‘Materiality under the section ‘must mean material to the tenant or to his enjoyment of the house.’ Judges: Stephenson LJ Citations: [1973] 1 WLR 845 Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 2(2) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Doubted – Malekshad v Howard de Walden Estates Limited HL 5-Dec-2002 A house and an adjoining building had … Continue reading Parsons v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity: CA 1973
The House left open the exact meaning of the phrase ‘material’ in the section noting that whether a part is material is an issue which must be largely factual and one of common sense. The legislative purpose of the rule that divisions of the building horizontally were to be disregarded lay in the difficulty, in … Continue reading Parsons v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity; Parson v Gage: HL 1974
LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – house – premium – whether three detached houses in Solihull had same growth rate as property in prime central London and should be valued using the Sportelli deferment rate without adjustment for greater risk of lower growth – whether adjustment to the deferment rate justified for obsolescence, volatility and/or illiquidity – section … Continue reading JGS Properties Ltd v King and Others: UTLC 19 Jun 2017
LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – costs – whether purchasing tenants liable to pay freeholder’s valuation fee incurred after application to FTT had been submitted – whether cost incurred in pursuance of tenant’s notice of claim – s.9(4)(e) Leasehold Reform Act 1967 Citations: [2017] UKUT 157 (LC) Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 9(4)(e) Jurisdiction: England and … Continue reading Chung and Another v Towey (Leasehold Enfranchisement – Costs): UTLC 18 Apr 2017
The social policy underlying the 1967 Act is that ‘the land belongs in equity to the landowner and the house belongs in equity to the occupying leaseholder.’ Judges: Lord Denning MR Citations: (1973) 26 P and CR 191, (1973) 227 EG 1467 Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – … Continue reading Official Custodian for Charities v Goldridge: CA 1973
The claimants challenged the 1967 Act, saying that it deprived them of their property rights when lessees were given the power to purchase the freehold reversion. Held: Article 1 (P1-1) in substance guarantees the right of property. Allowing a mechanism for the compulsory transfer of the freehold interest in the house and the land to … Continue reading James and Others v The United Kingdom: ECHR 21 Feb 1986
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – purchase price on enfranchisement – amendments introduced into s.9(1A) of Leasehold Reform Act 1967 by s.23(1) of Housing and Planning Act 1986 – s.23(3) providing that these amendments do not apply on a case (such as the present) where a s.14 notice of desire to have an extended lease was given … Continue reading London Sephardi Trust v John Lyon’s Charity: UTLC 19 Nov 2015
The curtilage of a house is narrowly confined to the area surrounding it and did not extend to a paddock. Buckley LJ said: ‘In my judgment, for one corporeal hereditament to fall within the curtilage of another, the former must be so intimately associated with the latter as to lead to the conclusion that the … Continue reading Methuen-Campbell v Walters: CA 1978
The Tribunal considered, for the first time the effect of a marriage value in determining the price of the freehold reversion. Held: The marriage value was to be divided equally between the freeholder and tenant applicant. W H Rees FRICS [1976] 1 EGLR 215, [1976] 238 EG 421, (1976) 32 P and CR 147 Housing … Continue reading Norfolk v Trinity College, Cambridge: 1 Apr 1976
The tenant owned two leasehold properties, which had been joined into one. The tenant sought enfranchisement of only one of the properties to avoid being blocked by the rateable value limit, and by 2(2). . .
LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANSHISEMENT – extended lease – ground rent – lack of market evidence – standing house approach – personal or financial circumstances not to be taken into account – legislation to be applied as it . .
The tenant gave notice to enfranchise his leasehold property. The landlord resisted saying it had been given after the tenancy had expired and also that it purported to include property not capable of enfranchisement.
Held: A notice which . .
LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – HOUSE – preliminary issue – disregard of tenant’s improvements – reality principle – house originally divided into five flats – tenant converting back to single house – planning permission for conversions no longer . .
References: [1976] 1 EGLR 215, [1976] 238 EG 421 Links: Coram: W H Rees FRICS Ratio: The Tribunal considered, for the first time the effect of a marriage value in determining the price of the freehold reversion. Held: The marriage value was to be divided equally between the freeholder and tenant applicant. Statutes: Housing Act … Continue reading Norfolk v Trinity College, Cambridge; 1 Apr 1976
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
[2008] EWCA Civ 1593 Bailii Leasehold Reform Act 1967 19 England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.291910
Dispute is about the right to enfranchise under the 1967 Act, which was exercisable in specified circumstances where a ‘building’ is subject to a long lease. The landlord said that the two-storey, long lease building in Palmers Green, which has a greetings card shop on the ground floor with a recently converted flat above, was … Continue reading Henley and Another v Cohen: CA 2 May 2013
Appeals concerned with two preliminary issues, directed by the Lands Tribunal, to determine: (i) ‘the proper deferment rate to be applied to vacant possession value’; and (ii) ‘the proper valuation of any ‘hope value”. A further general issue has been raised as to the status of the Tribunal’s decision in relation to future cases in … Continue reading Cadogan and Another v Sportelli and Another: CA 25 Oct 2007
Judges: Mr Justice Marcus Smith Citations: [2020] EWHC 792 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 17 November 2022; Ref: scu.649956
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – house – freehold enfranchisement price – whether LVT double counted a premium to reflect property’s location in value per square foot for the freehold – whether LVT failed to make allowance for development risk, planning risk and planning costs in assessing development value – Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s.9(1)(C) – appeal … Continue reading Jackson v The Free Grammar School of John Lyon: UTLC 18 Feb 2013
The tenant of a house had subdivided it and let off the flats. He sought to acquire the freehold. Held: Where none of the subtenants themselves had qualifying leases, the head tenant could be in sufficient occupation to be able to buy the freehold. Judges: The Hon Mr Justice Laddie Lord Justice Jonathan Parker Citations: … Continue reading Earl Cadogan, Cadogan Estates Limited v Search Guarantees Plc: CA 27 Jul 2004
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – houses converted to flats – price payable for freehold – whether valuation must assume a sale of freehold reversion on the valuation date – held that it must – yield to be adopted for valuation on investment basis – relativity – appeal dismissed – Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s9(1A) Citations: [2012] … Continue reading Westmacott and Others v Ackerman: UTLC 20 Nov 2012
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – enfranchisement of house – missing landlord and missing 400 year lease – appropriate sum under section 27(5) Leasehold Reform Act 1967 – whether property landlocked – whether new right of way had arisen over separate freehold property owned by the enfranchising tenants. Citations: [2012] UKUT 226 (LC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England … Continue reading Clarke and Others, Re Ballinger Hill House: UTLC 10 Jul 2012
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – costs – award of costs under section 9 of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 – award of costs under rule 10 of The Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal)) (Lands Chamber) Rules 2010 Citations: [2012] UKUT 131 (LC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 01 November 2022; Ref: scu.460257
Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (Missing Landlord) Citations: [2015] UKFTT RP – CHI – 00HC – Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 19 October 2022; Ref: scu.626900
Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (Missing Landlord) Citations: [2015] UKFTT RP – CHI – 00HC – Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 17 October 2022; Ref: scu.626904
Section 21 (A) of The Leasehold Reform Act 1967 Citations: [2015] UKFTT RP – MAN – 00BM – Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 17 October 2022; Ref: scu.626758
Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (Missing Landlord) Citations: [2015] UKFTT RP – CHI – 00HC – Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 17 October 2022; Ref: scu.626911
Judges: Longmore, Rimer LJJ, Warren J Citations: [2011] EWCA Civ 1185 Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 1AA(3) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 25 September 2022; Ref: scu.447612
Houses/Flats – Enfranchisement, Lease Extensions and Compensation for Loss. Application to determine amount to be paid into court under section 9(1) of the 1967 Act. Citations: [2006] EWLVT LON – LV – HEL – 00BE – 0 Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 9(1) 21 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 16 … Continue reading 31 Tower Bridge Road – Southwark : London (Houses/Flats – Enfranchisement, Lease Extensions and Compensation for Loss): LVT 11 May 2006
Citations: [2002] EWLVT 185 Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 21 Landlord and Tenant Updated: 11 September 2022; Ref: scu.439434
The applicant claimed the right to purchase the freehold reversion for her home. The defendant said it was not held under a low rent so as to qualify, since the rent exceeded the rateable value as assessed. The rating list had been altered meantime from the two cottages to one combined listing. Held: Looking at … Continue reading Neville v Cowdray Trust Ltd and Another: CA 5 May 2006
Proper construction of the proviso to section 3(1) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, and its application to the terms of the relevant lease. Citations: [2002] EWCA Civ 424, [2002] 22 EG 137 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 07 September 2022; Ref: scu.170106
Citations: [2002] EWCA Civ 668 Links: Bailii Statutes: Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, Leasehold Reform Act 1967 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant, Costs Updated: 06 September 2022; Ref: scu.217057
Whether the refusal to a tenant of permission to apply for planning permission for change of use of premises was unreasonable. The covenant required the landlord not to withhold consent unreasonably. The landlord feared that this would lead to the tenant being able to apply to purchase the freehold. Judges: Sir Terence Etherton MR, McCombe, … Continue reading Rotrust Nominees Ltd v Hautford Ltd: CA 17 Apr 2018
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – houses – price – whether valuation to be carried out by the usual two-stage approach or in three stages including Haresign addition – held no objection in principle to three stages – appellant’s valuer fails to justify use of Sportelli generic rate by following previous guidance from Tribunal – appeals dismissed … Continue reading Freehold Properties Ltd, Re 42 Elmay Road: UTLC 11 Sep 2009
LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – Leasehold Reform Act 1967 section 9(1A), (1D) and Schedule 1 – enfranchisement by underlessee – unusual terms of head lease – calculation of marriage value – assessment of capitalisation and deferment rates. Citations: [2010] UKUT 69 (LC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 18 August 2022; Ref: scu.415006
LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – house – price – disputed site value – standing house approach – cleared site approach – comparables – site value percentage – whether LVT correct to look at direct evidence of site value by reference to developable space – purchase price determined at pounds 437,000 – appeal dismissed – Leasehold Reform … Continue reading Tsiapkinis v Earl Cadogan: LT 25 Jan 2008
LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – house on Howard de Walden Estate – improvements – building agreement and lease – state of house when lease granted – whether any completion works – whether works part of bargain for grant of lease – price – restrictive covenants as to alterations, user and machinery – appeal dismissed – Leasehold Reform … Continue reading Moreau v De Walden: LT 30 Apr 2003
LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – house – land value and increased ground rent – freehold value at end of lease – appeal allowed – price pounds 625,750 – Leasehold Reform Act 1967, s9(1C) Citations: [2001] EWLands LRA – 11 – 2000 Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 9(1C) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: … Continue reading Stein and Another v Trustees of Eyre Estate: LT 18 May 2001
Judges: Carnwath LJ Citations: [2007] EWCA Civ 1280 Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 9 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Appeal from – Pitts and Another v Cadogan LT 28-Mar-2007 LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – preliminary issues -procedure – deferment rate and hope value – whether respondent on appeal entitled to seek addition for hope … Continue reading Cadogan v Pitts and Another: CA 4 Dec 2007
LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT . . preliminary issues – deferment rate – determination of deferment rate – Arbib v Earl Cadogan considered – deferment rate of 4.75% applied to houses and 5% applied to flats – guidance on this ( hope value – whether hope of releasing share of marriage value relevant in collective enfranchisement – … Continue reading Cadogan and Another v Sportelli and Another: LT 15 Sep 2006
The tenant served a notice of its desire to purchase the freehold. The landlord objected that the property was no longer a house as required under the Act, having become dilapidated and unoccupied. Held: The nature of the occupancy was to be tested as at the date of the issue of the notice and not … Continue reading Boss Holdings Ltd and Another v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd: CA 21 Mar 2006
LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – house – terms of transfer – restrictive covenants – new building and alterations – Leasehold Reform Act 1967, ss 8(1), 10(4)(b)(i) and (5)(a) Citations: [2005] EWLands LRA – 2 – 2005 Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.234999
LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – houses and flats in central London – appeals heard together regarding deferment rate – no convention that 6% established – absence of market evidence – decisions of LVTs and Lands Tribunal – settlements – financial markets – index-linked gilts – appeals allowed – deferment rates of 4.5%, 4.75% and 6.4% applied … Continue reading Arbib v Earl Cadogan: LT 15 Sep 2005
LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – houses and flats in central London – appeals heard together regarding deferment rate – no convention that 6% established – absence of market evidence – decisions of LVTs and Lands Tribunal – settlements – financial markets – index-linked gilts – appeals allowed – deferment rates of 4.5%, 4.75% and 6.4% applied … Continue reading Day and Another v 32 Rosary Gardens (Freehold) Ltd: LT 15 Sep 2005
LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – houses and flats in central London – appeals heard together regarding deferment rate – no convention that 6% established – absence of market evidence – decisions of LVTs and Lands Tribunal – settlements – financial markets – index-linked gilts – appeals allowed – deferment rates of 4.5%, 4.75% and 6.4% applied … Continue reading Cadogan and Another v 55/57 Cadogan Square Freehold Ltd: LT 15 Sep 2005
LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – houses and flats in central London – appeals heard together regarding deferment rate – no convention that 6% established – absence of market evidence – decisions of LVTs and Lands Tribunal – settlements – financial markets – index-linked gilts – appeals allowed – deferment rates of 4.5%, 4.75% and 6.4% applied … Continue reading Cadogan and Another: LT 15 Sep 2005
LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – houses and flats in central London – appeals heard together regarding deferment rate – no convention that 6% established – absence of market evidence – decisions of LVTs and Lands Tribunal – settlements – financial markets – index-linked gilts – appeals allowed – deferment rates of 4.5%, 4.75% and 6.4% applied … Continue reading Cadogan v Moussaieff: LT 15 Sep 2005
LT Leasehold Enfranchisement – Terms of transfer – Leasehold Reform Act 1967, s.10(4) – Covenant not to acquire rights – Section 23 – Material enhancement of value of landlord’s property. Citations: [2005] EWLands LRX – 32 – 2004 Links: Bailii Landlord and Tenant Updated: 30 June 2022; Ref: scu.225854
LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – price payable for freehold interest – valuation methodology – tenants’ improvements – treatment of development value – comparables – Leasehold Reform Act 1967 section 9(1A)(d) – appeal allowed in part – enfranchisement price andpound;1,941,655. Citations: [2004] EWLands LRA – 21 – 2002 Links: Bailii Landlord and Tenant Updated: 30 June 2022; … Continue reading Fattal and Another v Possessions Revenues and Goods of the Free Grammar School of John Lyon: LT 14 Jan 2004
LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – price payable for freehold interest – valuation methodology – tenants’ improvements – treatment of development value – comparables – Leasehold Reform Act 1967 section 9(1A)(d) – appeal allowed in part – enfranchisement price andpound;1,941,655. Citations: [2003] EWLands LRA – 21 – 2002 Links: Bailii Land Updated: 30 June 2022; Ref: scu.225781
LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – price payable for freehold of house – unimproved value – comparable sale – market movement between valuation date of subject property and sale of comparable – Leasehold Reform Act 1967 section 9 – appeal dismissed Citations: [2003] EWLands LRA – 33 – 2002 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant … Continue reading S F Holdings Inc (A Company) v Eyre Estate Trustees: LT 9 Jun 2003
LT LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – Price payable for acquisition of freehold – value attributable freeholder’s opportunity to receive insurance commissions – Leasehold Reform Act 1967 section 9 – Appeal dismissed. Citations: [2001] EWLands LRA – 53 – 2000 Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 9 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 30 June … Continue reading Caplin and Another v Bridge and Another: LT 22 Feb 2001
The claimant occupied a house under a 75 year lease. She obtained an order requiring the landlord to sell the freehold reversion to her, and then set out to sell on her interest. She contracted to sell her interest in the property and her statutory rights, and later purported to assign her rights to the … Continue reading South v Chamberlayne: ChD 7 Sep 2001
Judges: Sir Martin Nourse Lord Justice Buxton Lord Justice Sedley Citations: [2004] EWCA Civ 1530 Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.220227
The tenant served a notice under the Act, but failed to include a full list of the previous linked leases. The landlord said the notice was invalid. Held: The error was not misleading. Such notices had to be viewed in the factual background. That would inform the landlord as necessary. To defeat such a notice … Continue reading Cadogan and Another v Strauss: CA 9 Feb 2004
Work had been carried out by the leaseholders first to convert the property to multiple occupation, and subsequently back to single occupation. The tenant on exercising his right to purchase the freehold, claimed the cost shoud be reduced by the increase in value attributable to the conversion. Held: If the tenant increases the value of … Continue reading John Lyon’s Charity v Shalson: HL 12 Jun 2003
The applicant sought the leasehold enfranchisement of two leasehold properties. They were contained in separate leases, but the property had been treated as one for some time. A part of one property extended under part of the other. The claim was resisted on the basis that there was more than one building as required by … Continue reading Malekshad v Howard De Walden Estates Limited: CA 23 May 2001
For the purposes of the Act, the original construction of a house could not to be considered as ‘any improvement’, which could be disregarded when calculating the amount payable by enfranchising tenants for the transfer of the freehold. The definition made it clear that premises could not exist apart from a house, and therefore a … Continue reading Rosen v Trustees of Camden Charities: CA 30 Nov 2000
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – house – price – condition – improvements – risk of tenant claiming Assured Tenancy- statutory assumptions – appeal allowed in part – Price determined at andpound;152,788 – Leasehold Reform Act 1967 section 9(1), Housing Act 1988 section 14(2)(b) and Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Pt 1 Judges: P R Francis FRICS … Continue reading Sillvote Ltd v Liverpool City Council: UTLC 14 Jun 2010
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – leasehold land adjacent to, and now incorporating, part of an extension to the appellant’s freehold home – value of landlord’s reversion after 50 year extension – marriage value – Leasehold Reform Act 1967 section (9)(1) – price determined at andpound;14,000 Citations: [2009]UKUT 130 (LC) Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 … Continue reading Inglands, Lower Icknield Way, Buckland, Aylesbury, Bucks, Re: UTLC 15 Jul 2009
What is the true interpretation of section 9(1A)(d) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 – a counter-factual deeming provision for the valuation of the freeholder’s interest in a house and premises upon enfranchisement, requiring the price payable for that interest to be diminished by the extent to which its value has been increased by improvements … Continue reading Cadogan Holdings Ltd v Alberti: CA 13 Apr 2022
Judges: Black, Sales, Henderson LJJ Citations: [2017] EWCA Civ 1135 Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 28 March 2022; Ref: scu.591674
Judges: Arden, Briggs, Bean LJJ Citations: [2017] EWCA Civ 846 Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 9, Interpretation Act 1978 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 27 March 2022; Ref: scu.588336
LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – House – basis of valuation – alterations – appropriate day – change of identity – Leasehold Reform Act 1967, sections 1, 9 (1), 9 (1A) – Rent Act 1977, section 25 Citations: [2017] UKUT 74 (LC) Links: Bailii Statutes: Rent Act 1977 25, Leasehold Reform Act 1967 1 9 Jurisdiction: England and … Continue reading Clifton v Liverpool City Council: UTLC 17 Feb 2017
Citations: [2017] EWCA Civ 190 Links: Bailii Statutes: Leasehold Reform Act 1967 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 24 March 2022; Ref: scu.581339
Appeal from an Order on an application for a declaration that the respondent was entitled to acquire the freehold of the house and premises known as 3 Grosvenor Gardens Mews East, London SW1 pursuant to Part 1 of the 1967 Act. Henry Carr J [2015] EWHC 3381 (Ch), [2015] WLR(D) 499 Bailii, WLRD Leasehold Reform … Continue reading West End Investments (Cowell Group) Ltd v Birchlea Ltd: ChD 27 Nov 2015
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – purchase price – deferment rate – flat in Shepherd’s Bush – whether the risks regarding urban cycle and obsolescence justified departure from deferment rate suggested in Earl Cadogan v Sportelli – relativity of value of 72 year lease to the value of freehold – use of graphs – appeal dismissed [2015] … Continue reading Xue v Cherry and Another: UTLC 30 Nov 2015
The court was asked whether a particular property fell within the definition of a ‘house’ for the purposes of the 1967 Act. Patten, Tomlinson, Vos LJJ [2015] EWCA Civ 1111 Bailii Leasehold Reform Act 1967 2(1) England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 05 January 2022; Ref: scu.554105
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – price – rent review clause – whether reviewed rent to be a ‘modern ground rent’ s.15(2) Leasehold Reform Act 1967 – whether rent must be a ‘marketable’ rent – presumption of reality – alternative valuations agreed – appeal dismissed [2014] UKUT 394 (LC) Bailii Leasehold Reform Act 1967 15(2) England and … Continue reading Clarise Properties Ltd v Rees and Another: UTLC 14 Oct 2014
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – purchase price – provision in lease for rent reviews – proper construction of rent review provisions – whether LVT in error in rejecting lessor’s argument that the reviewed rent should have been assessed in the same manner as a modern ground rent under section 15(2) Leasehold Reform Act 1967 – whether … Continue reading Plotnek v Govan: UTLC 8 Sep 2014
LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – price payable – Leasehold Reform Act 1967 section 9(1A) – assessment of an element required in the calculation of price namely the value at the valuation date of the existing lease on the statutory assumptions – relativity of that value to freehold vacant possession value – tenant relying upon evidence of a … Continue reading Kosta v Carnwath and Others: UTLC 2 Jul 2014
Tenants sought to purchase the freehold reversion of their properties under leasehold enfranchisement. The landlord objected that the forms were incomplete and invalid. The tenants accepted that there were defects, but asserted that these were not such as to invalidate the notices. Held: ‘[T]he better approach is to look at the particular statutory provisions pursuant … Continue reading Speedwell Estates Limited and Covent Garden Group Limited v Jane Rush Dalziel and others: CA 31 Jul 2001
The landlords resisted a claim for enfranchisement saying that the appellants were no longer tenants under section 42 of the 1993 Act, the lease having expired. The property was made up of five flats, and was not itself a house. Held: The tenant’s appeal was dismissed. Paragraph 5 of the schedule 12 of the 1993 … Continue reading Ackerman and Another v Lay and others (Portman Estate Nominees (One) Ltd): CA 16 Dec 2008
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT – flats and houses in prime central London – development potential – comparables – adjustments – valuation – development hope value – development value on reversion – appeals allowed in part – s. 9(1C) Leasehold Reform Act 1967 and s. 32 and Sch. 6 Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 … Continue reading John Lyon’s Charity v Alamouti: UTLC 28 Apr 2014
The tenant under the long lease became bankrupt. His receiver served a notice seeking to enfranchise the lease. Held: The notice had been ineffective. Arden, Rimer LJJ, Sir David Keene [2014] EWCA Civ 17, [2014] WLR (D) 20 Bailii, WLRD Leasehold Reform Act 1967 1(1), Land Registration Act 2002 306 England and Wales Landlord and … Continue reading The Free Grammar School of John Lyon (The Keepers and Governors of The Possessions, Revenues and Goods of) v Helman: CA 22 Jan 2014
Determination of the landlords reasonable costs to enfranchise the Freehold interest under section 21 (1) (ba) of the leasehold reform act 1967 [2015] UKFTT RP – BIR – 47UB – Bailii England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 19 November 2021; Ref: scu.626688
The Court considered the provisions for leasehold enfranchisement now that the residence requirement had been removed by the 2002 Act, and in particular the extent to which, at all, it had allowed enfranchisement to be available to commercial buildings. The properties raised two issues: (i) Were the buildings ‘designed or adapted for living in’? And … Continue reading Day and Another v Hosebay Ltd: SC 10 Oct 2012
Properties had been built as substantial single dwellings. Later they had been converted into separate dwellings and let accordingly. The tenants sought to acquire the freeholds under the 1967 Act. Though required by the lease to use the properties as private dwellings, they had been used as short term lets for tourists. The landlord now … Continue reading Day and Another v Hosebay Ltd; Lexgorge Ltd v Howard de Walden Estates Ltd etc: CA 1 Jul 2010
The parties disputed whether a building was a house ‘reasonably so called’ within the 1987 Act. The instant building was designed or adapted for living in, and was divided horizontally into six flats or maisonettes, and included shops. Held: The appeal failed. The words ‘reasonably so called’ are intended to be words of limitation, so … Continue reading Magnohard Ltd v Cadogan and Another: CA 4 May 2012
A house and an adjoining building had been first demised under one lease, then separated vertically. Two separate residential properties now existed. Held: The vertical division meant that the two houses could not be enfranchised as one under the Act. The Act also provided that where a property had been divided in such a way … Continue reading Malekshad v Howard de Walden Estates Limited: HL 5 Dec 2002
UTLC LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT- house – price – entirety value – investment and comparable methods – investment method acceptable subject to appropriate yield – site ratio – settlement evidence and cleared site evidence – 30% adopted – unexpired term – price determined at andpound;19,389 – section 9(1), Leasehold Reform Act 1967 – appeal allowed [2016] UKUT … Continue reading El-Gadhy and Another v Liverpool City Council: UTLC 21 Apr 2016
The parties disputed the effect of a contract between them for the sale of a leasehold property. After exchange the solicitors failed to obtain the landlord’s consent to the proposed assignment as required by the lease. In the meantime the proposed assignees set out to enfranchise the lease under the 1967 Act as envisaged by … Continue reading Alchemy Estates Ltd v Astor and Another: ChD 5 Nov 2008
The tenant under a long lease sought enfranchisement. The landlord denied that it was a ‘house’ reasonably so called within the 1967 Act. The building had been constructed as a house, but was now substantially used as offices. They could only be used under the lease as to 11.5% for residential purposes, the remainder of … Continue reading Grosvenor Estates Ltd v Prospect Estates Ltd: CA 21 Nov 2008
The House considered the basis of valuation on an acquisition of the freehold reversion of a lease under the 1967 Act of the three elements, the rent, vacant possession after the lease, and the marriage or hope value of the two interests when merged, and particularly the last. Held: In relation to a valuation under … Continue reading Earl Cadogan v Pitts and Wang; Similar: HL 10 Dec 2008
The tenant sought to enfranchise the property under the 1967 Act. The freeholders replied that it was not a ‘house’ within the Act at the time of the notice. It had been built in the eighteenth century as a house, but the lower floors had been occupied for many years for business purposes. Recently it … Continue reading Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties and others: HL 30 Jan 2008
In each case all or part of a building was let by a head-lease and then as self-contained units under sub-leases. The head lessees had served notices under the 1993 Act requiring new leases. The freeholder denied that they were qualifying tenants, either because there were a number of flats, or because the lease included … Continue reading Cadogan and others v 26 Cadogan Square Ltd, Howard de Walden Estates Limited v Aggio and others: HL 25 Jun 2008
The parties owned properties part of a building estate. The properties had been held under leases, but those had been enfranchised. The question was as to how the easements granted by the leases were preserved on enfranchisement. A particular . .
Application under subsection 21 (1) (ba) of the Leasehold reform act 1967 for determination of the reasonable costs payable under subection 9 (4) . .
The tenant had occupied the premises under a long lease which expired by effluxion of time. The landlord failed to take any steps to retake possession, and the tenant continued as a tenant at will, paying no rent. The landlord eventually issued . .