Laythoarp v Bryant; 30 Apr 1936

References: [1836] 3 Scott 238, [1836] EngR 652, (1836) 2 Bing NC 735, (1836) 132 ER 283
Links: Commonlii
Coram: Tindal CJ
Ratio: The Defendant purchased certain leasehold premises at an auction, and signed a memorandum of the purchase on the back of a paper containing the particulars of the premises, the name of the owner, and the conditions of sale: Held, that the Defendant was bound by his contract, notwithstanding it was not signed by the vendor.
Tindal CJ defined ‘consideration’: ‘Any act of the plaintiff from which the defendant derives a benefit or advantage, or any labour, detriment, or inconvenience sustained by the plaintiff,provided such act is performed or such inconvenience suffered by the plaintiff, with the consent, either express or implied, of the defendant.’
This case cites:

  • Appeal from – Laythoarp v Bryant (, Commonlii, [1835] EngR 383, (1835) 1 Bing NC 421, (1835) 131 ER 1179)
    Plaintiff put up to sale by auction a lease of premises, which he occupied as assignee of the lease, stipulation not to produce any title prior to the lease. In an action against a purchaser for not completing his purchase, in which action Plaintiff . .

(This list may be incomplete)
This case is cited by:

  • Cited – Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co CA ([1893] 1 QB 256, [1892] 4 All ER Rep 127, [1892] 62 LJ QB 257, [1892] 67 LT 837, [1892] 57 JP 325, [1892] 41 WR 210, [1892] 9 TLR 124, [1892] 4 R 176, lip, Hamlyn, Justis, Bailii, [1892] EWCA Civ 1)
    The defendants advertised ‘The Carbolic Smoke Ball,’ in the Pall Mall Gazette, saying ‘£100 reward will be paid by the Carbolic Smoke Ball Company to any person who contracts the increasing epidemic influenza, colds, or any disease caused by . .

(This list may be incomplete)

Last Update: 29-Aug-16
Ref: 267731