The applicants were accountants who had practised as such for some years when a new statute came into force which required then to register. Their applications were refused. Held: Article 1PI was engaged. In paragraphs 41 and 42 the Court said this: ‘The Court agrees with the Commission that the right relied upon by the … Continue reading Van Marle And Others v The Netherlands: ECHR 26 Jun 1986
(Commission/admissibility) The applicant’s lease was forfeited on her non-payment of a service charge and possession was ordered. Her primary claim was made (unsuccessfully) under article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. But she also complained that her eviction from her home constituted an unjustified interference with the right to respect for her home … Continue reading Di Palma v United Kingdom: ECHR 1 Dec 1986
Three applicants had lied on entry to secure admission, stayed for a considerable time, and had been treated as illegal immigrants under section 33(1). The fourth’s claim that upon being returned he would been killed, had been rejected without investigation. Held: A claim to refugee status was not an exception to the ban on appeals … Continue reading Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Bugdaycay: HL 19 Feb 1986
Freedom of expression, as secured in paragraph 1 of Article 10, constitutes one of the essential foundations of a democratic society and one of the basic conditions for its progress and for each individual’s self-fulfilment. Subject to paragraph 2, it is applicable not only to ‘information’ or ‘ideas’ that are favourably received or regarded as … Continue reading Lingens v Austria: ECHR 8 Jul 1986
The state must act in a manner calculated to allow those concerned to lead a normal family life. Citations: (1986) 49 DR 67 Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights 8 Jurisdiction: Human Rights Cited by: Cited – Regina v London Borough of Barnet ex parte G; Regina v London Borough of Lambeth ex parte W; … Continue reading Z and E v Austria: ECHR 1986
The principles of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights must be taken into consideration in community law. The principle of effective judicial control laid down in article 6 of Council Directive 76/207, a principle which underlies the constitutional traditions common to the member states and which is laid down in articles 6 … Continue reading Johnston v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary: ECJ 15 May 1986
The Comission found inadmissible an allegation that Sweden had infringed Article 8 by not providing financial assistance to a mother to allow her to stay at home to look after her children, rather than placing them in a creche and going out to work. ‘The Convention does not as such guarantee the right to public … Continue reading Andersson and Kullman v Sweden: ECHR 1986
That a detainee may be heard either in person or, where necessary, through some form of representation can be a fundamental procedural guarantee in matters of deprivation of liberty. Article 5(4)was inspired by the English law of habeas corpus. Citations: [1986] ECHR 12, 9862/82, (1986) 9 EHRR 71 Links: Worldlii Statutes: European Convention on Human … Continue reading Sanchez-Reisse v Switzerland: ECHR 21 Oct 1986
Krugerrand coins were seized by the Commissioners and the claimant was unsuccessful in obtaining their restoration under what is now section 152(b) of the 1979 Act. It was argued that the request for restoration of the coins amounted to a determination of a criminal charge. Having noted that criminal charges under domestic law had been … Continue reading AGOSI v The United Kingdom: ECHR 24 Oct 1986
The claimants challenged the 1967 Act, saying that it deprived them of their property rights when lessees were given the power to purchase the freehold reversion. Held: Article 1 (P1-1) in substance guarantees the right of property. Allowing a mechanism for the compulsory transfer of the freehold interest in the house and the land to … Continue reading James and Others v The United Kingdom: ECHR 21 Feb 1986
The defendant was convicted of causing actual bodily harm, mainly on the basis of statements which his wife and daughter had given to the police. His wife and daughter took advantage of their right not to give evidence at his trial and so could not be cross-examined on their statements. Held: Where a conviction is … Continue reading Unterpertinger v Austria: ECHR 24 Nov 1986
A prisoner sought an order for his removal from a prison found to have a regime which breached his human rights. The Crown replied that an order could not be made under s21 of the 1947 Act. Held: The prisoner had followed through his rights to petition the governor. Had he done so and failed, … Continue reading Reclaiming Motion In Petition of Scott Davidson for Judicial Review of A Decision To Continue To Detain the Prisoner In Inhuman and Degrading Prison C: SCS 18 Dec 2001
The housing authority in Guernsey refused to allow the applicants to occupy the house they owned there. Held: The house in question was the applicants’ home because, although they had been absent from Guernsey for many years, they had not established any other home elsewhere in the United Kingdom and had retained ‘sufficient continuing links’ … Continue reading Gillow v The United Kingdom: ECHR 24 Nov 1986
ECHR Judgment : Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 – Protection of property : Fifth Section 74288/14, [2021] ECHR 823 Bailii European Convention on Human Rights Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 04 December 2021; Ref: scu.668680
The defendants appealed against their convictions for murder, saying that their defences of duress had been wrongly disallowed. Held: Duress is not a defence available on a charge of murder. When a defence of duress is raised, the test is whether the threat was so serious as would cause a reasonable man in the same … Continue reading Regina v Howe etc: HL 19 Feb 1986
Extension oh Human Rights Beyond Borders The appellants complained that the system set up by the respondent where Home Office officers were placed in Prague airport to pre-vet applicants for asylum from Romania were dsicriminatory in that substantially more gypsies were refused entry than others, and that it was contrary to the obligations of the … Continue reading Regina v Immigration Officer at Prague Airport and another, ex parte European Roma Rights Centre and others: HL 9 Dec 2004
The applicants complained that on the nationalisation of their interests under the 1977 Act, the compensation awarded had been inadequate and did not reflect their true value.
Held: Convention jurisprudence permits a proportionate restriction . .
The Commission challenged the compatibility of the NI law relating to banning nearly all abortions with Human Rights Law. It now challenged a decision that it did not have standing to bring the case.
Held: (Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson . .
The Court concludes that in Northern Ireland:
(i) There is no general right to abortion whether under the common law or under statute.
(ii) The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission (‘the Commission’) has legal standing under the . .
The position of married couples is not comparable with the position of unmarried couples, so that differences in treatment between them do not amount to discrimination within the meaning of article 14 of the convention. . .
. .
Although the Constitutional Court had no jurisdiction to rule on the merits of the dispute, its decision was ‘capable of affecting the outcome of the claim’.
The court considered a widow’s supplementary pension arising from her husband’s death . .
Hudoc Preliminary objection rejected (incompatibility); No violation of Art. 10 . .
Hudoc Preliminary objection rejected (incompatibility); Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion); No violation of Art. 10 . .
Hudoc Preliminary objection rejected (incompatibility); Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion); Violation of Art. 5-1; Pecuniary damage – claim rejected; Non-pecuniary damage – claim partially rejected; . .
Hudoc Judgment (Just satisfaction) Pecuniary damage – financial award; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses award – domestic proceedings; Costs and expenses award – Convention proceedings . .
. .
Appeal by the Attorney General and Department of Justice against an Order declaring that sections 58 and 59 of the 1861 Act and section 25 of the 1945 Act were incompatible with Article 8 of ECHR insofar as it is an offence:
(i) to procure a . .
The applicant had been born and registered as a female, but later came to receive treatment and to live as a male. He complained that the respondent had failed to amend his birth certificate.
Held: The court accepted that, by failing to confer . .
Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Preliminary objection rejected (victim); Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion); Violation of Art. 8; Pecuniary damage – claim rejected; Non-pecuniary damage . .
Four articles in the People all covered the same story about Esther Rantzen’s organisation, Childline, suggesting that the plaintiff had protected a teacher who had revealed to Childline abuses of children occurring at a school where he taught, by . .
. .
The court was asked whether the applicant’s entitlement to a statutory sickness allowance, which was a contributory scheme but for which she had not registered due to illness, was a civil right within the meaning of article 6.
Held: The . .
The applicant was not entitled in domestic law to succeed to a tenancy on the death of her partner. The aim of the legislation is question was to protect the family, a goal similar to the protection of the right to respect for family life guaranteed . .
The claimant was a serving a life sentence. During prison disciplinary proceedings he was refused legal and other assistance, and an outside tribunal on the basis that since any finding would not lead to any loss of remission or extra time, his rights to a fairtrial were not engaged. Held: The prisoner’s appeal was dismissed. … Continue reading Tangney v The Governor of HMP Elmley and Another: CA 29 Jul 2005
Hudoc Judgment (Just satisfaction) Pecuniary damage – financial award; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award. Citations: 2614/65, [1972] ECHR 2, [1972] ECHR 2 Links: orldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights 86 Jurisdiction: Human Rights Citing: See Also – Ringeisen v Austria ECHR 16-Jul-1971 The Austrian District and Regional Real Property Transactions Commission refused to … Continue reading Ringeisen v Austria: ECHR 22 Jun 1972
The Board heard an appeal against a final order of suspension for 12 months. It considered Madan’s case. Held: The Board wished to reserve their opinion on the reasoning in the judgments that it was the application of Article 6 which required the IOC to weigh the doctor’s interests against the protection of the public. … Continue reading Choudhary v General Medical Council: PC 2001
The claimants had been convicted of murder, but their tariffs had not yet been set when the 2003 Act came into effect. They said that the procedure under which their sentence tarriffs were set were not compliant with their human rights in that the . .
ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Fifth Section Committee Citations: 14486/07, [2019] ECHR 288 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 28 June 2022; Ref: scu.636063
The defendant sought to set aside a possession order made where he did not know of the proceedings. Held: The judge had a discretion, not a duty, to set aside a possession order made in such circumstances. Human rights law required the court to allow a defendant a right to be heard, but if on … Continue reading Akram v Adam: CA 30 Nov 2004
Citations: 12325/86, [1991] ECHR 51, [1993] ECHR 51 Links: Worldlii, Worldlii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.211539
Parents applied for secondary school places, indicating three single sex schools. This was from a clear religious conviction. The local authority allocated another place, without giving reasons, but did provide a pamphlet setting out its policy, which showed that one criterion was a preference for a single-sex school. Held: The need to respect religious views … Continue reading Regina (K) v Newham London Borough Council and Another: QBD 19 Feb 2002
ECHR Judgment : Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 – Protection of property : Third Section Committee ECHR Judgment : Pecuniary damage – claim dismissed : Third Section Committee Citations: 47386/17, [2019] ECHR 225, [2021] ECHR 177 Links: Bailii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 27 June 2022; … Continue reading Ooo Gastronom v Russia: ECHR 19 Mar 2019
ECHR Judgment : Remainder inadmissible : Fifth Section Citations: 14237/07, [2018] ECHR 826 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.628866
ECHR Judgment : Article 6 – Right to a fair trial : First Section Committee Citations: 49253/11, [2018] ECHR 848 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.628867
ECHR Judgment : Preliminary objection dismissed : Third Section Citations: 23608/16, [2018] ECHR 863 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.628845
ECHR Judgment : Article 6 – Right to a fair trial : Fourth Section Committee Citations: 48616/14, [2018] ECHR 760 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.628748
(Commission) The applicant complained that the court had refused to allow him to withdraw his plea of guilty: ‘It is in the first place for the domestic authorities to determine rules regulating procedural aspects of criminal proceedings, subject to the supervisory jurisdiction of the Convention organs in considering the fairness of proceedings (cf. the Commission’s … Continue reading RO v United Kingdom: ECHR 11 May 1994
ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Second Section Committee Citations: 4670/16, [2022] ECHR 372 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.677863
ECHR Judgment : Article 6 – Right to a fair trial : Fourth Section Committee Citations: 60475/14, [2019] ECHR 286 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 23 June 2022; Ref: scu.636073
ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Third Section Committee Citations: 48749/16, [2018] ECHR 790 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 23 June 2022; Ref: scu.628869
ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Fourth Section Committee Citations: 8797/16, [2018] ECHR 838 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 23 June 2022; Ref: scu.628861
ECHR Judgment : Article 3 – Prohibition of torture : Second Section Committee Citations: 20546/16, [2018] ECHR 864 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 23 June 2022; Ref: scu.628854
ECHR Judgment : Article 6 – Right to a fair trial : First Section Committee Citations: 39186/11, [2018] ECHR 793 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 23 June 2022; Ref: scu.628862
Citations: 6320/06, [2010] ECHR 864 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 23 June 2022; Ref: scu.418491
ECHR Judgment : Article 6 – Right to a fair trial : Second Section Committee Citations: 65102/14, [2022] ECHR 370 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 23 June 2022; Ref: scu.677865
ECHR Judgment : Article 6 – Right to a fair trial : First Section Committee Citations: 4080/21, [2022] ECHR 351 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 23 June 2022; Ref: scu.677867
ECHR Judgment : No Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 – Protection of property : First Section Citations: 16140/15, [2022] ECHR 378 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 23 June 2022; Ref: scu.677860
The applicant questioned the compatibility of s185 of the 1996 Act with Human Rights law. The family sought emergency housing. The child of the family, found to be in priority housing need, was subject also to immigration control. Though the matter had been settled the court was invited to pursue the decision. Held: The Act … Continue reading Morris, Regina (on the Application of) v Westminster City Council and Another: Admn 7 Oct 2004
Citations: 44872/98, [2002] ECHR 161 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.212866
Citations: 49384/99, [2002] ECHR 155 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.212863
Citations: 40282/98, [1999] ECHR 99 Links: Worldlii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.211586
Citations: 37565/97, [2001] ECHR 869 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.212743
‘in principle, the right to freedom of religion as understood in the Convention rules out any appreciation by the state of the legitimacy of religious beliefs or of the manner in which these are expressed’ Citations: 45701/99, (2002) 35 EHRR 306, [2001] ECHR 860 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights 9 Jurisdiction: … Continue reading Metropolitan Church Of Bessarabia And Others v Moldova: ECHR 13 Dec 2001
Citations: 24940/94, [2001] ECHR 862 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.212739
Citations: 37527/97, [2001] ECHR 865 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.212741
Citations: 24945/94, [2001] ECHR 864 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.212740
Citations: 49310/99, [2001] ECHR 796, [2001] ECHR 805 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.212686
Citations: 44386/98, [2001] ECHR 790, [2001] ECHR 799 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.212680
Citations: 44497/98, [2001] ECHR 666, [2001] ECHR 672 Links: worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.212586
Citations: 19686/92, [2001] ECHR 534 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.212486
ECHR Judgment : Article 6 – Right to a fair trial : First Section Citations: 49281/15, [2022] ECHR 364 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.677864
Citations: 39920/98, [2001] ECHR 482, [2001] ECHR 486 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 19 June 2022; Ref: scu.212446
Citations: 29862/96, [2001] ECHR 465, [2001] ECHR 469 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 19 June 2022; Ref: scu.212434
Citations: 34686/97, [2001] ECHR 390, [2001] ECHR 394 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 19 June 2022; Ref: scu.212381
Citations: 43575/98, [2001] ECHR 398, [2001] ECHR 402 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 19 June 2022; Ref: scu.212386
Citations: 44486/98, [2001] ECHR 202 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 19 June 2022; Ref: scu.212272
Citations: 47786/99, [2001] ECHR 164, [2001] ECHR 167 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 19 June 2022; Ref: scu.212244
Citations: 46509/99, [2000] ECHR 633 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 19 June 2022; Ref: scu.212086
Citations: 28660/95, [2000] ECHR 655, [2000] ECHR 664 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 19 June 2022; Ref: scu.212103
Citations: 43079/98, [2000] ECHR 319 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 19 June 2022; Ref: scu.211860
Citations: 30346/96, [2000] ECHR 486 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 19 June 2022; Ref: scu.211963
Citations: 35586/97, [1999] ECHR 58 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 19 June 2022; Ref: scu.211572
Citations: 42786/98, [2004] ECHR 7 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 19 June 2022; Ref: scu.211442
ECHR Judgment : No Article 2 – Right to life : Fifth Section Citations: 31754/18, [2022] ECHR 380 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 19 June 2022; Ref: scu.677861
The care worker’s appeal failed. The system for disciplining care workers and placing them on lists was required to be human rights compliant. Lord Justice May said: ‘There is an obvious and unchallenged public interest in having an appropriate system for protecting vulnerable adults and children from the risk of harm from unsuitable carers. It … Continue reading Regina (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health: CA 2 Jan 2008
The claimant sought increased maternity pay. Before beginning her maternity leave she had been awarded a pay increase, but it was not backdated so as to affect the period upon which the calculation of her average pay was based. The court made a detailed comparison of the regimes for protection under the Employment Rights Act … Continue reading Alabaster v Barclays Bank Plc and Another: CA 3 May 2005
Private Hearings are Not in Secret H sought an order restricting reporting of the divorce financial remedy proceedings, or an anonymity order. Held: The application was refused save as to identification of the children, and certain tax matters. The a hearing was listed as in Private restricted only that certain people only were entitled to … Continue reading Gallagher v Gallagher (No 1) (Reporting Restrictions): FC 13 Jun 2022
Citations: 7906/07, [2010] ECHR 924 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 18 June 2022; Ref: scu.418486
ECHR Judgment : Article 2 – Right to life : First Section Committee Citations: 14385/18, [2022] ECHR 356 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 18 June 2022; Ref: scu.677866
ECHR Judgment : No Article 5 – Right to liberty and security : Grand Chamber Citations: 35553/12, [2018] ECHR 856 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.628860
The court was asked whether the Claimant’s proposed deportation to Jamaica, following his conviction and imprisonment for a very serious criminal offence, involves a violation of article 14 in conjunction with article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (‘ECHR’), contrary to the Human Rights Act 1998 (‘the Human Rights Act’). The discrimination is … Continue reading Johnson, Regina (on The Application of) v The Secretary of State for The Home Department: Admn 17 Jul 2014
Since company director disqualification proceedings were not criminal proceedings, even though they involved the imposition of a penalty, they remained civil proceedings in nature. The European Convention on Human Rights did not apply to protect a director against having material, disclosed by him under compulsion in the course of an insolvency, being used against him … Continue reading In Re Westminster Property Management Ltd: ChD 19 Jan 2000
ECHR Judgment (Just Satisfaction) – Pecuniary damage – claim rejected; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses partial award – domestic proceedings; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention proceedings. Citations: 12325/86, 14992/89 Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.227240
Citations: 185/10, [2010] ECHR 868 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.418502
Citations: 21455/04, [2010] ECHR 863 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.418496
Citations: 29486/95, [2004] ECHR 153 Links: Worldlii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.211505
ECHR Judgment : Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life : Third Section Committee Citations: 5123/09, [2022] ECHR 350 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.677869
ECHR Judgment : Article 6 – Right to a fair trial : Third Section Committee Citations: 2759/19, [2022] ECHR 361 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 16 June 2022; Ref: scu.677868
ECHR Judgment : Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life : First Section Committee Citations: 48820/19, [2022] ECHR 357 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 16 June 2022; Ref: scu.677862
