Click the case name for better results:

Dunbar v Revenue and Customs (Value Added Tax – DIY House Builders Scheme): FTTTx 13 Dec 2019

VALUE ADDED TAX – DIY House Builders Scheme – s 35 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – Regulation 201 Value Added Tax Regulations 1995 – date of the completion of the building – whether claim made within the relevant time limit – appeal allowed Citations: [2019] UKFTT 747 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading Dunbar v Revenue and Customs (Value Added Tax – DIY House Builders Scheme): FTTTx 13 Dec 2019

Franks and Franks v Revenue and Customs (Value Added Tax – Diy Builders): FTTTx 11 Feb 2020

VALUE ADDED TAX – DIY builders – claim under Section 35 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 to recover VAT on goods and services supplied in relation to the construction of a dwelling where the revised planning permission referring to the new dwelling was granted after some of the goods and services were supplied … Continue reading Franks and Franks v Revenue and Customs (Value Added Tax – Diy Builders): FTTTx 11 Feb 2020

Luke v Revenue and Customs (Procedure : Value Added Tax – Zero Rating – Recovery of Tax): FTTTx 31 Jul 2019

Value Added Tax – zero rating – recovery of tax – taxpayer granted planning permission for construction of new dwelling and detached garaging – first floor of garage includes sitting/dining area with kitchen units, two bedrooms and bathroom – planning permission has condition that accommodation on first floor of garage shall be brought into ancillary … Continue reading Luke v Revenue and Customs (Procedure : Value Added Tax – Zero Rating – Recovery of Tax): FTTTx 31 Jul 2019

Computational Structural Mechanics Ltd v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Input Tax : Other): FTTTx 8 Mar 2019

VALUE ADDED TAX – Input Tax – invoice from an associated business to another business – same owner and sole director – whether a supply and a continuous supply – yes- amounts incurred in connection with a residential property – whether de minimus reclaim allowable – yes. Value Added Tax Act 1994, sections 24, 25, … Continue reading Computational Structural Mechanics Ltd v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Input Tax : Other): FTTTx 8 Mar 2019

Totel Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v The First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) and Others: Admn 24 Mar 2011

The claimant sought to appeal against refusal of relief from payment of sums assessed by way of penalty, on the basis of hardship. HMRC argued that the right of appeal underthe 2007 Act had been taken away by the 1994 Act. Judges: Simon J Citations: [2012] QB 358, [2011] BVC 211, [2012] 2 WLR 435, … Continue reading Totel Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v The First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) and Others: Admn 24 Mar 2011

Snow Factor Ltd v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 8 Mar 2019

Value Added Tax – Application Under Section 85B of Vata 1994 Citations: [2019] UKUT 77 (TCC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Appeal from – Snow Factor Ltd v Revenue and Customs FTTTx 24-Jan-2018 Vat – Reduced Rates : Other . . Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete. VAT Updated: … Continue reading Snow Factor Ltd v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 8 Mar 2019

Regency Factors Plc v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 13 Nov 2020

VALUE ADDED TAX – bad debt relief – s 36 VATA 1994, reg 168 VAT Regulations 1995, Articles 73 and 90 Principal VAT Directive – factoring services – when is the consideration received – requirement in reg 168 for a ‘refunds for bad debts account’ Citations: [2020] UKUT 357 (TCC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and … Continue reading Regency Factors Plc v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 13 Nov 2020

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Blom-Cooper: CA 4 Apr 2003

The taxpayer appealed a decision that a conversion of a non-residential part of a building used for business and residential purposes was not exempt from VAT. Held: The building was not within the definition of a self contained residential building. If separate parts could be buildings, no part would satisfy the definition of a building … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Blom-Cooper: CA 4 Apr 2003

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Blom-Cooper: ChD 12 Jul 2002

The tax payer had converted a building which had had both residential and business uses into residential use, and sought to reclaim the input tax on that part of the expenditure attributable to the residential part. The Commissioners appealed. Held: The tribunal was correct. There was no need to restrict the availability to wholly residential … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Blom-Cooper: ChD 12 Jul 2002

Coates v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 16 Sep 2015

FTTTx VAT – DIY Builders Scheme – Section 35 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – Inaccurate claim – Administrative error by Appellant’s representatives – Incorrectly completed form sent by his accountants to the Appellant for signature – Adjustments made by HMRC – Penalty applied – Schedule 24 Finance Act 2007 – Whether the appellant took … Continue reading Coates v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 16 Sep 2015

McBraida Plc v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Zero-Rating : Transport): FTTTx 22 Jan 2019

VALUE ADDED TAX – zero-rating under paragraph 2A of Group 8 to Schedule 8 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 for supplies of aircraft engine parts – whether the Appellant has sufficient evidence to establish that the conditions for zero-rating under that provision have been met – yes, in relation to some of the … Continue reading McBraida Plc v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Zero-Rating : Transport): FTTTx 22 Jan 2019

Long and Another v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 28 Jan 2021

VALUE ADDED TAX – DIY Housebuilders’ Scheme – Retrospective Planning Permission obtained after claim for VAT refund submitted -whether work lawful – whether building designed as a dwelling – whether claim valid – Section 35 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – Note 2 of Group 5 in Schedule 8 to Value Added Tax Act 1994 … Continue reading Long and Another v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 28 Jan 2021

Westinsure Group Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 11 Feb 2013

FTTTx VAT – exemption for provision of services of an insurance intermediary – whether exemption applies to services provided to facilitate insurance brokers obtaining better terms and related benefits from insurance companies and other insurance related services – Article 135 (1)(a) Directive 2006/112 EC- Schedule 4 Group 2 Value Added Tax Act 1994 Citations: [2013] … Continue reading Westinsure Group Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 11 Feb 2013

De Ferranti v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 30 Jun 2011

Value Added Tax; economic activities; business; sale of venison; postal services; whether sale of wild venison from large remote highland estate constitutes an economic activity; whether contract with Royal Mail for delivery of mail to remote location constitutes an economic activity. Value Added Tax Act 1994 ss 1, 2, 4 and 94 EC Council Directive … Continue reading De Ferranti v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 30 Jun 2011

Wedgbury and Stephen Wedgbury v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Refunds for DIY Housebuilders): FTTTx 2 Mar 2020

VAT – refunds for DIY housebuilders – Value Added Tax Act 1994, section 35 – Value Added Tax Regulations 1995, regulations 200 and 201 – whether or not the claims were made no later than three months after the completion of the buildings – yes – appeals allowed’ Citations: [2020] UKFTT 125 (TC) Links: Bailii … Continue reading Wedgbury and Stephen Wedgbury v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Refunds for DIY Housebuilders): FTTTx 2 Mar 2020

Proffitt v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Builders : Do -It-Yourself): FTTTx 28 Feb 2020

VALUE ADDED TAX – DIY House Builders scheme – Section 35 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – Regulation 201 Value Added Tax Regulations 1995 – date of completion of the building – divergent lines of authority – Fraser preferred – whether claim made in time in circumstances of case – yes – appeal allowed Citations: … Continue reading Proffitt v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Builders : Do -It-Yourself): FTTTx 28 Feb 2020

Yeabsley Financial Solutions Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 29 May 2012

FTTTx Value Added Tax – Flat Rate Scheme – Trader seeking to withdraw retrospectively – permission refused by Respondents – Whether refusal ‘reasonable’ – Sections 83-84 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – Reg. 55 of VAT Regs. 1995 – Appeal dismissed Citations: [2012] UKFTT 358 (TC) Links: Bailii VAT Updated: 03 November 2022; Ref: scu.462773

Baig (T/A Zara Trading Company) v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Appeals : Entertainment of Appeal): FTTTx 19 Feb 2019

Procedure – application to reinstate appeal out of time – Rule 17 FTT Rules- whether application precluded by section 85(4)Value Added Tax Act 1994 – yes – whether if not so precluded appeal should be reinstated – no Citations: [2019] UKFTT 127 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales VAT Updated: 25 October 2022; Ref: … Continue reading Baig (T/A Zara Trading Company) v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Appeals : Entertainment of Appeal): FTTTx 19 Feb 2019

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Institute of Directors, BAA Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 11 Dec 2002

The court examined arrangements whereby organisations which were not banks, endorsed credit cards to be issued by banks to their members. Held: The granting of credit was exempt from VAT, and also were exempted negotiations of credit and the provision of intermediary services. It was wrong to seek to characterise the arrangement as the mere … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Institute of Directors, BAA Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 11 Dec 2002

Bourne v The Commissioner for Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 1 Jul 2010

VALUE ADDED TAX -‘DIY Builders’ Scheme’ – claim for relief under s 35 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – whether works carried out in the course or furtherance of any business – appeal dismissed. LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION – Appellant claimed to have been misled by HMRC guidance – whether jurisdiction under s 83 Value Added Tax … Continue reading Bourne v The Commissioner for Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 1 Jul 2010

Littlewoods Retail Ltd and Others v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 19 May 2010

The claimants had overpaid large sums of VAT over several years, and been, eventually, refunded, with simple interest. The claimants now said that the interest should have been compounded. The revenue contended that such a claim was excluded under European law. Held: As a matter of statutory construction, the claims were excluded by sections 78 … Continue reading Littlewoods Retail Ltd and Others v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 19 May 2010

Midlands Co-Operative Society Ltd v the Commissioners of HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 19 Jun 2007

The taxpayer had made a trasnfer of engagements. There was due to it a sum for overpayment of VAT. The revenue said that the claim could not be transferred. Held: the taxpayer’s appeal succeeded. Nothing in the statutory code operated to make such a transfer impossible. Judges: Blackburne J Citations: [2007] EWHC 1432 (Ch), Times … Continue reading Midlands Co-Operative Society Ltd v the Commissioners of HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 19 Jun 2007

Revenue and Customs v Netbusters (UK) Limited: UTTc 5 Jul 2022

VAT – classification of single composite supply – objective character or economic reality – supply of pitch hire, a licence to occupy football and netball pitches or the supply of competitive 5 or 7-a-side league matches – grant of any interest in or right over land or of any licence to occupy land for the … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v Netbusters (UK) Limited: UTTc 5 Jul 2022

The Sheiling Trust (Ringwood Waldorf School) v Revenue and Customs: VDT 27 Feb 2006

Value added tax – relevant charitable purpose– use of a building by a charity — whether the use of the building by a school was otherwise than in the course or furtherance of a building – whether the activity carried on by the school comprised a business for VAT purposes – no – whether charity … Continue reading The Sheiling Trust (Ringwood Waldorf School) v Revenue and Customs: VDT 27 Feb 2006

Revenue and Customs v Iveco Ltd: UTTC 13 Jun 2016

UTTC VALUE ADDED TAX – whether section 80 VAT Act 1994 applies to claim to enforce directly effective right under article 11C(1) Sixth Directive to reduce taxable amounts to reflect rebates paid in periods before it was implemented in UK legislation – if so, whether claim made within time limit in section 80(4) – whether … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v Iveco Ltd: UTTC 13 Jun 2016

Grand Entertainments Company v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 3 May 2016

UTTC Claims for repayment of VAT – whether further claims for refunds were amendments to an earlier claim made within the time prescribed by s. 121 Finance Act 2008, or were separate claims out of time and barred by s. 80(4) Value Added Tax Act 1994 – held that the claims were separate claims and … Continue reading Grand Entertainments Company v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 3 May 2016

Cable and Wireless Plc v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 27 Mar 2009

FTTTx Value Added Tax – Whether the Appellant’s late claim for input tax, initially deducted in its Return, but later recovered by HMRC under an assessment, is a claim for input tax under Regulation 29 (1) of the 1995 VAT Regulations or a claim under section 80(1B) of the VAT Act 1994 for the recovery … Continue reading Cable and Wireless Plc v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 27 Mar 2009

Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: HL 11 Mar 1999

Where a body regulated a profession by virtue of a statutory regime, the fees charged by that body to its members were not subject to VAT. Promoting and supervising professional standards is not an ‘economic activity’ within the meaning of the Act. Citations: Times 29-Mar-1999, Gazette 19-May-1999, [1999] UKHL 19; [1999] 2 All ER 449; … Continue reading Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: HL 11 Mar 1999

The Test Claimants In The FII Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 18 Dec 2014

The company claimants had paid large sums in excess tax under a mistake of European law. Judges: Henderson J Citations: [2014] EWHC 4302 (Ch), [2015] BTC 3, [2015] STI 49, [2015] STC 1471 Links: Bailii Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994 94 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Test Claimants In The FII … Continue reading The Test Claimants In The FII Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 18 Dec 2014

Marks and Spencer Plc v Customs and Excise: CA 14 Dec 1999

The taxpayer discovered that it had over several years made overpayments of VAT on chocolate covered biscuits because of a mistake as to the tax mutual with the defendants. Held: MandS’s challenge to section 80(4) (as infringing EU law) failed, as regards the teacakes claim, because the Becker conditions were not satisfied (Becker v Finanzamt … Continue reading Marks and Spencer Plc v Customs and Excise: CA 14 Dec 1999

Conde Nast Publications Ltd v Revenue and Customs: CA 11 Jul 2006

Time limits for reclaim of VAT. The Court considered an argument that it should treat the Court of Appeal decision in Fleming (t/a Bodycraft) v Customs and Excise Commissioners [2006] STC 864 as inconsistent with EU law. Held: Chadwick LJ said: ‘I am content to assume that there may be circumstances in which the obligation … Continue reading Conde Nast Publications Ltd v Revenue and Customs: CA 11 Jul 2006

Willis Pension Trustees Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 25 Jul 2005

VDT Supply for a consideration – whether foreign exchange transactions always constitute such supplies by both parties – whether a counterparty’s profit from foreign exchange transactions is consideration for its supply – Value Added Tax Act 1994 section 5(2) – Sixth Directive Articles 2 and 11. Interpretation of the operative part of a preliminary ruling … Continue reading Willis Pension Trustees Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 25 Jul 2005

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Barclays Bank Plc: CA 17 Oct 2001

The respondent controlled a VAT group of companies. Its shareholding in TDL was transferred to a charitable trust, and the Commissioners were informed that it was no longer a member of the group. The commissioners contended that it remained a member up to the end of the accounting period. Held: The provisions of the Act … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Barclays Bank Plc: CA 17 Oct 2001

Opal Carleton Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 29 Jul 2010

VAT – reduced rate- student accommodation – whether ‘residential accommodation for students’ liable to VAT at standard rate or ‘ changed number of dwelling conversion’ liable to VAT at reduced rate – Value Added Tax Act 1994 Schedule 7A – over-arching development student accommodation – VAT at standard Rate- appeal dismissed Citations: [2010] UKFTT 353 … Continue reading Opal Carleton Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 29 Jul 2010

The Rank Group Plc v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 1 Apr 2019

VALUE ADDED TAX – s80 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 – whether appellant made a valid claim under s80(1B) – the nature of set-off between input and output tax – ‘set-off’ provisions under s81(3) and s81(3A) Citations: [2019] UKUT 100 (TCC) Links: Bailii Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994 80 Jurisdiction: England and … Continue reading The Rank Group Plc v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 1 Apr 2019

Midlands Co-Operative Society Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 20 Jul 2005

VALUE ADDED TAX – claim for repayment of overpaid output tax – VATA 1994 s 80, VAT Regulations 1995 reg 35 – industrial and provident societies – output tax paid by one society later transferring its engagements to another – whether right to claim refund transferred – Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965, ss 16, … Continue reading Midlands Co-Operative Society Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 20 Jul 2005

Nell Gwynn House Maintenance Fund v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: HL 15 Dec 1998

Trustees who managed a group of apartments argued that they did not themselves provide staff services to the tenants, but rather arranged for the staff to provide services to them. Held: The contract providing cleaning and other services, by a maintenance fund for a block of flats, was a VATable supply by the Trustees who … Continue reading Nell Gwynn House Maintenance Fund v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: HL 15 Dec 1998

Romasave Property Services Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 26 Apr 2013

FTTTx VAT – application for permission to make late appeal – permission refused Citations: [2013] UKFTT 267 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See Also – Romasave (Property Services) Ltd v Revenue and Customs FTTTx 3-Jun-2014 FTTTx VAT – Application for permission to appeal out of time – Value Added Tax Act … Continue reading Romasave Property Services Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 26 Apr 2013

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Reed Personnel Services Ltd: QBD 13 Apr 1995

A company providing agency nurses was not itself providing nursing services and was not exempt from VAT. Where a tripartite contract was unclear on the liability for VAT, the tribunal was to look on it as a whole. It was the function of the Tribunal to hear the evidence and to ascertain from the whole … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Reed Personnel Services Ltd: QBD 13 Apr 1995

C R Smith Glaziers (Dunfermline) Limited v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: HL 20 Feb 2003

The taxpayer sold double glazing, supported by an insured guarantee, for which a charge was made. The additional charge was exempt, but it was contended that the contract should have stated the amount pursuant to Note 5. Held: The contract gave the rate of charge at 10 per cent. The Act allowed the commisioners to … Continue reading C R Smith Glaziers (Dunfermline) Limited v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: HL 20 Feb 2003

Redman v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 24 Feb 2017

(Vat – Builders : Do -It-Yourself) VALUE ADDED TAX – DIY Housebuilders Scheme – construction of new build house – whether designed as a dwelling for purposes of subsection (35)(1A)(a) and Note (2)(c) to Group 5 of Schedule 8 to VAT Act 1994 – whether Section 75 agreement amounted to a prohibition – yes – … Continue reading Redman v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 24 Feb 2017

SAE Education Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 28 Feb 2014

VAT – Exemption – Company providing educational courses to students – succession of agreements between company and university – whether supply of educational courses by company exempt – whether courses supplied by eligible body – whether company a college of a university – VATA 1994 Sch 9, Group 6, Item 1, Note (1)(b) – EC … Continue reading SAE Education Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 28 Feb 2014

Airtours Holidays Transport Ltd v Revenue and Customs: SC 11 May 2016

The court was asked whether the appellant, Airtours Holidays Transport Ltd (formerly MyTravel Group plc), was entitled to recover, by way of input tax VAT charged by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in respect of services provided by PwC and paid for by Airtours. Held: The appeal was dismissed (Clarke and Carnwath LL dissenting) For the VAT to … Continue reading Airtours Holidays Transport Ltd v Revenue and Customs: SC 11 May 2016

Howells and Another v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 10 Aug 2015

FTTTx Value Added Tax : Diy Builders Scheme – VALUE ADDED TAX D DIY Builders scheme D s 35 VATA 1994 D claim withdrawn because HMRC evidence requirements could not be met D Penalty under Schedule 24 Finance Act 2007 D whether inaccuracy in document caused by failure to take reasonable care D No, because … Continue reading Howells and Another v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 10 Aug 2015

Westinsure Group Ltd v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 13 Oct 2014

VAT – exemption for provision of services of an insurance broker or agent – whether exemption applies to services provided to facilitate insurance brokers obtaining better terms and related benefits from insurance companies and other insurance related services – Article 135.1(a) Directive 2006/112 EC – Schedule 9 Group 2 Value Added Tax Act 1994 [2014] … Continue reading Westinsure Group Ltd v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 13 Oct 2014

Kendricks Planning Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 6 Aug 2014

FTTTx EVASION – VAT civil evasion penalty – sections 60 and 61 VATA 1994 – payment of central VAT assessments over long period – assessments lower than the VAT actually due – whether Appellants knew of the discrepancy – liability of director for penalty – whether HMRC satisfied burden of proof – appeals allowed [2014] … Continue reading Kendricks Planning Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 6 Aug 2014

Oriflame UK Ltd v The Commissioners for Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 14 May 2014

VAT – Preliminary issue – Single supply made by appellant to its non-VAT registered sales consultants – Subsequent retail sale of goods sold by sales consultants – Direction that output tax on appellant’s due at ‘open market value on a sale by retail’ – Whether ‘open market value on a sale by retail’ should include … Continue reading Oriflame UK Ltd v The Commissioners for Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 14 May 2014

Crescent of Cambridge Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 1 May 2014

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – default surcharge – section 59 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – whether deferral agreements excluded default surcharges – whether default in period 05/12- whether return sent in one day late so that surcharge liability period extended – whether result disproportionate – appeal dismissed- Brannan TJ [2014] UKFTT 398 (TC) Bailii … Continue reading Crescent of Cambridge Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 1 May 2014

Karandal v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 2 Apr 2014

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – appeal against decision compulsorily to register appellant pursuant to paragraph 5 Schedule 1 to Value Added Tax Act 1994 – appeal against late notification penalty – whether appellant liable to compulsory registration – yes -whether liable to a penalty for late notification of requirement to register under section 67 Value … Continue reading Karandal v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 2 Apr 2014

Astral Construction Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 2 Jul 2013

FTTTx VAT – zero rating – building work – construction of residential care home integrating existing church – whether taken out of zero rating by being works of enlargement, extension, or conversion – Value Added Tax Act 1994 Schedule 5 Group 8 Item 2 – appeal allowed [2013] UKFTT 374 (TC) Bailii Value Added Tax … Continue reading Astral Construction Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 2 Jul 2013

Principal and Fellows of Newnham College In the University of Cambridge v Revenue and Customs: HL 16 Apr 2008

A new library had been built for the college. A company owned by the college took a lease of it from the college, and reclaimed the input tax paid on construction. The company managed the library. Held: The Revenue’s appeal failed. The question was whether the college was in occupation of the library, either alone … Continue reading Principal and Fellows of Newnham College In the University of Cambridge v Revenue and Customs: HL 16 Apr 2008

Autologic Holdings Plc and others v Commissioners of Inland Revenue: HL 28 Jul 2005

Taxpayer companies challenged the way that the revenue restricted claims for group Corporation Tax relief for subsidiary companies in Europe. The issue was awaiting a decision of the European Court. The Revenue said that the claims now being made by other companies should proceed through the Commissioners who could implement European law directly. The taxpayers … Continue reading Autologic Holdings Plc and others v Commissioners of Inland Revenue: HL 28 Jul 2005

WHA Ltd and Another v Revenue and Customs: SC 1 May 2013

The Court was asked as to the effectiveness of a scheme, known as Project C, designed to minimise the overall liability to VAT of a group of companies involved in motor breakdown insurance. Held: The court dismissed WHA’s appeal. There had been no supply of repairs to WHA. The justifications for the project relied upon … Continue reading WHA Ltd and Another v Revenue and Customs: SC 1 May 2013

Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 30 Jul 2014

FTTTx Value Added Tax. Section 80 Value Added Tax Act 1994. Section 121(1) Finance Act 2008 (extended time limits for old VAT claims). Construction of agreement purporting to override the section 80 prima facie right to refund. Shift of evidential burden to HMRC; Wood v Holden [2006] EWCA Civ 26 applied. Held: agreement operated as … Continue reading Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 30 Jul 2014

Revenue and Customs v Iveco Ltd; UTTC 13 Jun 2016

References: [2016] UKUT 263 (TCC) Links: Bailii Ratio: UTTC VALUE ADDED TAX – whether section 80 VAT Act 1994 applies to claim to enforce directly effective right under article 11C(1) Sixth Directive to reduce taxable amounts to reflect rebates paid in periods before it was implemented in UK legislation – if so, whether claim made … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v Iveco Ltd; UTTC 13 Jun 2016

Grand Entertainments Company v Revenue and Customs; UTTC 3 May 2016

References: [2016] UKUT 209 (TCC) Links: Bailii Ratio: UTTC Claims for repayment of VAT – whether further claims for refunds were amendments to an earlier claim made within the time prescribed by s. 121 Finance Act 2008, or were separate claims out of time and barred by s. 80(4) Value Added Tax Act 1994 – … Continue reading Grand Entertainments Company v Revenue and Customs; UTTC 3 May 2016

Lex Services plc v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Customs and Excise: HL 4 Dec 2003

References: [2003] UKHL 67, Gazette 22-Jan-2004, [2004] STC 73 Links: House of Lords, Bailii Coram: Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Steyn, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Millett, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe When taking a car in part exchange, the company would initially offer the correct market value. If the customer wanted, the company would agree a higher … Continue reading Lex Services plc v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Customs and Excise: HL 4 Dec 2003

law index

Our law-index is a substantial selection from our database. Cases here are restricted in number by date and lack the additional facilities formerly available within lawindexpro. Please do enjoy this free version of the lawindex. Case law does not ‘belong’ to lawyers. Judgments are made up of words which can be read and understood (if … Continue reading law index