Scammell and Another v Farmer: ChD 22 May 2008
A challenge was made to will for the alleged lack of capacity of the testatrix who was said to have Alzheimers. The executrix was said to have destroyed hidden evidence. Held: The 2005 Act had restated the law on capacity in Banks, but had shifted the burden of proof. However in this case the common … Continue reading Scammell and Another v Farmer: ChD 22 May 2008