Atorney-General v Yule and Mercantile Bank of India: 1931

The court considered the shifting burden of proof when the question arose of an intention to change a domicile of origin.

Citations:

(1931) 145 LT 9

Cited by:

CitedAgulian and Another v Cyganik CA 24-Feb-2006
The question was whether the deceased had lost his domicile of birth and acquired one of choice when living and working in the UK for 43 years. He had retained land in Cyprus, but lived here.
Held: He had retained his domicile of birth: . .
CitedHolliday and Another v Musa and Others CA 30-Mar-2010
The adult children of the deceased appealed against a finding that their father had died domiciled in the UK, and allowing an application under the 1975 Act. He had a domicile of origin in Cyprus but had lived in England since 1958. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Family

Updated: 14 May 2022; Ref: scu.238725