Monro v HM Revenue and Customs: CA 9 Apr 2008

The Commissioners conceded that, in principle, there could be a common law right to recover sums paid by way of tax under a mistake of law, but argued that such a claim was precluded because it would be inconsistent with the statutory scheme under section 33 of the Taxes Management Act 1970.
Held: The argument succeeded. The common law claim was held to be excluded by a statutory scheme for the recovery of tax, since it would be inconsistent with the purpose of the scheme.
Mummery LJ, Arden LJ, Longmore LJ
[2008] EWCA Civ 306, [2008] STC 1815, [2008] 3 WLR 734, [2009] Ch 69, [2008] STI 1197, [2008] BTC 188
Bailii
Taxes Management Act 1970 33
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedChild Poverty Action Group, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary Of State for Work and Pensions CA 14-Oct-2009
CPAG appealed against a refusal of a declaration that the respondent could use only the 1992 Act to recover overpayment of benefits where there had been neither misrepresentation nor non-disclosure.
Held: The appeal succeeded, and the court . .
CitedRevenue and Customs v The Investment Trust Companies SC 11-Apr-2017
Certain investment trust companies (ITCs) sought refunds of VAT paid on the supply of investment management services. EU law however clarified that they were not due. Refunds were restricted by the Commissioners both as to the amounts and limitation . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 15 February 2021; Ref: scu.266518