Nemzeti Fogyasztovedelmi Hatosag v Invitel Tavkozlesi Zrt: ECJ 6 Dec 2011

ECJ Opinion – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 3(1) in combination with points 1(j) and 2(d) of the annex – Articles 6 and 7 – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Contract term that entitles the seller or supplier to amend contractual provisions unilaterally without a valid reason and without explicitly describing the method by which prices vary – Unfair nature of the term – Legal effects of a finding that a term is unfair as a result of an action in the public interest – Actio popularis – Erga omnes effect of national findings of unfairness

Trstenjak AG
[2011] EUECJ C-472/10
Bailii
European
Cited by:
OpinionNemzeti Fogyasztovedelmi Hatosag v Invitel Tavkozlesi Zrt ECJ 26-Apr-2012
ECJ Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 3(1) and (3) – Articles 6 and 7 – Consumer contracts – Unfair terms – Unilateral amendment of the terms of a contract by a seller or supplier – Action for an injunction brought . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Consumer, Contract

Updated: 24 January 2022; Ref: scu.570505