EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity
On a hearing before the EAT findings of fact as to allegations of actual and apparent bias by an employment judge were rejected applying Abegaze.
This is a classic case where a claimant is dissatisfied as to the dismissal of her case where Rimer J in Hackney LBC v Sagnia UKEAT/0600/03 observed the false logic in which a claimant says I have a strong case, I have lost so the court must be biased against me. This judge was not biased nor gave the appearance of bias against the claimant, these allegations are unfounded.
Citations:
[2009] UKEAT 0393 – 08 – 2307
Links:
Citing:
Cited – London Borough of Hackney and others v Sagnia EAT 6-Oct-2005
EAT Race Discrimination; Victimisation
Whether the employment tribunal’s findings of race discrimination and victimisation were tainted by bias, perversity, irrationality or other errors of law. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 30 July 2022; Ref: scu.361515