Click the case name for better results:

Westland Horticulture Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Procedure : Value Added Tax): FTTTx 25 Jul 2019

VALUE ADDED TAX – Value Added Tax Act 1994, section 30(2) and Group 1 of Schedule 8 – zero-rating – whether a lawn repair product is seed for growing grass for animal feed – no – the product is standard-rated – appeal dismissed Citations: [2019] UKFTT 480 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales VAT … Continue reading Westland Horticulture Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Procedure : Value Added Tax): FTTTx 25 Jul 2019

Regina v Dealy: CACD 13 Dec 1994

Evasion of VAT does not require proof of intent to permanently deprive, ‘evasion’ can consist in a deferment, rather than permanent evasion, of a liability. Citations: Times 13-Dec-1994, [1995] STC 217 Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1983 39(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Zen Internet Ltd v Customs and Excise VDT 5-Apr-2004 … Continue reading Regina v Dealy: CACD 13 Dec 1994

Computational Structural Mechanics Ltd v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Input Tax : Other): FTTTx 8 Mar 2019

VALUE ADDED TAX – Input Tax – invoice from an associated business to another business – same owner and sole director – whether a supply and a continuous supply – yes- amounts incurred in connection with a residential property – whether de minimus reclaim allowable – yes. Value Added Tax Act 1994, sections 24, 25, … Continue reading Computational Structural Mechanics Ltd v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Input Tax : Other): FTTTx 8 Mar 2019

Totel Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v The First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) and Others: Admn 24 Mar 2011

The claimant sought to appeal against refusal of relief from payment of sums assessed by way of penalty, on the basis of hardship. HMRC argued that the right of appeal underthe 2007 Act had been taken away by the 1994 Act. Judges: Simon J Citations: [2012] QB 358, [2011] BVC 211, [2012] 2 WLR 435, … Continue reading Totel Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v The First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) and Others: Admn 24 Mar 2011

The British Association of Leisure Parks, Piers and Attractions Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 12 Oct 2011

FTTTx EXEMPTION – Trade Association – Primary purpose – Whether association’s primary purpose was making representations to the government on legislation and other public matters – No – Whether association restricted membership wholly or mainly to members whose business interests were directly connected with the purposes of the association – No – VATA 1994 Schedule … Continue reading The British Association of Leisure Parks, Piers and Attractions Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 12 Oct 2011

Prebble v Television New Zealand Ltd: PC 27 Jun 1994

(New Zealand) The plaintiff, an MP, pursued a defamation case. The defendant wished to argue for the truth of what was said, and sought to base his argument on things said in Parliament. The plaintiff responded that this would be a breach of Parliamentary privilege. Held: A Defendant may not use libel proceedings to impugn … Continue reading Prebble v Television New Zealand Ltd: PC 27 Jun 1994

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts

Banbury Visionplus Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 9 May 2006

Appeal against termination of special exemption method. Held: The taxpayer’s appeal was dismissed. The VAT tribunal’s jurisdiction was unlimited. No limitation was implied by the wording of the section. The tribunal’s discretion had only to be exercised so as to achieve the statutory objective, There was nothing to exclude the jurisdiction of the tribunal to … Continue reading Banbury Visionplus Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 9 May 2006

Georgiou and Another v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: QBD 19 Oct 1995

The VAT tribunal may assess whether the Commissioner had acted on the basis of his best judgment. Evans LJ discussed appeals on fact disguised as appeals on law: ‘There is a well-recognised need for caution in permitting challenges to findings of fact on the ground that they raise this kind of question of law. That … Continue reading Georgiou and Another v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: QBD 19 Oct 1995

Iqbal v Revenue and Customs (Procedure): FTTTx 13 May 2015

FTTTx PROCEDURE – Rule 8(2) – Application to strike out Notice of Appeal on mandatory basis – Value Added Tax Act 1994 section 83 – Whether a certain letter constituted an appealable matter – No – Whether Tribunal had jurisdiction in relation to the proceedings- No – Whether Notice of Appeal should be struck out … Continue reading Iqbal v Revenue and Customs (Procedure): FTTTx 13 May 2015

Mackenzie Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Procedure : Application for Permission To Notify Appeal Out of Time): FTTTx 6 Dec 2019

PROCEDURE – application for permission to notify appeal out of time – section 83G of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 – Martland applied – principle of legal certainty -application refused Citations: [2019] UKFTT 739 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales VAT Updated: 24 November 2022; Ref: scu.646932

Cross (T/A Euromarques) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 7 Mar 2013

Application by Respondents to have the Appellant’s appeal struck out in accordance with rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal Tax Chamber) Rules 2009.The Respondents say that the Application is made since the matter concerned is not an appealable matter under Section 83 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (‘VATA’) and as such … Continue reading Cross (T/A Euromarques) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 7 Mar 2013

Data Select v HM Revenue and Customs: UTTC 1 Jun 2012

UTLC VALUE ADDED TAX – application to First-tier Tribunal for extension of time to appeal under section 83G(1) and (6) of Value Added Tax Act 1994 – legal test to be applied to application for extension of time – First-tier Tribunal applied correct legal test – decision not perverse – no error of law – … Continue reading Data Select v HM Revenue and Customs: UTTC 1 Jun 2012

Yeabsley Financial Solutions Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 29 May 2012

FTTTx Value Added Tax – Flat Rate Scheme – Trader seeking to withdraw retrospectively – permission refused by Respondents – Whether refusal ‘reasonable’ – Sections 83-84 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – Reg. 55 of VAT Regs. 1995 – Appeal dismissed Citations: [2012] UKFTT 358 (TC) Links: Bailii VAT Updated: 03 November 2022; Ref: scu.462773

Florida Foods Ltd (T/A Subway) v Revenue and Customs (Procedure : Whether Valid Appeal Made To The Tribunal): FTTTx 25 Jul 2019

PROCEDURE – whether valid appeal made to the Tribunal – ss 83C, 83F and 83G Value Added Tax Act 1994 – yes – whether to reinstate proceedings following earlier strike-out under rule 8(1) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 – no Citations: [2019] UKFTT 477 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and … Continue reading Florida Foods Ltd (T/A Subway) v Revenue and Customs (Procedure : Whether Valid Appeal Made To The Tribunal): FTTTx 25 Jul 2019

Bourne v The Commissioner for Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 1 Jul 2010

VALUE ADDED TAX -‘DIY Builders’ Scheme’ – claim for relief under s 35 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – whether works carried out in the course or furtherance of any business – appeal dismissed. LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION – Appellant claimed to have been misled by HMRC guidance – whether jurisdiction under s 83 Value Added Tax … Continue reading Bourne v The Commissioner for Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 1 Jul 2010

Gray (T/A William Gray and Sons) v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ChD 7 Nov 2000

The trader carried on business as a builder both through a limited company and on his own account. He tried to apportion the businesses so that neither was registerable for VAT. In one period he exceeded the limit. He asked the commissioners to exercise their discretion not to register him retrospectively acknowledging that his turnover … Continue reading Gray (T/A William Gray and Sons) v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ChD 7 Nov 2000

Total Network Sl v Customs and Excise Commissioners: CA 31 Jan 2007

The defendants suspected a carousel VAT fraud. The defendants appealed a finding that there was a viable cause of action alleging a ‘conspiracy where the unlawful means alleged is a common law offence of cheating the public revenue’. The defendants argued (inter alia) that the attempted recovery was void under the Billl of Rights. Held: … Continue reading Total Network Sl v Customs and Excise Commissioners: CA 31 Jan 2007

Bennett v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (No 2): ChD 27 Feb 2001

There was nothing to prevent the Commissioners withdrawing one assessment and replacing it with another even after an adjudication on the first by a tribunal, but they could not do this in such a way as to attempt to relitigate the issues determined. Citations: Gazette 29-Mar-2001, Times 27-Feb-2001 Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994 73, … Continue reading Bennett v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (No 2): ChD 27 Feb 2001

Willis Pension Trustees Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 25 Jul 2005

VDT Supply for a consideration – whether foreign exchange transactions always constitute such supplies by both parties – whether a counterparty’s profit from foreign exchange transactions is consideration for its supply – Value Added Tax Act 1994 section 5(2) – Sixth Directive Articles 2 and 11. Interpretation of the operative part of a preliminary ruling … Continue reading Willis Pension Trustees Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 25 Jul 2005

Zen Internet Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 5 Apr 2004

VDT VALUE ADDED TAX – dishonest evasion – VATA s 60 – appellant paying six successive centrally-issued assessments for less than the true liability – inadequate attempts to put accounting records in order – whether ‘dishonest’ – yes – appeal dismissed but reduction for mitigation increased Judges: Colin Bishopp C Citations: [2004] UKVAT V18563 Links: … Continue reading Zen Internet Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 5 Apr 2004

Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Zielinski Baker and Partners Limited: HL 26 Feb 2004

The commissioners sought to charge to VAT charges for works which had been carried out to a building within the curtilage of a listed building. The taxpayer sought zero-rating. Held: The outbuilding to which alterations were made must have been a ‘protected building’. Note (1) defines a protected building as both ‘a building which is … Continue reading Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Zielinski Baker and Partners Limited: HL 26 Feb 2004

Eastbourne Town Radio Cars Association v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: HL 4 Apr 2001

The unincorporated association employed staff to provide services to its members. The cost was paid from subscriptions. Held: The provision of these services was chargeable to VAT, and the subscriptions were accordingly liable to VAT. Provisions within the constitution that such services were supplied by the association as agent for the members, were insufficient to … Continue reading Eastbourne Town Radio Cars Association v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: HL 4 Apr 2001

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Sinclair Collis Limited: HL 7 Jun 2001

The appellants operated a system of placing their vending machines in clubs for the sale of cigarettes. They took as consideration a share of the profits of the cigarettes sold, and, in return, maintained the machines. They claimed that the machines were not placed pursuant to a licence to occupy land, a licence of immovable … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Sinclair Collis Limited: HL 7 Jun 2001

Romasave (Property Services) Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 3 Jun 2014

FTTTx VAT – Application for permission to appeal out of time – Value Added Tax Act 1994, s. 83G(1) and (6) – Application allowed in part Citations: [2014] UKFTT 549 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Romasave Property Services Ltd v Revenue and Customs FTTTx 26-Apr-2013 FTTTx VAT – application … Continue reading Romasave (Property Services) Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 3 Jun 2014

Romasave Property Services Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 26 Apr 2013

FTTTx VAT – application for permission to make late appeal – permission refused Citations: [2013] UKFTT 267 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See Also – Romasave (Property Services) Ltd v Revenue and Customs FTTTx 3-Jun-2014 FTTTx VAT – Application for permission to appeal out of time – Value Added Tax Act … Continue reading Romasave Property Services Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 26 Apr 2013

Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: QBD 27 Feb 1995

VAT applied to ‘deemed’ supplies even though these had been made through an intermediate finance company. On a simultaneous supply to an agent and a principal, agent’s tax to be in same period. Citations: Times 27-Feb-1995, Ind Summary 10-Apr-1995 Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994 47(3) Jurisdiction: England and Wales VAT Updated: 10 April 2022; … Continue reading Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: QBD 27 Feb 1995

Marks and Spencer Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: QBD 19 Jan 1999

Reclaims of overpaid VAT are governed by our domestic legislation, and not by European VAT law. Zero-rate is not a tax set under European law. Limitations on reclaims are therefore properly set by our national legislation. Unjust enrichment explored. Citations: Times 19-Jan-1999 Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994 80 Jurisdiction: England and Wales VAT, European … Continue reading Marks and Spencer Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: QBD 19 Jan 1999

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Westmorland Motorway Services Ltd: CA 5 Feb 1998

Westmorland ran motorway service stations. Its practice, known to coach drivers, was to provide, without payment, a packet of cigarettes and a self-service meal (chosen from its usual menu) to any coach driver who brought a coach with at least twenty passengers and stopped for at least thirty minutes. The issue was to quantify the … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Westmorland Motorway Services Ltd: CA 5 Feb 1998

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Leightons Ltd; Same v Eye-Tech Opticians: QBD 13 Apr 1995

Opticians supply of glasses and of eye tests are separate of goods and services. The dispensing and fitting of spectacles was a separate service from supply of spectacles. Citations: Times 13-Apr-1995, Ind Summary 30-May-1995 Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1983 40(1), Value Added Tax Act 1994 Sch 9 grp7 item 1 Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Leightons Ltd; Same v Eye-Tech Opticians: QBD 13 Apr 1995

B J Rice and Associates (A Firm) v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 14 Feb 1996

Liability for VAT was determined at date of supply of services not date of bill. Citations: Times 14-Feb-1996, [1996] STC 581 Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1983 4 5 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Appeal from – B J Rice and Associates v Customs and Excise Commissioners QBD 18-Apr-1994 Time of supply on continuous service … Continue reading B J Rice and Associates (A Firm) v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 14 Feb 1996

Lockheed Martin UK Limited v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Zero Rating – Modification or Conversion of Aircraft): FTTTx 7 Dec 2021

VAT – zero rating – modification or conversion of aircraft – supply of airborne surveillance and control system – additional role for existing aircraft – use of role-fit kits – whether modification or conversion – jurisdiction of Tribunal to reach decision on basis other than one put forward by parties – unusual importance of burden … Continue reading Lockheed Martin UK Limited v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Zero Rating – Modification or Conversion of Aircraft): FTTTx 7 Dec 2021

Mathieson v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: OHCS 17 Jun 1999

A taxpayer acting upon misleading advice from a customs official which led to an overpayment of VAT, the taxpayer was entitled to the repayment together with interest on the overpaid sum. That advice was incomplete rather than erroneous as such did not decide the issue. Citations: Times 17-Jun-1999 Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994 78(1)(a) … Continue reading Mathieson v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: OHCS 17 Jun 1999

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Anglo German Breweries Limited: ChD 29 Nov 2002

The respondents appealed against imposition of assessments for the diversion of alcohol products from bonded warehouses without payment of duties. Pretence had been made of deliveries abroad, but the goods were later diverted. The company was insolvent even without the impositions, but sought to delay the winding up to resolve its appeal against the impositions. … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Anglo German Breweries Limited: ChD 29 Nov 2002

Hopkins v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 19 Apr 2012

Value Added Tax Act 1994 (VATA), Schedule 8, Group 5, Note 2. Refund to persons constructing certain dwellings – residential conversion – separate use or disposal of the dwelling was prohibited by the terms of the statutory planning consent at the time the conversion was designed – thus works were not eligible. Appeal dismissed. [2012] … Continue reading Hopkins v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 19 Apr 2012

Zorkova v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 14 Feb 2014

FTTTX PROCEDURE – application to strike out appeal against a refusal to restore a vehicle – appeal out of time – test in Data Select applied – application granted and proceedings struck out Peter Kempster J [2014] UKFTT 196 (TC) Bailii England and Wales Citing: Cited – Dominic O’Flaherty v HMRC UTTC 4-Apr-2013 UTTC Procedure … Continue reading Zorkova v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 14 Feb 2014

Data Select v HM Revenue and Customs; UTTC 1 Jun 2012

References: [2012] UKUT 187 (TCC) Links: Bailii Ratio: UTLC VALUE ADDED TAX – application to First-tier Tribunal for extension of time to appeal under section 83G(1) and (6) of Value Added Tax Act 1994 – legal test to be applied to application for extension of time – First-tier Tribunal applied correct legal test – decision … Continue reading Data Select v HM Revenue and Customs; UTTC 1 Jun 2012

Lex Services plc v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Customs and Excise: HL 4 Dec 2003

References: [2003] UKHL 67, Gazette 22-Jan-2004, [2004] STC 73 Links: House of Lords, Bailii Coram: Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Steyn, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Millett, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe When taking a car in part exchange, the company would initially offer the correct market value. If the customer wanted, the company would agree a higher … Continue reading Lex Services plc v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Customs and Excise: HL 4 Dec 2003

law index

Our law-index is a substantial selection from our database. Cases here are restricted in number by date and lack the additional facilities formerly available within lawindexpro. Please do enjoy this free version of the lawindex. Case law does not ‘belong’ to lawyers. Judgments are made up of words which can be read and understood (if … Continue reading law index