Garrett v Halton Borough Council: CA 18 Jul 2006


[2007] 1 WLR 554, [2006] EWCA Civ 1017




Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 58, Access to Justice Act 1999 27(1)


England and Wales


CitedMountain v Hastings CA 16-Apr-1993
The tenant disputed the effect of a notice to quit. Paragraph 3 of the form read: ‘The landlord intends to seek possession on grounds . . in Schedule 2 to the Housing Act 1988, which reads: Give the full text of each ground which is being relied on. . .

Cited by:

See AlsoGarrett v Halton Borough Council CA 16-Mar-2007
The defendants argued that the conditional fee agreement in use by the claimant’s solicitors was void and so in breach of the rules.
Held: In assessing whether there was any ‘interest’ for the purposes of the Regulation, the court looked to . .
CitedJones v Wrexham Borough Council CA 19-Dec-2007
The claimant appealed against a decision that the conditional fee agreement with her solicitors had been unenforceable because the solicitors had not disclosed to her a conflicting interest in recommending insurers. The issue was whether the CFA was . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Legal Professions, Costs

Updated: 07 July 2022; Ref: scu.243301