Acts
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
Search Results for: Arbitration Act 1996 33 68
A and Another v C and Others: ComC 31 Jul 2020
Judges: His Honour Judge Mark Pelling QC Citations: [2020] EWHC 3045 (Comm) Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 33 68(2) 73 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Costs, Arbitration Updated: 18 November 2022; Ref: scu.682743
ED and F Man Sugar Ltd v Belmont Shipping Ltd: ComC 18 Nov 2011
Allegation of serious irregularity in arbitration. Held: The request was refused: ‘the present case can hardly be said to be an extreme case which justice calls out to be corrected.’.‘Arbitrators are not barred from asking a party whether it has considered raising a different case from that which it has advanced but section 33 of … Continue reading ED and F Man Sugar Ltd v Belmont Shipping Ltd: ComC 18 Nov 2011
Republic of Kazakhstan v World Wide Minerals Ltd and Another: ComC 23 Nov 2020
Challenge by the claimant under s.68 of the 1996 Act to an award entitled ‘Final Award on Merits’ founded on an assertion by TRK that the Tribunal awarded damages to the defendants by reference to an argument that the defendants had not advanced . .
Aoot Kalmneft v Glencore International Ag and Another: ComC 27 Jul 2001
When asking whether the time for appeal against an arbitrator’s award should be extended, the court should look at several circumstances, including the length of the delay; whether the party was acting reasonably in all the circumstances in delaying; whether the other party had contributed to the delay; whether other party would suffer irremediable prejudice … Continue reading Aoot Kalmneft v Glencore International Ag and Another: ComC 27 Jul 2001
Sinclair v Woods of Winchester Ltd Harrison: QBD 14 Jul 2005
The court set out the principles applicable in an application under section 68: ‘a) Perhaps the best summary of the applicable principles relating to section 68 generally, which lies at the heart of these applications is by His Honour Judge Humphrey Lloyd QC in Weldon Plant Ltd. v. The Commission for the New Towns [2000] … Continue reading Sinclair v Woods of Winchester Ltd Harrison: QBD 14 Jul 2005
Isabella Shipowner Sa v Shagang Shipping Co Ltd: ComC 26 Apr 2012
The claimant ship owners challenged an award on two grounds. First, with permission, the owners appealed under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 on the following question of law: ‘Whether, as a matter of law, owners were entitled to refuse early re-delivery of the Aquafaith (the vessel) at Jintang on 9 August 2011 and … Continue reading Isabella Shipowner Sa v Shagang Shipping Co Ltd: ComC 26 Apr 2012
Bandwidth Shipping Corporation v Intaari (‘Magdalena Oldendorrf’): CA 17 Oct 2007
An arbitrator hearing a case, and who appreciated that counsel had failed to take a point, should draw counsel’s attention to the point. No duty could arise if the arbitrator did not himself see the point. An applicant under section 68 faces a high hurdle in establishing serious irregularity, reflecting the reluctance of the courts … Continue reading Bandwidth Shipping Corporation v Intaari (‘Magdalena Oldendorrf’): CA 17 Oct 2007
Miller and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Exiting The European Union: SC 24 Jan 2017
Parliament’s Approval if statute rights affected In a referendum, the people had voted to leave the European Union. That would require a notice to the Union under Article 50 TEU. The Secretary of State appealed against an order requiring Parliamentary approval before issuing the notice, he saying that the notice could be given under the … Continue reading Miller and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Exiting The European Union: SC 24 Jan 2017
Warborough Investments Ltd v S Robinson and Sons (Holdings) Ltd: CA 10 Jun 2003
The applicant sought remission of the decision of the arbitrator on a rent review. The arbitrator had taken a different approach from that suggested by either party’s expert. Held: Arbitrators should be give a wide margin of appreciation. Even if there had been an irregularity, the arbitrator had not gone so far wrong in coming … Continue reading Warborough Investments Ltd v S Robinson and Sons (Holdings) Ltd: CA 10 Jun 2003
Ballast Plc v The Burrell Company (Construction Management) Limited: SCS 21 Jun 2001
In a building dispute, the arbitrator found that the parties had departed from the standard JCT terms, and declined to arbitrate. The parties said that when called upon to act he ‘shall’ do so. The adjudicator had misconstrued his powers. It was clear that there was a proper dispute requiring his decision, and he was … Continue reading Ballast Plc v The Burrell Company (Construction Management) Limited: SCS 21 Jun 2001
Travelers Insurance Company Ltd v XYZ: SC 30 Oct 2019
Challenge to the making of a non-party costs order under section 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 against the product liability insurer of one of the defendants in litigation being managed under a Group Litigation Order (‘GLO’). Many of the claimants in the successful action were not insured, and Travelers, the defendant’s insurers resisted … Continue reading Travelers Insurance Company Ltd v XYZ: SC 30 Oct 2019
Minister of Finance (Incorporated) and Another v International Petroleum Investment Company and Another: ComC 4 Nov 2021
This unusual arbitration claim seeks to challenge under s.67 or s.68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (‘the Act’) a Consent Award dated 9 May 2017 by which an LCIA arbitration between the parties, LCIA Ref. 163357 (‘Arbitration 1’), was concluded. Mr Justice Andrew Baker [2021] EWHC 2949 (Comm) Bailii Arbitration Act 1996 67 68 England … Continue reading Minister of Finance (Incorporated) and Another v International Petroleum Investment Company and Another: ComC 4 Nov 2021
Aiden Shipping Co Ltd v Interbulk Ltd (The ‘Vimeira’): HL 1986
References: [1986] AC 965, [1986] 2 WLR 1051, [1986] 2 All ER 409 Coram: Lord Goff of Chieveley A claim had been made against charterers by the ship owners, and in turn by the charterers against their sub-charterers. Notice of motion were issued after arbitration awards were not accepted. When heard, costs awards were made, … Continue reading Aiden Shipping Co Ltd v Interbulk Ltd (The ‘Vimeira’): HL 1986
Henderson v Henderson; 20 Jul 1843
References: (1843) 3 Hare 100, [1843] EngR 917, (1843) 67 ER 313 Links: Commonlii Coram: Sir James Wigram VC The court set down the principles to be applied in abuse of process cases, where a matter was raised again which should have been dealt with in earlier proceedings. Sir James Wigram VC said: ‘In trying … Continue reading Henderson v Henderson; 20 Jul 1843
law index
Our law-index is a substantial selection from our database. Cases here are restricted in number by date and lack the additional facilities formerly available within lawindexpro. Please do enjoy this free version of the lawindex. Case law does not ‘belong’ to lawyers. Judgments are made up of words which can be read and understood (if … Continue reading law index
