Zissis v Lukomski and Another: CA 5 Apr 2006

The court considered an appeal against an award under the 1996 Act. The appeal had been brought under Part 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Held: The appeal was by virtue of the 1996 Act, and as such was a statutory appeal, and should have been brought under Part 52, not Part 8.


Sir Peter Gibson


[2006] EWCA Civ 341, Times 24-Apr-2006




Party Wall etc Act 1996, Civil Procedure Rules Part 8 Part 52


England and Wales


CitedE I Du Pont De Nemours and Company v S T Dupont; Du Pont Trade Mark CA 10-Oct-2003
The court considered the circumstances under which a Hearing Officer’s decision could be reversed on appeal: ‘Those experienced in cases such as these, such as the Hearing Officer, would have known that the sort of evidence normally adduced on . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Arbitration, Land

Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.240110