Cooke v Oxley; 14 May 1790

References: [1790] EngR 2367, (1790) 3 TR 653, (1790) 100 ER 785 (B)
Links: Commonlii
A. having proposed to sell goods to B., gave him a, certain time at his request to determine whether he would buy them or not; B. within the time determined to buy them, and gave notice thereof to A. ; yet A. was not liable in an action for not delivering them, for B. not being bound by the original contract, there was no consideration to bind A.
This case is cited by:

  • Explained – Byrne -v- van Tienhoven & Co ((1880) 5 CPD 344 (CP))
    The defendant offered by a letter to the plaintiffs to sell them goods at a certain price. They later wrote to the plaintiffs to withdraw the offer. Before they knew of the revocation, the plaintiffs accepted the offer by telegram. The defendants . .