The turn-out at the creditors meeting was low in number (35 out of 971) but creditors with claims worth about 41% of the total value attended the meeting.
Held: Neuberger J said: ‘It is true that the numbers of those who voted was pretty small compared to the number of those entitled to vote, but that is by no means unusual in the context of votes at meetings called pursuant to s 425. In any event, that does not call into question the fact that not a single scheme creditor thought it right to vote against the scheme. Furthermore, if one looks at the value of the scheme claims held by those who voted, they did represent a substantial proportion of those entitled to vote.’
Judges:
Neuberger J
Citations:
[1991] 1 BCLC 182
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Cape Plc and Others, Re Companies Act 1985 ChD 16-Jun-2006
The court was asked to sanction a scheme of arrangements, and particularly to approve a proposed scheme which itself contained the power to make amendments to the scheme.
Held: The court did have power to sanction such a proposed scheme of . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Company
Updated: 31 March 2022; Ref: scu.244200
