The claimant had granted a lease of an aircraft to the defendants, undertaking in the agreement that the aircrat would be airworthy. It now claimed payment under the agreement, the defendant saying it had not been airworthy and had to be withdrawn from service, the costs of the repairs exceeding the value of the aircraft.
Held:
Hamblen J
[2010] EWHC 923 (Comm), [2010] 1 CLC 581
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal from – Olympic Airlines Sa v ACG Acquisition XX Llc CA 17-Dec-2012
The airline had been placed in liquidation in Greece. The liquidator now appealed against orders for payment of debts and costs to the respondent . .
See Also – Olympic Airlines Sa v ACG Acquisition XX Llc CA 17-Apr-2013
The parties disputed their mutual obligations under aircraft leasing agreements. The insolvent airline said that in signing to accept the condition of the aircraft on delivery, it had not created an estoppel against itself when the aircraft later . .
At Commerial Court – Olympic Airlines Sa v ACG Acquisition Xx Llc CA 17-Jun-2014
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Transport, Contract
Updated: 09 January 2022; Ref: scu.416129