The claimant investment Trust companies sought repayment of taxes paid in error by way of restitution.
Held: The range of the the law of restitution to recover any tax unlawfully exacted was to be be restricted to those situations where the sums paid to the public authority were so paid in fulfilment of an apparent statutory requirement to do so.
Judges:
Henderson J
Citations:
[2013] EWHC 665 (Ch), [2013] WLR(D) 125
Links:
Statutes:
Value Added Tax Act 1994 80(7)
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Principle Judgment – Investment Trust Companies v HM Revenue and Customs ChD 2-Mar-2012
The claimant had properly accounted for VAT on its transactions for many years, but a decision of the European court had latterly ruled that the services were exempt. The claimant sought restitution from HMRC, who responded by arguing that . .
Cited by:
AT ChD (2) – Investment Trust Companies v Revenue and Customs CA 12-Feb-2015
The claimants having sought repayment of overpaid VAT, they now complained of sums deducted by the Revenue.
Held: The Court allowed the Lead Claimants’ appeal, to the extent of the notional pounds 75 paid in respect of dead periods, and . .
At ChD (2) – Revenue and Customs v The Investment Trust Companies SC 11-Apr-2017
Certain investment trust companies (ITCs) sought refunds of VAT paid on the supply of investment management services. EU law however clarified that they were not due. Refunds were restricted by the Commissioners both as to the amounts and limitation . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
VAT, Equity
Updated: 26 July 2022; Ref: scu.472042
