HM Attorney General v Bruce: EAT 31 Jan 2006

EAT Practice and Procedure: Restriction of Proceedings Order/Vexatious Litigant
Litigant who had instituted 78 applications containing 80 claims, only two of which were successful, made subject to a Restriction Order. Court did not accept that he was entitled to make a claim that he had been discriminated against simply upon rejection at interview.


Langstaff J


[2006] UKEAT 0586 – 05 – 3101, UKEAT/0586/05


Bailii, EAT


Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.240211