Click the case name for better results:

Cheshire Constabulary (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 26 May 2020

The complainant requested information relating to details of the company, or companies, providing private security to a Cheshire Hunt. Cheshire Constabulary refused to comply with the request on the grounds that it would exceed the appropriate limit at section 12(2) (cost of compliance) of the FOIA to confirm or deny whether it held the requested … Continue reading Cheshire Constabulary (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 26 May 2020

Darragh etc v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police: CA 16 Oct 1998

In the trial, the complainant sought damages against the police for various alleged acts of malpractice. The judge ordered trial before a jury under the section, but it later became clear that detailed consideration would be required of scientific evidence, and the judge ordered trial by judge without a jury. On appeal the court felt … Continue reading Darragh etc v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police: CA 16 Oct 1998

Hopson (Darren) v Chief Constable of North Wales Police: QBD 25 Oct 2002

The applicant challenged the imposition of a sex offender’s order, on the basis that having been convicted of the last offence, that was the date after which he had to have behaved in such a way as to cause the concern necessary in turn to found an application. Held: The Act required only such behaviour … Continue reading Hopson (Darren) v Chief Constable of North Wales Police: QBD 25 Oct 2002

Jackson v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police: QBD 22 Oct 1993

Mr Jackson was convicted of a drugs offence. On arrest, the police had seized money in his possession. No order as to the money was made at the trial. Mr Jackson applied under the Act. The magistrate accepted that Mr Jackson was the owner of the money, but, because he (the magistrate) considered that it … Continue reading Jackson v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police: QBD 22 Oct 1993

George Worme Grenada Today Limited v The Commissioner of Police: PC 29 Jan 2004

PC (Grenada) The defendant was editor of a newspaper which carried a story severely defamatory of the prime minister. He was convicted of criminal libel, and appealed. Held: The appeal was dismissed. The onus of proof remained, correctly, on the prosecution to prove that the libel was false. The prosecution also had to show that … Continue reading George Worme Grenada Today Limited v The Commissioner of Police: PC 29 Jan 2004

Chief Constable of North Wales Police v Evans: 2 Jan 1982

Citations: [1982] 1 WLR 1164 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Chief Constable of the North Wales Police v Evans HL 1982 The Court found the probationer police constable to have been unlawfully induced to resign, but the court could not order his reinstatement. A power must be exercised by the precise person … Continue reading Chief Constable of North Wales Police v Evans: 2 Jan 1982

Regina v Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Ex parte Parker: 1953

Citations: [1953] 1 WLR 1150 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Al-Hasan, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department HL 16-Feb-2005 Prisoners were disciplined after refusing to be squat searched, saying that the procedure was humiliating and that there were no reasonable grounds to suspect them of … Continue reading Regina v Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Ex parte Parker: 1953

Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice) FS50854993: ICO 5 Dec 2019

The complainant has requested stop and search data from the Metropolitan Police Service (the ‘MPS’). The MPS refused to disclose the requested information advising that the request was vexatious under section 14(1) of the FOIA, on the basis of the oppressive burden in compliance. The Commissioner’s decision is that the MPS was entitled to find … Continue reading Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice) FS50854993: ICO 5 Dec 2019

Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice) FS50866205: ICO 5 Dec 2019

The complainant has requested Special Branch files about the Partisan Coffee House in Soho from the Metropolitan Police Service (the ‘MPS’). The MPS refused to confirm or deny whether it holds any information, citing the exemptions at sections 23(5) (information supplied by, or relating to, bodies dealing with security matters), 24(2) (national Security), 30(3) (criminal … Continue reading Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice) FS50866205: ICO 5 Dec 2019

Hampshire Police and Crime Panel (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 19 Dec 2019

The complainant requested from Hampshire Police and Crime Panel (HPCP) information relating to its organisational matters, expenses, complaints management, budget and terms of reference. HPCP provided the complainant with information in relation to some parts of the request and stated that it did not hold information for the remaining parts of the information request. The … Continue reading Hampshire Police and Crime Panel (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 19 Dec 2019

Commissioner of The Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 22 May 2019

The complainant requested information about crimes reported on the Parliamentary estate. The Commissioner’s decision is that the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police failed to respond to the request within 20 working days and has therefore breached section 10 of the FOIA. The Commissioner requires the MPS to take the following steps to ensure compliance with … Continue reading Commissioner of The Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 22 May 2019

Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 19 Jul 2019

The complainant requested copies of the Metropolitan Police Service’s contracts for the provision of cleaning services. The Commissioner’s decision is that the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) has breached section 10(1) of the FOIA in that it failed to provide a valid response to the request within the statutory time frame of 20 working days. The … Continue reading Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 19 Jul 2019

Thames Valley Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 21 Jan 2020

The complainant requested information relating to a specified address. Thames Valley Police confirmed it held information within the scope of the request but refused to provide it, citing sections 31(1)(a) and (b) (law enforcement) and 38(1)(a) and (b) (health and safety) of the FOIA. The Commissioner investigated its application of sections 31 and 38. She … Continue reading Thames Valley Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 21 Jan 2020

Commissioner of The Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice) FS50591863: ICO 14 Oct 2015

The complainant has requested information in connection with criminal charges brought against an MP. The Metropolitan Police Service (the ‘MPS’) initially confirmed it held related information but refused to provide it citing the exemptions at sections 40(2)(personal information) and 30(1)(a) (criminal investigations and proceedings) of the FOIA. During the course of the Commissioner’s investigation the … Continue reading Commissioner of The Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice) FS50591863: ICO 14 Oct 2015

Commissioner of The Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice) FS50570434: ICO 14 Oct 2015

The complainant has requested information concerning an alleged police informant from the Metropolitan Police Service (the ‘MPS’). The MPS would neither confirm nor deny holding the requested information citing the exemptions at sections 40(5) (personal data), 23(5) (information supplied by, or concerning, certain security bodies), 30(3) (criminal investigations and proceedings) and 31(3) (law enforcement); it … Continue reading Commissioner of The Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice) FS50570434: ICO 14 Oct 2015

Police Service of Northern Ireland (Decision Notice): ICO 31 Jan 2012

The complainant requested information relating to a police investigation. The Police Service of Northern Ireland (the PSNI) refused to comply with the request, arguing that it was vexatious under section 14(1) of the Act. Following the Commissioner’s intervention the PSNI withdrew reliance on section 14 and issued a revised refusal notice to the complainant. The … Continue reading Police Service of Northern Ireland (Decision Notice): ICO 31 Jan 2012

Police Service of Northern Ireland (Decision Notice): ICO 21 Jun 2011

The complainant requested information relating to a specified address during the 1970s. The PSNI refused to confirm or deny whether it held any relevant information, citing the exemptions at sections 23(5), 24(2), 30(3), 31(3) and 40(5) of the Act. The Commissioner finds that the PSNI correctly applied the exemptions, and does not require any further … Continue reading Police Service of Northern Ireland (Decision Notice): ICO 21 Jun 2011

Ahmed v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police: CA 28 Jul 1998

The court considered whether, and if so, the circumstances in which, police officers may be liable in negligence to suspects for failure to comply with the Codes of Practice. Citations: [1998] EWCA Civ 1305 Statutes: Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 66 67 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Negligence, Torts – Other, Police Updated: 23 November … Continue reading Ahmed v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police: CA 28 Jul 1998

Police Federation of England and Wales (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 5 Dec 2019

The complainant has requested information from the Police Federation of England and Wales statistics about suicides of police officers of federated rank. The Police Federation of England and Wales explained that it does not hold the requested information. The Commissioner’s decision is that, on the balance of probabilities, the Police Federation of England and Wales … Continue reading Police Federation of England and Wales (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 5 Dec 2019

Lancashire Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 17 Dec 2019

The complainant requested information about ‘all incidents’ which had taken place within a specified area over the preceding five years. Lancashire Constabulary provided some of the requested information but withheld the remainder citing section 40(2), the exemption for personal information. During the Commissioner’s investigation, he subsequently stipulated that he only required the information for one … Continue reading Lancashire Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 17 Dec 2019

A and Others v The Metropolitan Police Service: IPT 2 Nov 2006

The Tribunal examined whether alleged interception could have been made lawful by authorisation under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act or the Telecommunications (Lawful Business Practice) Regulations 2000. Citations: [2006] UKIPTrib 02 – 15 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Police, Human Rights Updated: 22 November 2022; Ref: scu.525993

N v The Police: IPT 2 Dec 2009

This Ruling found that there was an interference with privacy contrary to Article 8 in respect of the use directed surveillance by using existing public CCTV. The decision to authorise surveillance had taken place after the Crown Prosecution Service had taken the decision not to prosecute the Complainant. The subsequent decision on remedies ordered that … Continue reading N v The Police: IPT 2 Dec 2009

A v Chief Constable of the West Yorkshire Police and Another: CA 5 Nov 2002

The appellant had undergone a male to female sex change, but was refused employment by the respondent before the Human Rights Act came into effect. Held: Although the Human Rights Act could not apply, the act was in breach of the Equal Treatment Directive and discrimination. The 1999 regulations were incompatible with the provisions of … Continue reading A v Chief Constable of the West Yorkshire Police and Another: CA 5 Nov 2002

Thames Valley Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 9 Dec 2019

The complainant requested the total numbers of police officers deployed to Royal Ascot, together with the associated costs, for four specified years. Thames Valley Police (‘TVP’) refused to provide the requested information citing subsections (a) and (b) of section 31(1), the exemption for law enforcement, and said it did not hold the cost related information. … Continue reading Thames Valley Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 9 Dec 2019

Surrey Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 6 Dec 2019

The complainant requested information about blackmail crimes. The Commissioner’s decision is that Surrey Police has breached section 10(1) of the FOIA in that it failed to provide a valid response to the request within the statutory time frame of 20 working days. The Commissioner requires Surrey Police to issue a substantive response to the request … Continue reading Surrey Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 6 Dec 2019

Police Service of Northern Ireland (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 19 Dec 2019

The complainant requested information from the Police Service of Northern Ireland (‘PSNI’) in relation to disciplinary proceedings against a police officer. The PSNI refused to disclose the requested information, citing the exemptions at sections 31 and 40(2) as a basis for non-disclosure. The Commissioner’s decision is that the PSNI has correctly applied section 31 of … Continue reading Police Service of Northern Ireland (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 19 Dec 2019

Thames Valley Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 3 Dec 2019

The complainant requested the total numbers of police officers deployed to Reading Festival for three specified years. Thames Valley Police (‘TVP’) refused to provide the requested information citing subsections (a) and (b) of section 31(1), the exemption for law enforcement. The Commissioner’s decision is that TVP was correct to cite sections 31(1)(a) and (b) of … Continue reading Thames Valley Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 3 Dec 2019

Civil Nuclear Constabulary (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 16 Dec 2019

The complainant requested information from the Home Office about the policing of an industrial dispute in 1983. The Commissioner’s decision is that the Home Office breached section 17(3) of the FOIA by failing to complete its public interest test considerations within a reasonable timeframe. FOI 10: Complaint upheld Citations: [2019] UKICO fs50889250 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: … Continue reading Civil Nuclear Constabulary (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 16 Dec 2019

N v The Police: IPT 8 Feb 2010

This Ruling found that there was an interference with privacy contrary to Article 8 in respect of the use directed surveillance by using existing public CCTV. The decision to authorise surveillance had taken place after the Crown Prosecution Service had taken the decision not to prosecute the Complainant. The subsequent decision on remedies ordered that … Continue reading N v The Police: IPT 8 Feb 2010

ZH v The Commissioner of Police for The Metropolis: QBD 14 Mar 2012

The claimant sought damages. He was severely autistic needing one to one support. On a familiarisation visit to a swimming pool he became transfixed by the water. A pool lifeguard was told not to touch him, but his carers were unable to distract him, and the pool management called the police as he became agitated. … Continue reading ZH v The Commissioner of Police for The Metropolis: QBD 14 Mar 2012

Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice) ic-79467: ICO 25 Jan 2022

The complainant has requested information about arrests and investigations related to drill music from the Metropolitan Police Service (the ‘MPS’). The MPS advised that some of the information is not held, and that compliance with the remainder of the request would exceed the cost limit at either 12(1) or 12(2) (Cost of compliance) of the … Continue reading Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice) ic-79467: ICO 25 Jan 2022

Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice) ic-54745: ICO 25 Jan 2022

The complainant has requested information about arrests and investigations related to drill music from the Metropolitan Police Service (the ‘MPS’). The MPS advised that to comply with the request would exceed to appropriate limit at section 12(1) of the FOIA. The Commissioner’s decision is that the MPS was entitled to rely on section 12(1) of … Continue reading Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice) ic-54745: ICO 25 Jan 2022

Reynolds v Kingston (Police Services Board): 14 Mar 2007

(Court of Appeal for Ontario ) Immunity from suit in negligence for witness evidence. Citations: 2007 84 OR (3d) 738, 2007 280 DLR (4th) 311, 2007 221 O.A.C. 216 Links: Canlii Jurisdiction: Canada Cited by: Cited – Jones v Kaney SC 30-Mar-2011 An expert witness admitted signing a joint report but without agreeing to it. … Continue reading Reynolds v Kingston (Police Services Board): 14 Mar 2007

Commissioner of Police for Metropolis v Gerald: CA 10 Jun 1998

Damages for distress falling short of physical injury should be recovered as an element of any aggravated damages, not as part of the basic award. A failure to discipline a police officer responsible for the injury was not capable of aggravating the claim. Citations: Times 26-Jun-1998, [1998] EWCA Civ 946 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited … Continue reading Commissioner of Police for Metropolis v Gerald: CA 10 Jun 1998

News Group Newspapers Ltd and Others v Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis: IPT 17 Dec 2015

This claim is brought against the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis by News Group Newspapers and three journalists employed by The Sun newspaper, Mr Tom Newton Dunn, the political editor, Mr Anthony France and Mr Craig Woodhouse in respect of four authorisations issued under s 22 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 … Continue reading News Group Newspapers Ltd and Others v Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis: IPT 17 Dec 2015

H and H v The Police Federation of Great Britain: IPT 28 Feb 2005

IPT The Tribunal found that a police force’s use of covert surveillance against a police officer breached his Article 8 rights as it had no lawful authority for the surveillance activities it undertook (but its decision is overtaken by C v The Police (IPT/03/32) in 2006) Citations: [2005] UKIPTrib 03 – 23 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: … Continue reading H and H v The Police Federation of Great Britain: IPT 28 Feb 2005

Alleyne v The Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis: QBD 21 Sep 2012

The Claimant claimed for damages for trespass to premises, contending that the entry and search of his premises was unlawful (whether in itself or because he was assaulted during the course of entry); for trespass to the person, in that he was unlawfully handcuffed and deliberately kicked in the right eye and deliberately struck to … Continue reading Alleyne v The Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis: QBD 21 Sep 2012

Connor and others v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police: CA 22 Nov 2006

The claimants appealed dismissal of their claim for damages for malicious prosecution after the obtaining of a search warrant. Held: The appeals failed. There was no express power to use reasonable force and to temporarily those discovered in premises to be searched in order to execute a warrant under the 1968 Act, but one must … Continue reading Connor and others v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police: CA 22 Nov 2006

Regina v Northumbria Police ex parte Brown: CA 8 Apr 1998

The applicant renewed his application for a judicial review of decisions by the respondent as to his treatment. He had been a police informer, but then moved to Devon for his protection. He became indigent. Held: The order sought would be quite outside the power of the court. Leave refused. Citations: [1998] EWCA Civ 670 … Continue reading Regina v Northumbria Police ex parte Brown: CA 8 Apr 1998

Pollard v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police: CA 28 Apr 1998

Damages for assault by police dog. Held: Though in principle reasonable force can be used in the course of assisting in the arrest of a suspected offender, that must always be reasonable and proportionate. The claimant’s appeal failed. The judge had properly taken account of all matters which he should have done, and no flaw … Continue reading Pollard v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police: CA 28 Apr 1998

Chief Constable of Gwent Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 4 Oct 2021

The complainant requested various information about ‘Project Habitance’, ‘Project Habitance II’ and ‘Project Inhabitance’. Gwent Police refused to confirm or deny whether it held information falling within the scope of the request on the basis of sections 23(5) (security bodies), 27(4)(a) and (b) (international relations), 30(3) (investigations), 31(3) (law enforcement) and section 40(5) (personal information). … Continue reading Chief Constable of Gwent Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 4 Oct 2021

Staffordshire Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 9 Jan 2020

The complainant requested information relating to material referred to in a published report. During the course of the Commissioner’s investigation, Staffordshire Police revisited its handling of parts (1) and (2) of the request. It confirmed it held information within the scope of part (1) of the request but denied holding information within the scope of … Continue reading Staffordshire Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 9 Jan 2020

Rhodes, Regina (on The Application of) v Police and Crime Commissioner for Lincolnshire: Admn 28 Mar 2013

The claimant sought to challenge a decision of the respondent to suspend him as Chief Constable. Held: The terms of regulation 4(1) confer a broad discretion on the appropriate authority. However, that discretion is subject to the conditions in reg. 4(2). An officer can only be suspended in the public interest if this course is … Continue reading Rhodes, Regina (on The Application of) v Police and Crime Commissioner for Lincolnshire: Admn 28 Mar 2013

Hamaiziam and Another v The Commissioner of Police for The Metropolis: QBD 17 Apr 2013

Two serving prisoners asserted defamation by the respondent in a publication suggesting that they were associated with a murder. Judges: Tugendhat J Citations: [2013] EWHC 848 (QB) Links: Bailii Citing: Cited – Cammish v Hughes CA 12-Dec-2012 Arden LJ summarised the law as regard abuse of process claims in defamation cases, saying that while the … Continue reading Hamaiziam and Another v The Commissioner of Police for The Metropolis: QBD 17 Apr 2013

South Wales Police Authority v Johnson: EAT 19 Mar 2013

EAT Practice and Procedure : Appellate Jurisdiction or Reasons or Burns-Barke Appeal allowed and case remitted to same Employment Tribunal to reconsider their finding on extending time for bringing the two complaints of direct race discrimination upheld by the Employment Tribunal. Judges: Peter Clark J Citations: [2013] UKEAT 0628 – 11 – 1903 Links: Bailii … Continue reading South Wales Police Authority v Johnson: EAT 19 Mar 2013

Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 16 Feb 2022

The complainant requested information from West Yorkshire Police about the telephone system used at Havertop Lane Police Station in relation to telephone calls he believed had been made. West Yorkshire Police denied holding some of the requested information and refused to confirm or deny whether it held the remainder, citing sections 40(5) (personal information) and … Continue reading Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 16 Feb 2022

Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 24 Feb 2022

– The complainant requested details of a number of information sharing agreements the Metropolitan Police Service (the ‘MPS’) may have with other organisations. – The Commissioner’s decision is that the MPS failed to respond to the request within 20 working days and has therefore breached section 10 of the FOIA. – The Commissioner requires the … Continue reading Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 24 Feb 2022

Baker v Police Appeals Tribunal: Admn 27 Mar 2013

The claimant a former police constable sought judicial review of a decision made by the tribunal, saying that it had had no jurisdiction to make it. The respondent tribunal, having now accepted that it had not had the power it exercised, being then functus officio, nevertheless maintained that the decision should not be quashed where … Continue reading Baker v Police Appeals Tribunal: Admn 27 Mar 2013

Murphy and Others v The Commmissioner of Police for The Metropolis: QBD 25 Sep 2012

The claimants sought disclosure of documents said by the defendant to be protected by legal professional privilege, and in particular the complaints histories of the officers intended to be called by the defendant at the forthcoming trial. Judges: Lindblom J Citations: [2012] EWHC 4123 (QB) Links: Bailii Litigation Practice Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.471777

AKJ and Others v Commissioner of Police for The Metroplis and Others: QBD 17 Jan 2013

The claimants sought damages for the actions of undercover police officers engaging in sexual activity as part of the investigation. The court now considered the role of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal in dealing with such claims. Held: Such activity fell within ‘personal or other relationship with a person’ for the purposes of section 26(8) of … Continue reading AKJ and Others v Commissioner of Police for The Metroplis and Others: QBD 17 Jan 2013

French, Regina (on The Application of) v The Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police: Admn 15 Mar 2011

The claimant sought judicial review of police disciplinary proceedings against her saying that it should have been by way of a disciplinary meeting, and that a member of the panel had served on two of the panels. Judges: Behrens J Citations: [2011] EWHC 546 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Police (Conduct) Regulations 2008 Jurisdiction: England and … Continue reading French, Regina (on The Application of) v The Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police: Admn 15 Mar 2011

Chief Constable of Surrey Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 11 Aug 2021

The complainant requested from Surrey Police information in relation to landlord/tenant disputes. Surrey Police relied on section 12(1) of the FOIA to refuse to comply with the complainant’s request as it considered the cost of doing so would exceed the appropriate limit. The Commissioner’s decision is that Surrey Police has correctly cited section 12(1) FOIA … Continue reading Chief Constable of Surrey Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 11 Aug 2021

Dyfed Powys Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 6 Jan 2022

The complainant requested information from Dyfed Powys Police (‘DPP’) relating to the forms used by officers to request examination of digital devices. The Commissioner’s decision is that DPP were entitled to refuse to comply with the request under section 12(2) of the FOIA, and that they had complied with their obligations under section 16(1) of … Continue reading Dyfed Powys Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 6 Jan 2022

Sussex Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 7 Jul 2021

The complainant requested information from Sussex Police about a specified report. Sussex Police has failed to respond to this request. The Commissioner requires Sussex Police to provide the complainant with a response to this request in accordance with its obligations under FOIA. Sussex Police must take these steps within 35 calendar days of the date … Continue reading Sussex Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 7 Jul 2021

Caetano v Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis: Admn 28 Feb 2013

The claimant now challenged the giving of a simple caution for an alleged assault on her partner. Held: The evidential basis of the offer of the caution was unsatisfactory, but she had accepted it on legal advice. The case involved allegations of domestic violence toward the applicant, and a prosecution may not have met the … Continue reading Caetano v Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis: Admn 28 Feb 2013

Felicien v Metropolitan Police Authority and Another: EAT 23 Jan 2013

EAT Practice and Procedure : Costs – Appeal against decision to hear wasted costs application prior to completion of proceedings – Dismissed because decision superseded by subsequent developments – Observations about undesirability of delay in producing a written record of Tribunal judgments. Judges: Underhill J Citations: [2013] UKEAT 0362 – 12 – 2301 Links: Bailii … Continue reading Felicien v Metropolitan Police Authority and Another: EAT 23 Jan 2013

Roberts v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police: CA 16 Jan 2013

The parties had settled a previous dispute with a Tomlin order including the clause: ‘Mr Roberts accepts the above terms in full and final satisfaction of his claims in the said action number 1OL90045 and of any claim or potential claim which he has or may have up to the date hereof against GMP, or … Continue reading Roberts v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police: CA 16 Jan 2013

Leicestershire Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 26 Jan 2022

The complainant has requested information from Leicestershire Police , in relation to a road traffic accident that happened on a particular date, on a specific road. The Commissioner’s decision is that Leicestershire Police is entitled to rely on the exemption at section 40(2) of the FOIA to withhold the requested information. The Commissioner does not … Continue reading Leicestershire Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 26 Jan 2022

Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 18 Feb 2022

The complainant submitted a request to The Metropolitan Police Service (the MPS) for bodycam footage from an officer who attended his property on a specific date. The MPS acknowledged the request but have failed to provide a substantive response to date. The Commissioner’s decision is that the MPS has failed to respond to the request … Continue reading Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 18 Feb 2022

Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 13 Jan 2022

1. The complainant requested from the Metropolitan Police Service (‘the MPS’) information relating to a specific road traffic incident which occurred on the road where they live. The MPS withheld the requested information under section 40(5) – personal information (neither confirm nor deny) of the FOIA. 2. The Commissioner’s decision is that the MPS is … Continue reading Metropolitan Police Service (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 13 Jan 2022

Northumbria Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 19 Jul 2022

The complainant requested information from Northumbria Police about classification of crimes and numbers of crimes associated with an incident number. Northumbria Police refused to comply with the request citing section 12(1) (cost limit) of FOIA. The Commissioner’s decision is that Northumbria Police was entitled to refuse to comply with the request in accordance with section … Continue reading Northumbria Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 19 Jul 2022

Harkin v Hellawell (Sued As the Chief Constable of West Yorks Police): CA 4 Dec 1997

The claimant had been bitten by a police dog and wished to claim damages. She appealed refusal of an order for records of the dog to be disclosed. Held: The request was phrased impossibly widely and had been properly refused. Citations: [1997] EWCA Civ 2915 Statutes: Animals Act 1971 2 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Personal … Continue reading Harkin v Hellawell (Sued As the Chief Constable of West Yorks Police): CA 4 Dec 1997

Da Silva and Entwistle v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police: CA 11 Dec 1997

The plaintiff had commenced an action for assault against the police, but had then let it sleep. The defendant’s application for it to be struck out failed. When the plaintiff applied to set it down, the defendant realising his error sought again a strike out. Held: The further delay after the first hearing was not … Continue reading Da Silva and Entwistle v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police: CA 11 Dec 1997

Greater Manchester Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 19 Jan 2022

The complainant requested information relating to the performance of a specific Officer and also of the call handling centre of the force. By the date of this notice, Greater Manchester Police (GMP) had not issued a substantive response to this request. The Commissioner’s decision is that GMP has breached section 10(1) of the FOIA in … Continue reading Greater Manchester Police (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 19 Jan 2022

Re AB (Court of Protection: Police Disclosure): CoP 22 Oct 2019

Application by a Police Force for disclosure of psychological reports prepared by a psychologist in relation to AB who was and is the subject of proceedings in the Court of Protection. AB is an immensely vulnerable person and the Official Solicitor acting as his litigation friend opposes the application for disclosure made by the police … Continue reading Re AB (Court of Protection: Police Disclosure): CoP 22 Oct 2019

Office of The Police and Crime Commissioner for Derbyshire (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 8 Sep 2020

The complainant has requested information about speed camera criteria from the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for Derbyshire (the ‘OPCC’). The OPCC advised the complainant that it did not hold the requested information. The Commissioner’s decision is that, on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities, the OPCC does not hold the … Continue reading Office of The Police and Crime Commissioner for Derbyshire (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 8 Sep 2020

Office of The Police and Crime Commissioner of Lincolnshire (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 9 Feb 2022

The complainant requested information from the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for Lincolnshire (PCC) relating to complaints received by the PCC. By the date of this notice the PCC had not issued a substantive response to this request. The Commissioner’s decision is that the PCC has breached section 10(1) of the FOIA in … Continue reading Office of The Police and Crime Commissioner of Lincolnshire (Police and Criminal Justice): ICO 9 Feb 2022

Durham Constabulary (Police and Criminal Justice ): ICO 30 Jun 2015

The complainant has requested information about income Durham Police received. The Commissioner’s decision is that Durham Police has applied section 12 appropriately. The Commissioner does not require Durham Police to take any further steps as a result of this decision. FOI 12: Not upheld Citations: [2015] UKICO FS50568708 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Information … Continue reading Durham Constabulary (Police and Criminal Justice ): ICO 30 Jun 2015

Trade Union of the Police in the Slovak Republic and Others v Slovakia: ECHR 25 Sep 2012

Article 11-1 Freedom of association Strong ministerial criticism of calls by police union for Government’s resignation: no violation Facts – The first applicant was a trade union representing police officers. The second, third and fourth applicants were respectively its former president and vice-president and one of its members. In October 2005 the union organised a … Continue reading Trade Union of the Police in the Slovak Republic and Others v Slovakia: ECHR 25 Sep 2012