High Court of Australia – For an unlawful means conspiracy, the plaintiff must prove that the combination or agreement was to engage in conduct which amounted to unlawful means
Judges:
Dixon CJ (1), Fullagar(2), Kitto(3), Taylor(4) and Menzies(5) JJ
Citations:
(1959) 103 CLR 30, [1959] ALR 1383, (1959) 33 ALJR 269
Jurisdiction:
Australia
Cited by:
Cited – Total Network Sl v Customs and Excise Commissioners CA 31-Jan-2007
The defendants suspected a carousel VAT fraud. The defendants appealed a finding that there was a viable cause of action alleging a ‘conspiracy where the unlawful means alleged is a common law offence of cheating the public revenue’. The defendants . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Torts – Other
Updated: 10 May 2022; Ref: scu.248356
