The claimant professional footballer sought to restrain publication by the defendants of details of their sexual relations. He said that the woman had sought to blackmail him. A newspaper had printed an inaccurate story, but not in a way which breached the without notice order made.
Held: Where a party seeking to restrain freedom of expression wishes the Court to give weight to the impact on others, he will generally be expected to adduce evidence from those others, or explain why such evidence is not before the Court.
Warby J
[2015] EWHC 826 (QB)
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – NT 1 and NT 2 v Google Llc QBD 13-Apr-2018
Right to be Forgotten is not absolute
The two claimants separately had criminal convictions from years before. They objected to the defendant indexing third party web pages which included personal data in the form of information about those convictions, which were now spent. The claims . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Media
Updated: 29 December 2021; Ref: scu.544847
