Chambers-Mills v Allied Bakeries: EAT 18 Nov 2008

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Striking-out/dismissal
The Appellant appealed a strike out order, but the correct authority (Blockbuster) was applied and there was (i) no perversity in the ET’s findings of fact, nor any other challengeable basis in law (ii) no vitiated discretion in refusing an adjournment in the light of those findings.
Burton J
[2008] UKEAT 0165 – 08 – 1811
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal fromChambers-Mills v Allied Bakeries CA 26-Nov-2009
The claimant renewed orally her request for leave to appeal against the EAT which had upheld loss of her claim, after the Employment Tribunal had found her conduct of the proceedings unreasonable in failing to co-operate in a medical enquiry into . .
At EATChambers-Mills v Allied Bakeries CA 21-Feb-2011
The claimant appealed against the strike out of her case for failing to comply with an order requiring her to submit to medical examination and otherwise to pursue her disability discrimination claim.
Held: The claimant’s further application . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 15 February 2021; Ref: scu.278807