EAT SEX DISCRIMINATION: Continuing act
JURISDICTIONAL POINTS: Extension of time: just and equitable
There was no error of law or perversity in the judgment of the Employment Tribunal that the dismissal of Mr Grimshaw was not part of a continuing act of discrimination and that, apart from that relating to dismissal, his complaints of discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, harassment and victimisation were out of time. Nor did the Tribunal err in concluding that this was not a case where it should exercise its discretion under Regulation 34(4) of the Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003 to consider the claims.
Judges:
Slade J
Citations:
[2008] UKEAT 0299 – 08 – 2511
Links:
Statutes:
Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003 34(4)
Employment, Discrimination
Updated: 22 July 2022; Ref: scu.279939
