Wileman v Minilec Engineering Ltd: 1988

The principles of Ladd v Marshall apply also in employment tribunal proceedings.

Citations:

[1988] ICR 318

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedLadd v Marshall CA 29-Nov-1954
Conditions for new evidence on appeal
At the trial, the wife of the appellant’s opponent said she had forgotten certain events. After the trial she began divorce proceedings, and informed the appellant that she now remembered. He sought either to appeal admitting fresh evidence, or for . .

Cited by:

CitedTodd (T/A Hygia Professional Training) v Cutter EAT 13-Jul-2007
EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Perversity
Appeal by Respondent based on an application for fresh evidence, which was clearly material and credible, but which did not satisfy the third Ladd v Marshall test . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 11 May 2022; Ref: scu.280482