EAT RACE DISCRIMINATION – Burden of proof
The Employment Tribunal did not apply section 54A(2) of the Race Relations Act 1976. The facts upon which the Claimant relied, taken as a whole were such that the Tribunal could conclude in the absence of an adequate explanation that the Respondent refused or deliberately omitted to offer him employment on racial grounds. The Tribunal, however, failed to make findings on some matters of primary fact and failed to consider whether those facts which the Claimant established brought his case within section 54A(2).
Judges:
Richardson J
Citations:
[2011] UKEAT 0310 – 10 – 1805
Links:
Statutes:
Race Relations Act 1976 54A(2)
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal from – Country Style Foods Ltd v Bouzir CA 8-Dec-2011
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment, Discrimination
Updated: 15 September 2022; Ref: scu.441348