Briggs v Briggs and Others: CoP 24 Nov 2016

References: [2016] EWCOP 48, [2016] WLR(D) 634
Links: Bailii, WLRD
Coram: Charles J
Ratio: The Court considered whether the disagreement about whether it was in the best interests of Mr B for him to be given clinically assisted nutrition and hydration, was one which could be determined
Statutes: Mental Capacity Act 2005
Jurisdiction: England and Wales

Last Update: 03-Feb-17
Ref: 572012