Re MN (Adult): CA 7 May 2015

The parties disputed the care of MN, a young adult without capacity.
Held: Munby P gave four reasons why the Court of Protection should not embark on the kind of process for which the parents contended: first, it is not its proper function to embark upon a factual inquiry into some abstract issue the answer to which cannot affect the outcome of the proceedings before it; second, it should not embark upon such an enquiry in order to provide a platform or springboard for possible future proceedings in the administrative court; third, such an exercise runs the risk of confusing the different perspectives and principles governing the exercise by the Court of Protection of its functions and the exercise by a public authority of its functions; and fourth, it would risk exposing the public authority to impermissible pressure.
Sir James Munby P pointed out that ‘the still inveterate use of orders in the form of declaratory relief might be thought to be in significant part both anachronistic and inappropriate’

Judges:

Sir James Munby P FD, Treacy, Gloster LJJ

Citations:

[2015] EWCA Civ 411, [2015] COPLR 505, [2016] Fam 87, [2015] Med LR 287, [2015] 3 WLR 1585, [2015] WLR(D) 208, (2015) 18 CCL Rep 521

Links:

Bailii, WLRD

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

At CoPACCG and Another v MN and Others CoP 20-Nov-2013
Application for order under the 2005 Act restricting contact between the young adult child with disabilities and his family. Eleanor King J described his condition saying he had: ‘severe learning and physical disabilities together with autism and an . .
CitedA v Liverpool City Council HL 1981
Though the child was subject to a care order in favour of the local authority, a wardship order was sought.
Held: Once a care order had been made, whether final or interim, the court was effectively faced with a choice and not a choice which . .
LeaveACCG and Another v MN CA 25-Jun-2014
Two renewed applications for permission to appeal from a judgment of the CoP regarding provision of support for home visits for a young adult with severe health difficulties and the scope of the power of the CoP to make provisions. . .

Cited by:

CitedN v ACCG and Others SC 22-Mar-2017
The local authority and a young man’s parents disputed his continued care, he having substantial incapacities. The parents wanted assistance caring for him on visits home. The LA declined to fund that support. The LA now argued that the CoP had not . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Health, Litigation Practice

Updated: 25 July 2022; Ref: scu.546455