(i) A decision of the Secretary of State not to grant indefinite leave to remain to a person subject to the restricted leave policy (‘the RL policy’) does not normally engage Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. However, Article 8 may be engaged by a decision to refuse to grant indefinite leave … Continue reading MBT, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for The Home Department (Restricted Leave; ILR; Disability Discrimination): UTIAC 13 Dec 2019
The police had arrested three peaceful but vociferous preachers when some members of a crowd gathered round them threatened hostility. Held: Freedom of speech means nothing unless it includes the freedom to be irritating, contentious, eccentric, heretical, unwelcome and provocative provided it did not tend to provoke violence. There was no reasonable inference available in … Continue reading Redmond-Bate v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 23 Jul 1999
Judges: Longmore, Bean, Moylan LJJ Citations: [2019] EWCA Civ 1334, [2019] WLR(D) 433 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Equality Act 2010 149 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Housing, Discrimination Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.640096
Challenge to housing policy as discriminatory against Irish travellers or Kurdish refugees. Judges: Underhill VP, Lewison, King LJ Citations: [2019] EWCA Civ 692, [2019] WLR(D) 244, [2019] PTSR 1738 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Housing Act 1996 166A, Children Act 2004 11(2), Equality Act 2010 19 29 149 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Appeal from – … Continue reading Ward and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v The London Borough of Hillingdon and Others: CA 16 Apr 2019
Mr Kanu, aged 48, had physical problems, including back pain, hepatitis B, hypertension and haemorrhoids, as well as psychotic symptoms and suicidal ideation. His wife assisted him in taking the necessary drugs, but stress would raise his hypertension to ‘quite dangerous levels’, requiring an increase in the dose of the relevant drugs. An order for … Continue reading Kanu v The London Borough of Southwark: CA 29 Jul 2014
The claimant sought a declaration that the duty set out in the 1995 Act applies to the discharge of duties, and to the exercise of powers, by local housing authorities under Part VII of the Housing Act 1996 being the part entitled ‘Homelessness’. The defendant argued that (1) the section concerned only the general formulation … Continue reading Pieretti v London Borough of Enfield: CA 12 Oct 2010
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
The claimant who required support from the Council for his ADHD disorder challenged the respondent’s budget insofar as it limited support for children’s services in the Revenue Budget. Ge said that in making its decision to cut the budget, the Council unlawfully failed to comply either with (i) its obligations under section 507B of the … Continue reading Hunt v North Somerset Council: Admn 18 Jul 2012
The applicants, intending university students, challenged the decision to raise to andpound;9,000 per annum, the fees which might be charged by qualifying universities.Elias LJ said: ‘Contrary to a submission advanced by Ms Mountfield, I do not accept that this means that it is for the court to determine whether appropriate weight has been given to … Continue reading Hurley and Moore, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills: Admn 17 Feb 2012
Challenge to process used for advertising an invitation to tender for its welfare rights and advice services within the district. Held: Davis J said that the: ‘general regard to issues of equality is not the same as having specific regard, by way of conscious approach to the statutory criteria.’ Judges: Davis J Citations: [2009] EWHC … Continue reading Meany and Others, Regina (On the Application of) v Harlow District Council: Admn 9 Mar 2009
The claimant sought judicial review of the decision made by TfL not to allow an advertisement on behalf of the Trust to appear on the outside of its buses. It was to read: ‘NOT GAY! EX-GAY, POST-GAY AND PROUD. GET OVER IT!’. The decision was said to be based on the resondent’s policies. The respondent … Continue reading Core Issues Trust v Transport for London: Admn 22 Mar 2013
The appellants claimed housing benefit. They appealed against rejection of their claims that the imposition of limits to the maximum sums payable, ‘the bedroom tax’, was unlawful on equality grounds. The claimants either had disabilities, or lived with dependent family with disabilities, or live in what are known as ‘sanctuary scheme’ homes (accommodation specially adapted … Continue reading MA and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: SC 9 Nov 2016
When a local traffic authority made experimental traffic orders under section 9 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, did it discharge the ‘public sector equality duty’ under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010? Judges: Sir Keith Lindblom (Senior President of Tribunals) Lord Justice Males And Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing Citations: [2022] EWCA Civ … Continue reading Sheakh, Regina (on The Application of) v London Borough of Lambeth Council: CA 5 Apr 2022
Judges: Irwin, Hickinbottom LJJ, Sir Jack Beatson Citations: [2018] EWCA Civ 1925, [2018] WLR(D) 556 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: National Health Service Act 2006 1 1C, Equality Act 2010 149(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Health Professions, Discrimination Updated: 26 April 2022; Ref: scu.621537
The appellants, all severely disabled appealed against the refusal of their judicial review of the substantial withdrawal by the Council of a service providing them with transport to local day care facilities. They said that the council had failed in its dutes to consider their individual cases, to consult properly, and in its public sector … Continue reading Robson and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Salford City Council: CA 20 Jan 2015
The court was asked as to the duty of local housing authorities towards homeless people who claim to be ‘vulnerable’, and therefore to have ‘a priority need’ for the provision of housing accommodation under Part VII of the Housing Act 1996. Those . .
The claimant said that a scheme drawn by the defendant for compensating British civilians interned by the Japanese during the second world war was indirectly discriminatory on racial grounds by requiring a national origin link with the UK. She had . .
