Yankov v Bulgaria: ECHR 11 Dec 2003

Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 3 ; Violation of Art. 10 ; Violation of Art. 13 ; Violation of Art. 5-3 ; Violation of Art. 5-4 ; Violation of Art. 5-5 ; Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award
39084/97, [2003] ECHR 680, [2003] ECHR 685
Worldlii, Bailii
Human Rights
Cited by:
CitedHirst v United Kingdom (2) ECHR 6-Oct-2005
(Grand Chamber) The applicant said that whilst a prisoner he had been banned from voting. The UK operated with minimal exceptions, a blanket ban on prisoners voting.
Held: Voting is a right not a privilege. It was a right central in a . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 11 January 2021; Ref: scu.190186