Zahid v Regina: CACD 5 Oct 2010

The defendant appealed against his conviction for possession of expanding ammunition, on the judge ruling that the offence was one of strict liability.

Judges:

Hooper, Flaux, Spencer LJJ

Citations:

[2010] EWCA Crim 2158

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Firearms Act 1968 5(1A)(f)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedDeyemi and Another, Regina v CACD 13-Aug-2007
After a judge’s ruling as to strict liability for the possession of a prohibited weapon, the defendants pleaded guilty. They now appealed against conviction. The judge had sentenced them on the basis that liability for possession was strict.
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Crime

Updated: 25 August 2022; Ref: scu.424867