ACCG and Another v MN and Others: CoP 20 Nov 2013

Application for order under the 2005 Act restricting contact between the young adult child with disabilities and his family. Eleanor King J described his condition saying he had: ‘severe learning and physical disabilities together with autism and an uncommon epileptic condition resulting in frequent seizures and risk of sudden death. A nurse has to be available at all times to administer emergency drugs to MN if the need arises. MN had poor muscle tone and uses a wheelchair. He is doubly incontinent. MN has the cognitive ability of a child aged less than 1 year. He has no speech but can express his feelings by facial expression, sounds and gestures. MN needs help with feeding as he is vulnerable to choking; he requires 2:1 care with his personal care and accessing the community. Overall MN has to have his carers nearby at all times and during the night MN has one sleeping member of staff and one member of staff who stays awake to look after him.’
Held: ‘If MN had capacity, but required the type of nursing care he currently needs due only to his physical needs, he might wish his mother to assist with his personal care. The care providers . . may, as here, be unwilling to allow this for whatever reason; perhaps health and safety issues or difficult relationships with MN’s mother. MN with capacity would have the following options: (i) accept the conditions of residence at the care provider’s establishment, (ii) privately fund his care elsewhere, or (iii) seek to negotiate with the ACCG in the hope of them agreeing to fund his removal to a different residential unit which would allow his mother to assist with his personal care. What MN with capacity would not be able to do is to force, by way of court order or otherwise, the care providers . . to agree to his mother coming into their facility and ‘assisting’ with his intimate care.’

Judges:

Eleanor King DBE J

Citations:

[2013] EWHC 3859 (COP), [2013] EWCOP 3859

Links:

Bailii, Bailii

Statutes:

Mental Capacity Act 2005 16(2)(a)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

At CoPACCG and Another v MN CA 25-Jun-2014
Two renewed applications for permission to appeal from a judgment of the CoP regarding provision of support for home visits for a young adult with severe health difficulties and the scope of the power of the CoP to make provisions. . .
At CoPRe MN (Adult) CA 7-May-2015
The parties disputed the care of MN, a young adult without capacity.
Held: Munby P gave four reasons why the Court of Protection should not embark on the kind of process for which the parents contended: first, it is not its proper function to . .
At CoPN v ACCG and Others SC 22-Mar-2017
The local authority and a young man’s parents disputed his continued care, he having substantial incapacities. The parents wanted assistance caring for him on visits home. The LA declined to fund that support. The LA now argued that the CoP had not . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Health, Education

Updated: 25 July 2022; Ref: scu.518977