The claimant was ordered to return to Zimbabwe to make her asylum claim from there. She argued that it would infringe her human rights. She now had a young daughter here. The IAT had dismissed her appeal on the basis that the appellant could and should return to Zimbabwe to apply there for entry clearance to return to the UK. They believed that her separation from her husband (who they accepted faced ‘an insurmountable obstacle to his own return to Zimbabwe’) would be for ‘a relatively short period’.
Held: Her appeal failed. Auld LJ said ‘[T]he fact that someone who has arrived in this country without the required entry clearance may be able to show that he would have been entitled to one does not, in the absence of exceptional circumstances, allow him to remain here without it.’
Judges:
Auld LJ, Jonathan Parker and Lloyd LJJ
Citations:
[2005] EWCA Civ 1779
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – EB (Kosovo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department HL 25-Jun-2008
The claimant arrived as a child from Kosovo in 1999. He said that the decision after so long, it would breach his human rights now to order his return.
Held: The adjudicator had failed to address the effect of delay. That was a relevant . .
Appeal from – Chikwamba v Secretary of State for the Home Department HL 25-Jun-2008
The appellant had fled Zimbabwe. Though her asylum application was refused, she was not returned for the temporary suspension of such orders to Zimbabwe. In the meantime she married and had a child. She now appealed an order for her removal citing . .
Cited – SB (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department CA 31-Jan-2007
A Bangladeshi woman entered into an arranged polygamous marriage in Bangladesh and many years later dishonestly (led by her husband) obtained entry clearance as a visitor before then unsuccessfully seeking leave to remain as being financially . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Immigration, Human Rights, Children
Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.238607
