The Tribunal considered, for the first time the effect of a marriage value in determining the price of the freehold reversion.
Held: The marriage value was to be divided equally between the freeholder and tenant applicant.
W H Rees FRICS
[1976] 1 EGLR 215, [1976] 238 EG 421, (1976) 32 P and CR 147
Housing Act 1974 118, Leasehold Reform Act 1967
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Official Custodian for Charities v Goldridge CA 1973
The social policy underlying the 1967 Act is that ‘the land belongs in equity to the landowner and the house belongs in equity to the occupying leaseholder.’ . .
Cited by:
Applied – Lloyd-Jones v Church Commissioners for England 1982
The tenant’s lease had about twelve years unexpired and was at a rent of andpound;45 per annum. The valuation of the landlord’s reversionary freehold interest involved two stages. The first stage was to assess the so-called investment value of the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Landlord and Tenant
Leading Case
Updated: 31 October 2021; Ref: scu.278770
