Caspersz v Ministry of Defence: EAT 3 Feb 2006

EAT Practice and Procedure – Appellate jurisdiction/Reasons/Burns-Barke – Sex Discrimination – Vicarious liability. ET held entitled to find s.41(3) SDA defence made out where they found that the employer had a good policy, which was not just paid lip service to but was observed, so that the employer had taken such reasonably practicable steps to prevent sexual comments being made by a manager to his junior.


The Honourable Mr Justice Langstaff


UKEAT/0599/05, [2006] UKEAT 0599 – 05 – 0302


Bailii, EAT

Employment, Discrimination

Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.240229