De Molestina v Ponton: 2002

The claimants sought partial rescision of agreements of compromise of disputes within the etsate on the basis that agreement had been obtained by fraud.
Held: Recission of part only of an agreement was not possible.

Citations:

[2002] 1 LL Rep 271

Citing:

See alsoMolestina and others v Ponton and others ComC 21-Nov-2002
The parties challenged agreements compromising claims on the estate of the deceased, saying they had been obtained by misrepresentations.
Held: The claimants did not establish that the representations claimed had in fact been made. . .

Cited by:

See alsoMolestina and others v Ponton and others ComC 21-Nov-2002
The parties challenged agreements compromising claims on the estate of the deceased, saying they had been obtained by misrepresentations.
Held: The claimants did not establish that the representations claimed had in fact been made. . .
CitedIslamic Republic of Pakistan v Zardari and others ComC 6-Oct-2006
The claimant alleged that the defendants had funded the purchase of various properties by secret and unlawful commissions taken by them whilst in power in Pakistan. They sought to recover the proceeds. They now sought permission to serve proceedings . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Wills and Probate

Updated: 30 April 2022; Ref: scu.200645