NLB Leasing (Judgment): ECJ 2 Jul 2015

ECJ Judgment – Reference for a preliminary ruling – VAT – Directive 2006/112/EC – Supply of goods or services – Lease agreement – Return of immovable property that is the subject-matter of a lease agreement to the lessor – Concept of ‘cancellation, refusal or total or partial non-payment’ – Lessor’s right to a reduction of the taxable amount – Double taxation – Separate supplies – Principle of fiscal neutrality

C-209/14, [2015] EUECJ C-209/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:440
Bailii
Directive 2006/112/EC
European

VAT

Updated: 02 January 2022; Ref: scu.550006

The Belgian State v De Fruytier: ECJ 2 Jul 2015

ECJ Judgment – Reference for a preliminary ruling – Sixth VAT Directive – Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest – Article 13(A)(1)(b) and (c) – Hospital and medical care – Closely related activities – Activity of transporting human organs and samples of human origin for the purposes of medical analysis or medical or therapeutic care – Self-employed activity – Hospitals, centres for medical treatment and diagnosis – Establishment of a similar nature

C-334/14, [2015] EUECJ C-334/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:437
Bailii
European

VAT

Updated: 02 January 2022; Ref: scu.549992

Revenue and Customs v The Rank Group Plc: SC 8 Jul 2015

The question raised by this appeal is whether, during the period 1 October 2002 to 5 December 2005, the takings on a particular category of gaming machines operated by the appellants were subject to VAT. The answer depends on whether the takings resulted from the provision of a ‘gaming machine’ as defined in Note (3), more particularly whether for the purposes of that definition the element of chance in the game was ‘provided by means of the machine’. If not, the takings were exempt.
Lord Carnwath said: ‘The relevant phrase is ‘the element of chance in the game is provided by means of the machine’. In the words of Norris J, it is ‘the determining event which governs the outcome of the game being played on the machine . . which the player is playing’. Chance is the possibility of something happening, not in the abstract, but for a particular player in the context of a particular game; in other words, the possibility of that player getting the combination of numbers which wins a prize or conversely a combination which does not.
Here what determines the outcome of the game is the pressing of a button (or pulling a lever) on the terminal. The pressing of the lever is a more sophisticated equivalent of a player rolling a dice. In that context, it can fairly be said, the winning number is produced ‘by means of’ the player’s action in throwing the dice. So here the RNG produces a pre-programmed sequence of numbers which changes very rapidly. The element of chance in any game is provided ‘by means of’ the action of the particular player in pressing the button and so interrupting that ever-changing sequence at a particular moment. The terminal is not simply communicating information from the RNG, but is the active means by which the winning or losing combination is generated. The RNG is a necessary part of that process, but its response (wherever situated) is entirely automatic. In those circumstances, it is a fair use of language in my view, and consistent with the apparent policy of the legislation, to describe the element of chance as provided ‘by means of’ the terminal.’

Lord Neuberger, President, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath, Lord Toulson, Lord Hodge
[2015 UKSC 48, [2015] WLR(D) 299, [2015] STC 1921, [2015] 4 All ER 77, [2015] LLR 665, [2015] BVC 31, [2015] 1 WLR 3472, [2015] STI 2395, UKSC 2013/0257
Bailii, WLRD, SC, SC Summ, Bailii Summary
England and Wales
Citing:
At VDT (1)The Rank Group Plc v Revenue and Customs VDT 27-May-2008
VDT EXEMPT SUPPLIES – Gaming – Mechanised cash bingo under Gaming Act 1968 s.14 excluded from exemption – Similar supplies under s.21 exempt – Whether principle of fiscal neutrality infringed – Same company . .
At VDT (2)Rank Group Ltd v Revenue and Customs VDT 19-Aug-2008
VDT COMMUNITY LAW – Fiscal neutrality – Exemption – Gaming – Provision of gaming machines excluded from exemption – Similar supplies under Part III of Gaming Act 1968 exempt – Whether principle of fiscal . .
At ChDRevenue and Customs v The Rank Group ChD 8-Jun-2009
The court was asked whether the VAT treatment of mechanised cash bingo breaches the principle of fiscal neutrality: and the core issue on the appeal is whether the burden lay on Rank to adduce evidence to prove not only that there was a difference . .
At FTTTxThe Rank Group Plc v Revenue and Customs FTTTx 11-Dec-2009
FTTTx Community Law – Fiscal neutrality – Exemption – Exclusion of provision of ‘gaming machines’ from exemption – Whether taxed machines similar to exempt machines – Relevance of regulatory regime – TNT [2009] . .
At ECJ (1)Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Rank Group plc C-260/10 ECJ 10-Nov-2011
ECJ Taxation – Sixth VAT Directive – Exemptions – Article 13B(f) – Betting, lotteries and other forms of gambling – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Mechanised cash bingo – Slot machines – Administrative practice . .
At ECJ (2)Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Rank Group plc C-259/10 ECJ 10-Nov-2011
ECJ Taxation – Sixth VAT Directive – Exemptions – Article 13B(f) – Betting, lotteries and other forms of gambling – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Mechanised cash bingo – Slot machines – Administrative practice . .
At UTTCHMRC v The Rank Group Plc UTTC 4-Oct-2012
Taxation – whether gaming or betting and the different VAT Treatment of newer gaming machines. . .
CitedRegina v Herrod, ex parte Leeds City District Council CA 1976
Lord Denning MR described the game bingo: ‘I expect that everybody knows ordinary bingo. It is played at bazaars, sales of work [sic: in [1976] 1 All ER 273, at 279c, the phrase is ‘places of work’], and so forth, for small prizes and is perfectly . .
CitedMarks and Spencer plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise ECJ 11-Jul-2002
The claimant challenged the reduction of the limitation period from six years to three for the reclaiming of overpaid VAT with immediate effect, depriving it of the opportunity to recover sums paid in excess. The company sold vouchers. It paid VAT . .
CitedHalifax plc etc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise ECJ 21-Feb-2006
ECJ Sixth VAT Directive – Article 2(1), Article 4(1) and (2), Article 5(1) and Article 6(1) – Economic activity – Supplies of goods – Supplies of services – Abusive practice – Transactions designed solely to . .
CitedRevenue and Customs v Procter and Gamble UK CA 20-May-2009
The court was asked whether Pringles are ‘similar to potato crisps and made from the potato?’ Toulson LJ discussed the need for appellate courts to respect the special knowledge of tribunals: ‘Where a Tribunal has taken into account all relevant . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

VAT, European

Updated: 02 January 2022; Ref: scu.549909

Sarwar and Sons Knitwear Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 29 Oct 2009

FTTTX MISDECLARATION PENALTY – Commissioners’ assessments to recover overpaid input tax based upon invalid invoices – Appellant allegedly ignorant of the flaws – was there a reasonable excuse? – no – appeal dismissed
COSTS – withdrawal of appeals when Appellant’s representative was alerted to the flaws in invoices – application for partial costs – application dismissed

Lady Mitting
[2009] UKFTT 281 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 02 January 2022; Ref: scu.409086

Ulster Metal Refiners Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 2 Jun 2015

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – input tax – MTIC fraud – credit for input tax denied on grounds that the appellant knew or should have known that its transactions were connected with fraud – deal chains – whether connection with fraud established – whether appellant knew or should have known of connection with fraud – yes – appeal dismissed

[2015] UKFTT 255 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.549555

Oak Tree Motor Homes Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 8 Jun 2015

FTTTx VAT – zero rating – Item 1, Group 9, Schedule 8 VATA 94 – whether zero rating applicable to ‘caravans’ exceeding a certain size applies to vehicles commonly known as ‘motor caravans’, ‘motor homes’ or ‘camper vans’ – held no – appeal dismissed

[2015] UKFTT 251 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.549546

Swanfield Ltd and Others v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 9 Jun 2015

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – default surcharge – allocation of payments – whether VAT due at time of payments – whether surcharges plainly unfair – if so, whether within state’s margin of appreciation – whether poor financial position of companies a reasonable excuse for late payment as a consequence of financing arrangements – no – whether sufficient evidence as to financial position – no – whether appropriate to consider in the alternative the question of lateness of returns – yes, if reasonable excuse for late payment had been established – appeals dismissed, subject to reductions of certain surcharges

[2015] UKFTT 274 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.549553

Harris v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 9 Jun 2015

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – transfer of a business as a going concern – grant of land – option to tax – Article 5(2A) VAT (Special Provisions) Order 1995 – requirement for exercise by transferee at the date of grant – whether belated notification effective for the purposes of Article 5(2A) – appeal dismissed

[2015] UKFTT 265 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.549544

Merlin Scientific Llp v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 4 Jun 2015

FTTTx VAT – input tax- whether part in respect of supply of corporate meeting services disallowable on basis of an apportionment to business entertainment – ss 24 to 26 VATA 1994 – Article 5 VAT (Input Tax) Order 1992
INCOME TAX – whether costs described as being for corporate meeting services disallowable as business entertaining – ss 34 and 45 ITTOIA 2005

[2015] UKFTT 247 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT, Income Tax

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.549543

Thomas T/A The Stableyard v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 9 Jun 2015

FTTTx Vat – Penalties : Misdeclaration – VAT – penalties – input tax – ‘flat rate scheme’ – meaning of ‘carelessness’- failure to apply ‘appropriate percentage’ to VAT-inclusive ‘relevant turnover’ – HMRC officer mistakenly confirms method applied correct – whether appellant careless- no – appellant claiming input tax credit for services received – whether appellant careless – yes – appeal allowed in part

[2015] UKFTT 276 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.549551

Zombory-Moldovan (T/A Craft Carnival) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 29 May 2015

FTTTx VAT – Craft fairs organised by appellant – General public charged admission – Space sold to stallholders to sell their products – Whether supply to stallholders an exempt supply of a licence to occupy land or composite supplies of taxable services comprising of the organisation of a craft fair – Appeal allowed

[2015] UKFTT 245 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.549519

Revenue and Customs v Newey (T/A Ocean Finance): UTTC 2 Jun 2015

VAT – scheme to avoid irrecoverable input tax on supplies of advertising services to loan broking business – establishment of loan broking business in Jersey with processing services provided by UK business – whether UK business made supplies of loan broking services – whether scheme an abuse – F-tT decision holding supplies of advertising services made to Jersey business and no abuse – HMRC’s appeal dismissed

[2015] UKUT 300 (TCC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.549101

Revenue and Customs v The Open University: UTTC 21 May 2015

UTTC VAT – whether services supplied by BBC to Open University exempt under Article 13A(1)(i) of the Sixth VAT Directive – appeal on law from decision of First-tier Tribunal that services were exempt – was BBC a body governed by public law? – no – did BBC have educational aim required by Article 13A(1)(i)? – yes – was BBC other organisation defined by United Kingdom as having similar objects? – yes – appeal dismissed

[2015] UKUT 263 (TCC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.549098

Revenue and Customs v Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health and Another: UTTC 28 Jan 2015

VAT – Art 5, VAT (Special Provisions) Order 1995 – sale of freehold property with an agreement for a tenancy – tenant introduced by purchaser – whether transfer of a going concern – whether assessment within the period set by s73(6)(b) VATA 1995 – approach on appeal to record of evidence before the FTT

[2015] UKUT 38 (TCC), [2015] STC 1243
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.549065

S and I Electrical Plc v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 31 Mar 2015

UTTC Value added tax – Input tax – Disallowance of input tax – Missing trader intra-Community fraud – Transactions connected with fraudulent evasion of value added tax – Trader denied entitlement to deduct input tax on basis of connection with fraudulent transactions – Tribunal finding that the only reasonable conclusion was that the trader knew or should have known it was that transactions were connected with fraud although 11 of 90 transactions not positively proved to be so connected – Tribunal finding denial of input tax permissible only to level of value added tax fraudulently evaded – Whether tribunal in error and comparator with indicia of legitimate trades necessary.

[2015] UKUT 162 (TCC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.549082

Revenue and Customs v Southern Cross Employment Agency Ltd: UTTC 1 Apr 2015

VAT – whether section 80 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 prevents HMRC from entering into a binding compromise agreement for the repayment of money paid by way of VAT – whether any such agreement was ultra vires and so void – whether such an agreement was concluded on the facts

[2015] UKUT 122 (TCC), [2015] STC 1933, [2015] BVC 513, [2015] STI 1562
Bailii
Value Added Tax Act 1994 80
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.549086

Ingenious Games Llp and Others v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 5 Mar 2015

UTTC VAT – sale of motor car on part-exchange terms – price of part-exchange car includes ‘over-allowance’ – value of supply of replacement car – periods prior to 1 August 1992 – s 10 VATA 1983 – application of ‘open market value’ – whether such value of replacement car should reflect a discount on a cash sale equivalent to the amount of the over-allowance – no – appeal dismissed

[2015] UKUT 105 (TCC), [2015] BVC 511, [2015] STC 1620
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.549076

N and M Walkingshaw Ltd v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 18 Mar 2015

UTTC VAT – sale of motor car on part-exchange terms – price of part-exchange car includes ‘over-allowance’ – value of supply of replacement car – periods prior to 1 August 1992 – s 10 VATA 1983 – application of ‘open market value’ – whether such value of replacement car should reflect a discount on a cash sale equivalent to the amount of the over-allowance – no – appeal dismissed

[2015] UKUT 123 (TCC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.549078

Medical Protection Society Ltd, Regina (On the Application of) v HM Revenue and Customs: Admn 6 Nov 2009

Application for judicial review of a decision by the Defendants to require the Claimant to account for value added tax (‘VAT’) for a period of three years under the so-called reverse charge provisions contained in s. 8 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 in respect of legal services provided in other jurisdictions and paid for by MPS.

Sales J
[2009] EWHC 2780 (Admin), [2010] STC 555, [2009] BVC 943, [2009] STI 2894
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.377843

Lisboagas GDL v Autoridade Tributaria e Aduaneira: ECJ 11 Jun 2015

ECJ Judgment – References for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 9, 73, 78, first paragraph, point (a), and 79, first paragraph, point (c) – Taxable amount – Inclusion of the amount of municipal land use taxes paid by the company holding the concession for the gas distribution network in the taxable amount for VAT applicable to supplies of services made by that company to the company responsible for marketing the gas

C-256/14, [2015] EUECJ C-256/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:387
Bailii
Directive 2006/112/EC

European, VAT

Updated: 30 December 2021; Ref: scu.548122

Stringfellow v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Repayments : Vat – Repayments): FTTTx 12 May 2015

VAT – recovery assessment – s 80(4A) VATA 1994 – Fleming claim – transfer of a going concern – whether entitlement to claim passed on transfer – VATA (General) Regulations 1980 regulations (4)-(8) – no – appeal dismissed

[2015] UKFTT 209 (TC)
Bailii
Value Added Tax Act 1994 80(4A)
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 30 December 2021; Ref: scu.547419

Savage (T/A Wheels Abroad) v Revenue and Customs (Customs Duty : Reliefs): FTTTx 7 May 2015

FTTTx Import Duty and Value Added Tax – Whether re-importation of German manufactured cars, that had been exported to the USA, into the UK for re-export back to Germany attracted Returned Goods Relief from import duty and onward supply relief for VAT purposes – Appeal allowed in part

[2015] UKFTT 199 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT, Customs and Excise

Updated: 30 December 2021; Ref: scu.547417

Iqbal v Revenue and Customs (Procedure): FTTTx 13 May 2015

FTTTx PROCEDURE – Rule 8(2) – Application to strike out Notice of Appeal on mandatory basis – Value Added Tax Act 1994 section 83 – Whether a certain letter constituted an appealable matter – No – Whether Tribunal had jurisdiction in relation to the proceedings- No – Whether Notice of Appeal should be struck out – Yes – Appeal struck-out

[2015] UKFTT 215 (TC)
Bailii
Value Added Tax Act 1994 83
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 30 December 2021; Ref: scu.547402

North and South Groundwork Services Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Input Tax : Other): FTTTx 13 May 2015

FTTTx VAT: input tax refused as invoices stated not to sufficiently describe the goods and services supplied; assessment raised in respect of the disallowed input tax; VAT Regulations 1995, regulations 29, 13(1) and 14(1); whether additional information sufficient to identify the work undertaken – yes..

[2015] UKFTT 207 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 30 December 2021; Ref: scu.547412

SMK kft v Nemzeti Ado- es Vamhivatal Del-alfoldi Regionalis Ado Foigazgatosag: ECJ 30 Apr 2015

ECJ (Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax -Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 52(c) and 55 – Determination of the place of supply of services – Recipient of the service identified for value added tax purposes in several Member States – Dispatch or transport out of the Member State in which the service has been physically carried out

Caoimh, P
C-97/14, [2015] EUECJ C-97/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:290
Bailii
European

VAT

Updated: 30 December 2021; Ref: scu.546226

Pet Street Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 6 Apr 2010

INPUT TAX – voluntary registration – pre-registration supplies – whether subsequent backdating possible – VATA Sch 1 para 9 – no backdating permitted. Software – whether goods or services – disallowance of input tax on supplies of services made more than six months before registration – VAT Regulations 1995 reg 111(2) – appeal dismissed

[2010] UKFTT 149 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 30 December 2021; Ref: scu.422197

Sophie Holdings Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 30 Jul 2009

Value added Tax – Assessments under s.73 (2) VATA 1994 – Time limit for making assessments – Date when evidence of facts sufficient in the Commissioners’ opinion to justify making assessment, came to their notice – S.73 (6)(b) 1994 – Assessments out of time – Appeal allowed

[2009] UKFTT 189 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 30 December 2021; Ref: scu.409012

Property Development Company NV v Belgische Staat: ECJ 23 Apr 2015

ECJ (Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Sixth VAT Directive – Article 11A – Application of goods treated as a supply for consideration – Application of a building for an activity exempt from VAT – Taxable amount for that application – Interim interest paid during the construction of the building

C-16/14, [2015] EUECJ C-16/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:265
Bailii

European, VAT

Updated: 29 December 2021; Ref: scu.546111

GST – Sarviz Ag Germania: ECJ 23 Apr 2015

ECJ (Judgment) Common system of value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Person liable for payment of VAT – Erroneous payment of VAT by the person to whom the supply is made – Liability to VAT of the supplier of services – Refusal to grant the supplier of services a refund of the VAT

S. Rodin, P
C-111/14, [2015] EUECJ C-111/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:267
Bailii
Directive 2006/112/EC

European, VAT

Updated: 29 December 2021; Ref: scu.546108

Macikowski v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Gdansku: ECJ 26 Mar 2015

ECJ (Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax – Principles of proportionality and fiscal neutrality – Taxation of a supply of immovable property in a procedure for compulsory sale by auction – National legislation requiring the court enforcement officer executing such a sale to calculate and pay VAT on the transaction – Payment of the purchase price to the competent court and need for the VAT to be paid to be transferred by that court to the court enforcement officer – Liability for damages and criminal liability of the court enforcement officer for non-payment of VAT – Difference between the general statutory time-limit for the payment of VAT by a taxable person and the time-limit imposed on the court enforcement officer – Impossibility of deducting the input VAT paid

A. Tizzano, P
C-499/13, [2015] EUECJ C-499/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:201
Bailii

VAT, European

Updated: 29 December 2021; Ref: scu.545367

BTS Specialised Equipment Ltd and Another v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 24 Mar 2015

FTTTx VAT -input tax – MTIC fraud – direct tax losses and losses through contra-traders – whether tax losses established – yes – whether losses due to fraudulent evasion – yes – whether appellants transactions connected to fraudulent losses – yes – whether appellants had knowledge of connection of fraudulent losses – yes – appeal dismissed.

[2015] UKFTT 136 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 29 December 2021; Ref: scu.545095

Megantic Services Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 17 Mar 2015

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – MTIC – whether connection to fraud established via direct tax loss chains and contra-trading chains – yes – whether the Appellant knew or should have known of the connection – yes – whether alternatively input tax on supplies to the Appellant in relation to which the consideration remained unpaid after 6 months should be disallowed pursuant to s.26A VATA – yes – appeal dismissed

[2015] UKFTT 120 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 28 December 2021; Ref: scu.544585

Colour Blast Ltd and Another v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 2 Mar 2015

FTTTx VAT – Repayment claims for periods 06/12 and 09/12 for Colour Blast Ltd amounting to andpound;20,931.50 and for the periods 05/12 and 08/12 for Sunlight Optical Ltd amounting to andpound;23,590.61 – daughter commencing new companies – equipment and frames supplied by 15 of father’s companies- transactions orchestrated by father – father and daughter knew that transactions were fraudulent – failure by father to pay VAT due in 15 supplier companies giving rise to tax losses – case dismissed.

[2015] UKFTT 98 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 28 December 2021; Ref: scu.544574

Mistral Promotions and Marketing (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 11 Mar 2015

FTTTx VAT – Requirement of security for VAT – VAT debt and non-compliance of company carrying out similar business whose director was also director of the appellant – decision flawed for lack of reasons and for failure to consider whether appeal against assessment against previous company had been withdrawn – decision not otherwise unreasonable-if further decision were to be directed requiring the flaws to be corrected inevitable that security would still be required – appeal dismissed

[2015] UKFTT 112 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 28 December 2021; Ref: scu.544586

Finds You Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 24 Feb 2015

FTTTx VAT – input tax – supply of services in relation to the raising of equity finance by the appellant – Airtours Holidays Transport Limited v Commissioner for HM Revenue and Customs [2014] EWCA Civ 1033 considered – whether the appellant established that it was the recipient of the services – no – appeal dismissed

[2015] UKFTT 91 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 28 December 2021; Ref: scu.544570

Asquith v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 26 Feb 2015

FTTTx VAT — liability to register – ticket sales – whether acting as principal or agent for VAT purposes – ticket costs as disbursement – HMRC guidelines – common law indicia – HELD – Acting as principal-full value of supplies made included as taxable supplies – indicia not of equal weight – lack of evidence that not profiting as agent-lack of documentation-disbursement rules not applicable- appeal dismissed.

[2015] UKFTT 114 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 28 December 2021; Ref: scu.544566

Taylor and Another (T/A Riverside Sports and Leisure) v Revenue and Customs: VDT 28 Nov 2005

Value added tax – exempt supplies – finance – whether part of the additional cost of monthly paid membership fees for a sports club, as compared with the cost of annually paid membership fees, was an exempt supply of finance – whether membership was annual membership with fees paid monthly or monthly membership

[2005] UKVAT V19354
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 28 December 2021; Ref: scu.238068

Quinton and Another v Revenue and Customs: VDT 14 Jun 2005

EVASION PENALTY – penalty apportioned to company director and managing officer – failure to submit returns in four periods – payment of centrally issued assessments for first three of those periods – Appellants’ belief that their financial consultant was dealing with VAT affairs – appeal allowed in respect of two periods and dismissed in respect of two periods

[2005] UKVAT V19117
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 28 December 2021; Ref: scu.229592

Surgicare – Unidades de Saude SA v Fazenda Publica: ECJ 12 Feb 2015

ECJ Judgment – Reference for a preliminary ruling – VAT – Directive 2006/112/EC – Deduction of input tax – Transactions constituting an abusive practice – National tax law – Special national procedure where the existence of abusive practices is suspected in the field of taxation – Principles of effectiveness and equivalence

C-662/13, [2015] EUECJ C-662/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:89
Bailii
Directive 2006/112/EC

European, VAT

Updated: 28 December 2021; Ref: scu.543268

Repro-Fm Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 4 Feb 2015

FTTTx VAT – Requirement of security for VAT – HMRC took account of VAT debt arising from assessment on connected company – significance of HMRC not considering reasons for withdrawal of appeal against VAT assessment for previous connected company – HMRC’s decision not unreasonable – appeal dismissed

[2015] UKFTT 63 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 28 December 2021; Ref: scu.543224

Taylor Wimpey Plc v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 12 Feb 2015

FTTTx VAT – taxpayer’s supplies effectively exempt under UK law – taxpayer seeking to rely on its directly effective right to treat supplies as standard rated – output tax exceeding input tax – whether HMRC entitled to deny input tax claim – meaning of direct effect – taxpayer’s right is only to net amount – appeal dismissed

[2015] UKFTT 74 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 28 December 2021; Ref: scu.543228

North Berwick Golf Club v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 19 Feb 2015

FTTTx VAT – protective Fleming claims pending outcome of Bridport – late appeal – strike out application – Data Select – City of Aberdeen – lengthy delay but reasonable excuse and prompt expedition when discovered – extension of time granted – strike-out application refused

[2015] UKFTT 82 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 28 December 2021; Ref: scu.543220

Perenco Holdings v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 4 Feb 2015

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – input tax – ‘Fleming claim’ – whether input tax previously claimed in respect of services supplied in connection with share issues – documents no longer in existence – jurisdiction of the Tribunal -burden of proof :legal and evidential – appeal allowed in part – issues relating to quantum and jurisdiction adjourned

[2015] UKFTT 65 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 28 December 2021; Ref: scu.543222

Gold UK Consulting Ltd and Another v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 30 Jan 2015

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – input tax – denials of right to deduct on grounds that the Appellants knew or should have known that the transactions were part of fraud by others – alleged MTIC – whether shown that the Appellant’s transactions connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT – yes – whether Appellant knew or should have known of fraud – yes – valid refusals of right to deduct – appeals dismissed

[2015] UKFTT 47 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 28 December 2021; Ref: scu.543199

Kumon Educational UK Company Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 17 Feb 2015

FTTTx VAT – franchise of educational teaching method- rewards paid to franchisee instructors – whether contingent discount reducing VAT on franchise fee – whether payment for separate supply – HELD – reward enhancement of basic supply – artificial to separate from services supplied under franchise agreement – reward is contingent discount – appeal allowed.

Rachel Short TJ
[2015] UKFTT 84 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 28 December 2021; Ref: scu.543218