Citations: [1954] 1 QB 446 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Mentioned – Pirabakaran v Patel and Another CA 26-May-2006 The landlord had wanted possession. The tenant said that the landlord had been harassing him. The landlord said that the tenancy was a mixed residential and business tenancy and that the 1977 Act did not … Continue reading Regina v Brighton and Area Rent Tribunal Ex parte Slaughter: CA 1954
The lease demised property ‘from the 24th day of June 1985 for a term of twenty years’ with a break clause requiring six month’s notice. The break notice was mistakenly calculated from the anniversary of the lease, not the anniversary of the term. At first instance, the lease was held not to have been validly … Continue reading Garston and Others v Scottish Widows Fund and Life Assurance Society: CA 25 Jun 1998
The court was asked: ‘whether a company which has granted a lease of business premises in circumstances which would ordinarily mean that the provisions of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (‘the Act’) applied can invoke s. 24 A of that Act even though it did not have title to the premises the subject of … Continue reading Bell and others v General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation Ltd: CA 11 Dec 1997
An original Tenant is not liable for arrears arising on the tenancy extended by an assignee beyond the original term. The vesting of the leasehold estate in the tenant carried with it the burden of covenants that touched and concerned the land. Nourse LJ said that this category of covenant was ‘imprinted on the term’. … Continue reading City of London Corp v Fell and Others: Herbert Duncan Ltd v Cluttons (A firm): CA 31 Mar 1993
The tenant claimed Rent Act protection for his tenancy. He had been rehoused and began his tenancy in 1970 with the ground floor used as a shop, and the first floor as living accomodation. He later abandoned the business use. He appealed a finding that he did not have protection under the 1977 Act. Held: … Continue reading Tan and Another v Sitkowski: CA 1 Feb 2007
Notices had been served by tenants under the Acts. The properties were on a large estate where the freeholds had been divided and assigned to different bodies, and there were inconsistencies in identifying the landlords. The landlords served a counter-notice but it misidentified the landlord. The landlord appealed a finding that his notice was invalid. … Continue reading Lay and others v Ackerman and Another: CA 4 Mar 2004
When a court sets a new rent on an application for a new lease under the 1954 Act, the valuation date is, in practice, the date upon which it sets the new rent, taking effect from the date when the new lease is to be executed, although striclty according to the words of the section, … Continue reading Lovely and Orchard Services v Daejan Investments (Grove Hall) Ltd: QBD 1977
For some months whilst the tenants’ right to a new tenancy was being litigated they had ceased trading and had vacated the premises. They then succeeded before the Court of Appeal and started trading from the premises afresh. Their protection under the 1954 Act was again challenged because of the interruption. Held: Though it was … Continue reading I and H Caplan Limited v Caplan No. 2: ChD 1963
The lease agreement created a term for six months from 10 June 1920 and was to continue from half year to half year until determined. It was to be determined by three months’ written notice given by either party to the other provided that the landlords should not exercise that right unless they required the … Continue reading In re Midland Railway Co’s Agreement, Charles Clay and Sons Ltd v British Railways Board: CA 1971
The brewery sought possession of a public house, tied by type. The lessee claimed damages for breach of Art. 81 and a declaration that the Block Exemption was inapplicable to his lease. His appeal from the judge’s order in favour of the brewery was dismissed. The Court agreed with the majority in Greenalls. ‘There is … Continue reading Gibbs Mew Plc v Gemmell and Gibbs Mew Plc and Centric Pub Company Ltd v Gemmell: CA 22 Jul 1998
The tenancy was a long lease at a low rent under the 1954 Act, and so had continuing protection under the 1977 Act whilst occupied by the original tenant. The lease was assigned and registered. It had been conditional upon an application to purchase the reversion, which did not proceed. Held: subject to the effect … Continue reading Tiffany Investments Ltd and Another v Bircham and Co Nominees (No 2) Limited and others: CA 4 Dec 2003
One tenant of two joint tenants of a house left and was granted a new tenancy on condition that the existing one of the house, still occupied by her former partner, was determined. She gave a notice to quit as requested, the council claimed possession, and succeeded, even though she had sought to withdraw her … Continue reading Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council v Monk: HL 5 Dec 1991
The Office sought a declaration that the respondent and other banks were subject to the provisions of the Regulations in their imposition of bank charges to customer accounts, and in particular as to the imposition of penalties or charges for the breach of the overdraft limits. Held: The relevant terms were not exempt from assessment … Continue reading Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National Plc and seven Others: ComC 24 Apr 2008
Damages on Construction not as Agreed The appellant had contracted to build a swimming pool for the respondent, but, after agreeing to alter the specification to construct it to a certain depth, in fact built it to the original lesser depth, Damages had been awarded to the house owner against a builder at the cost … Continue reading Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth: HL 29 Jun 1995
The appellant challenged a sale and rent back transaction. He said that the proposed purchaser had misrepresented the transaction to them. The Court was asked s whether the home owners had interests whose priority was protected by virtue of section 29(2)(a)(ii) of, and Schedule 3, paragraph 2, to the Land Registration Act 2002. Held: The … Continue reading Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages Ltd and Others: SC 22 Oct 2014
Administrators of the claimant company asserted that the company had held informal leases of two hangars owned by the defendant, and also complained of their transfer at an undervalue. The first defendant said that the occupations were under license only. Held: The occupation, having the characteristics of a tenancy, was in fact a tenancy. As … Continue reading Mann Aviation Group (Engineering) Ltd v Longmint Aviation Ltd and Another: ChD 19 Aug 2011
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
Mrs Green had a tenancy of the ground floor and basement expiring on 1st April 1959. She occupied the basement for her business. Mrs Green sublet the ground floor to Mrs Bowes-Lyon, which she occupied for the purposes of her business, for a term due to expire on 31st March 1959. The landlord of Mrs … Continue reading Green v Bowes-Lyon: HL 1963
A landlord gave notice to the original lessees of business premises, under section 17 of the 1995 Act. It was sent by recorded delivery to the lessees’ last known residential address but was returned to the sender by the Royal Mail. Nevertheless the landlord contended that there had been good service under section 23(1) of … Continue reading Commercial Union Life Assurance Co Ltd v Moustafa: 1999
The claimant let a house to the defendant under an assured shorthold tenancy. In breach of condition, the defendant operated her licensed conveyancer’s business from the premises. Under an associated arrangement land was let to the defendant for her horses. On a possession action, the defendant asserted that the letting was a business tenancy protected … Continue reading Brown v Myerson: CA 21 Jul 1998
The landlord opposed the renewal of the tenancy saying that it wanted to run a golf club on the land. The tenant replied, saying that the businees had little prospect of success. Held: Where the landlord had expressed intention to commence business from premises after expiry of the lease and wanted occupation, the court should … Continue reading Dolgellau Golf Club v Hett: CA 3 Apr 1998
The tenant sought a new lease. The landlord resisted saying that it intended to carry out works of a substantail nature which would require it to have possession. The tenant responded that the works were not structural. Held: The words of the section should be read as they are. There is no explicit requirement for … Continue reading Ivorygrove Ltd v Global Grange Ltd: ChD 18 Jun 2003
Judges: Newey J Citations: [2011] EWHC 3130 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Landlord and Tenant Updated: 28 September 2022; Ref: scu.449019
Judges: Vos J Citations: [2011] EWHC 2043 (Ch), [2011] L andTR 27, [2012] 1 P andCR DG1 Links: Bailii Statutes: Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 30(1)(g) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Humber Oil Terminals Trustee Ltd v Associated British Ports ChD 24-Feb-2011 The claimant sought to renew its leases of docking facilities … Continue reading Humber Oil Terminals Trustee Ltd v Associated British Ports: ChD 29 Jul 2011
Pre-trial review of pending trial. The court ordered the hearing of a preliminary issue being: ‘the issue of whether the Defendant intends to occupy the holdings for the purposes, or partly for the purposes, of a business to be carried on by it therein, within the meaning of Section 30(1)(g) of the Landlord and Tenant … Continue reading Humber Oil Terminals Trustee Ltd v Associated British Ports: ChD 27 Jun 2011
The case concerned whether, under the Act, an incorporeal right of fishing, demised as part of a lease of an hotel, was part of the ‘premises’ for the purpose of the Act. Held: The standard conveyancing meaning of the word ‘premises’ has long been established as meaning the subject matter of the habendum of the … Continue reading Whitley v Stumbles: HL 1930
The question was whether under the 1977 Act the tenant occupied the premises for residential purposes. The landlord said that a business was also conducted from them. Held: The tenant had failed to establish that the business use had ceased. The court also his argument that, if his business use had ceased, he was protected … Continue reading Pulleng v Curran: CA 1980
The plaintiffs had bought a cottage subjecty to a tenancy to the defendant. They sought possession saying that she held under a tenancy at will. It was a renancy for her life but described as a tenancy at will. The judge had held that the other terms were quite inconsistent with a tenancy at will. … Continue reading Binions v Evans: CA 27 Jan 1972
Depending on the evidence, a stepped rent may well be the best way to determine the rack rent value over a period of years so that an arbitrator might properly make such an award. This was particularly so where the landlord was in serious breach of repairing obligations, but was expected to deal with the … Continue reading Fawke v Viscount Chelsea: 1980
The landlord served two notices under the 1954 Act. Held: The tenant’s counter-notice was out of time. If the first notice was valid, a counter-notice served within four months of the second but not the first was out of time. Citations: [1980] 1 WLR 55 Statutes: Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 24 Cited by: Cited … Continue reading Polyviou v Seeley: 1980
The appellant is the landlord of business premises. The tenant, the respondent to this appeal, brought proceedings under Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 for the grant of a new tenancy. The landlord resisted the application on the ground set out in section 30(1)(g), that he intended to occupy the premises for … Continue reading The Gulf Agencies Ltd v Ahmed: CA 3 Feb 2016
The tenant purported to exercise a break clause in the lease, requiring that the notice ‘must be expressed to be given under section 24(2) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954’. Though the notice was otherwise compliant, it did not refer to the 1954 Act. The landlords now appealed against a decision that it was. … Continue reading Friends Life Ltd v Siemens Hearing Instruments Ltd: CA 3 Apr 2014
The tenant had served a notice under the 2003 Act to acquire a new lease. The landlord in replying that he wished to redevelop the site, sought himself to define the extent of the ‘estate’ to include only the tenant’s apartment and a neighbouring one as ‘the whole or a substantial part of the premises … Continue reading Majorstake Ltd v Curtis: HL 6 Feb 2008
Tenants who used the premises which consisted of a yard, partly covered with cinders, on which stood only a wooden garage, covered about one-third of the site and a brick boundary wall adjacent to the highway for business purposes, applied for a new tenancy under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part 2. The landlords … Continue reading Housleys Ltd v Bloomer-Holt Ltd: CA 1966
Offence of Conspiracy to corrupt public morals The defendant appealed against his convictions for conspiracy to corrupt public morals, and for living from the earnings of prostitution. He said that first was not an offence known to common law. After it became unlawful for a prostitute to ply her trade on the streets, the defendant … Continue reading Shaw v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 4 May 1961
Notice of dismissal begins when received by worker The court was asked: ‘If an employee is dismissed on written notice posted to his home address, when does the notice period begin to run? Is it when the letter would have been delivered in the ordinary course of post? Or when it was in fact delivered … Continue reading Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v Haywood: SC 25 Apr 2018
The tenant had served a s26 notice, but it was invalid in specifying a date too early. Not seeing this, the landlord at first said it would not oppose a new tenancy, and gave no counter-notice and went on to apply for an interim rent. On later . .
The claimant let a house to the defendant under an assured shorthold tenancy. In breach of condition, the defendant operated her licensed conveyancer’s business from the premises. Under an associated arrangement land was let to the defendant for her . .
