agent. The court considered the classes of creditors and the … Continue reading Power and Another v HM Revenue and Customs and Another: ChD 23 Oct 2009

BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd v Eurosail-UK 2007-3BL Plc and Others: ChD 30 Jul 2010

The parties disputed whether the respondent was in law insolvent at the time it entered into financial transactions with it. Held: The Court rejected the Noteholders’ submission that Eurosail was plainly insolvent for the purposes of section 123(2) as applied, relying on four points. First, Eurosail’s claims in the insolvencies of other companies, though not … Continue reading BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd v Eurosail-UK 2007-3BL Plc and Others: ChD 30 Jul 2010

Area Estates Ltd v Weir: CA 20 Jul 2010

The parties contracted for the sale and purchase of land with vacant possession. It was subject to a lease which the seller said had been surrendered, and it refused to accept any requisitions of objections. After exchange it appeared that the tenant was bankrupt, and the surrender ineffective in law. Upon discovery of this the … Continue reading Area Estates Ltd v Weir: CA 20 Jul 2010

Clarke v Coutts and Co: CA 17 Jun 2002

The respondent bank had obtained a charging order nisi against the applicant’s property. The applicant then obtained an order under s252 of the act requiring any further action against his estate to be stayed. The bank nevertheless obtained an order absolute. The claimant was not represented at that hearing. Several years later he sought to … Continue reading Clarke v Coutts and Co: CA 17 Jun 2002

HSBC Bank Plc v Tambrook Jersey Ltd: CA 22 May 2013

The court considered the interpretation of section 426 of the 1986 Act, and in particular the circumstances in which the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to accede to a request for assistance from a foreign court (in this case, the Royal Court of Jersey). Judges: Longmore, McFarlane, Davis LJJ Citations: [2013] EWCA Civ … Continue reading HSBC Bank Plc v Tambrook Jersey Ltd: CA 22 May 2013

Scottish and Newcastle Ltd v Raguz: ChD 10 Jun 2010

The defendant sought permission to appeal against the order made on the application for his bankruptcy, saying that he wished to bring new evidence. He said that he had offered sufficient security for the debt and the court should adjourn the petition pending the sale of assets. Judges: Proudman J Citations: [2010] EWHC 1384 (Ch) … Continue reading Scottish and Newcastle Ltd v Raguz: ChD 10 Jun 2010

Everitt v Budhram and Another: ChD 20 May 2009

The trustee in bankruptcy appealed against rejection of his claim for the sale of the home in which the bankrupts each held a one half share. The bankruptcies arose from non payment of council tax. The principle sums had been repaid, and the outstanding matters were the trustee’s costs. The bankrupts had not co-operated, and … Continue reading Everitt v Budhram and Another: ChD 20 May 2009

Re Petropavlovsk Plc: ChD 5 Aug 2022

Approval of proposed sale of business Judges: Jonathan Hilliard QC Sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court Citations: [2022] EWHC 2097 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Insolvency Updated: 18 August 2022; Ref: scu.680254

In re Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander Ltd: CA 11 May 2010

The court was asked as to the set-off, in a company administration, of future debts owed by the company to its creditors and by those creditors to the company, and whether the effect of those provisions was that, after the future debts were discounted to a present value for the purpose of set-off, leaving a … Continue reading In re Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander Ltd: CA 11 May 2010

Soutzos v Asombang and Others: ChD 23 Apr 2010

The claimant had lent substantial sums to the defendant. The defendant had subsequently been made bankrupt, and now said he was released from the debt. Judges: Newey J Citations: [2010] EWHC 842 (Ch), [2010] BPIR 960 Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 281 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See Also – Soutzos v Asombang … Continue reading Soutzos v Asombang and Others: ChD 23 Apr 2010

Barry v Midland Bank Plc: HL 22 Jul 1999

The defendant implemented a voluntary retirement scheme under which benefits were calculated according to the period of service of the employee. The plaintiff claimed that the scheme discriminated against workers who had taken career breaks, and therefore against women. Held: A severance pay scheme, which calculated the amount payable according to length of service and … Continue reading Barry v Midland Bank Plc: HL 22 Jul 1999

Re Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander Ltd: ChD 19 Feb 2010

Judges: Blair J Citations: [2010] EWHC 316 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Binding – In re SSSL Realisations (2002) Ltd and Another; Squires and others v AIG Europe (UK) Ltd and Another CA 18-Jan-2006 A creditor claiming an equity in a debt but who himself owed money to … Continue reading Re Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander Ltd: ChD 19 Feb 2010

Jack and Another (London Scottish Finance Ltd) v Craig and Others: ChD 17 Dec 2013

Application by the joint administrators of LSF for directions arising out of loan agreements made or acquired by LSF before the administration began, under which secured loans were made to consumers but which were unenforceable because they contravened provisions of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Held: The phrase ‘realisation of the security’ in section 106, … Continue reading Jack and Another (London Scottish Finance Ltd) v Craig and Others: ChD 17 Dec 2013

Re Petropavlovsk Plc: ChD 1 Aug 2022

Judges: Jonathan Hilliard QC Sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court Citations: [2022] EWHC 2074 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Insolvency Updated: 13 August 2022; Ref: scu.679838

Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) and Others: ChD 14 Mar 2014

On the winding up of the company, there had unexpectedly been a surplus of assets after payment of all debts. The court was now asked to determine claims to be allowed before a distribution was made. Held: The court made declarations as follows: ‘i) The claims of LBHI2 under its subordinated loan agreements with LBIE … Continue reading Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) and Others: ChD 14 Mar 2014

In re Nortel Companies and Others: SC 24 Jul 2013

The court was asked as to the interrelationship of the statutory schemes relating to the protection of employees’ pensions and to corporate insolvency. Held: Liabilities which arose from financial support directions or contribution notices issued by the Pensions Regulator under the 2004 Act after the company had gone into administration, which required the company to … Continue reading In re Nortel Companies and Others: SC 24 Jul 2013

Bloom and Others v The Pensions Regulator (Nortel, Re): ChD 10 Dec 2010

Applications for directions by the administrators of twenty companies in two groups, all raising the same common questions as to the effect of the Financial Support Direction regime created by the Pensions Act 2004 upon companies in administration or insolvent liquidation.Briggs J said that Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Toshoku established as ‘a general rule’ that: … Continue reading Bloom and Others v The Pensions Regulator (Nortel, Re): ChD 10 Dec 2010

Ward v Aitken and Others; In re Oasis Merchandising Services Ltd: CA 9 Oct 1996

The Court was asked as to the validity of the assignment by a liquidator to a litigation funder of the benefit of a wrongful trading claim against the directors of the company under section 214 of the IA 1986. The directors sought to stay the claim on the basis that the liquidator had no power … Continue reading Ward v Aitken and Others; In re Oasis Merchandising Services Ltd: CA 9 Oct 1996

Ward v Aitken and Others; In re Oasis Merchandising Services Ltd: ChD 19 Jun 1995

An agreement to share the proceeds of litigation against Directors was champertous. Citations: Times 19-Jun-1995 Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 S4P6 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal from – Ward v Aitken and Others; In re Oasis Merchandising Services Ltd CA 9-Oct-1996 The Court was asked as to the validity of the assignment by a … Continue reading Ward v Aitken and Others; In re Oasis Merchandising Services Ltd: ChD 19 Jun 1995

Hofer v Strawson: ChD 31 Mar 1999

The debtor had agreed to buy a company from the petitioner, the price to be payable in instalments by means of post-dated cheques. The debtor alleged misrepresentation and stopped one of the cheques. The petitioner served a statutory demand based on the dishonoured cheque. The district judge dismissed the debtor’s application to set aside the … Continue reading Hofer v Strawson: ChD 31 Mar 1999

Hardy v Focus Insurance Co (In Liquidation): ChD 19 Jul 1996

The Court has no power to direct the Official Receiver as to suspension of bankruptcy. Citations: Times 19-Jul-1996, [1997] BPIR 77 Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 303(1) 303(2) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Bagnall QC v the Official Receiver ChD 18-Jun-2003 The bankrupt was to receive his automatic discharge. The receiver had applied … Continue reading Hardy v Focus Insurance Co (In Liquidation): ChD 19 Jul 1996

In re Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander Ltd: ChD 2 Oct 2009

Judges: Norris J Citations: [2009] EWHC 2308 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal From – In re Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander Ltd CA 11-May-2010 The court was asked as to the set-off, in a company administration, of future debts owed by the company to its creditors and … Continue reading In re Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander Ltd: ChD 2 Oct 2009

Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd v Larnell (Insurances) Ltd: CA 29 Nov 2005

The claimant investors said that their financial adviser, the defendant insolvent company, had given them negligent advice. The action was brought as a preliminary to claiming against the defendant’s insurers under the 1930 Act, in the way made necessary by the Post Office and Bradley cases. Limitation defences were deployed to strike the action out. … Continue reading Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd v Larnell (Insurances) Ltd: CA 29 Nov 2005