EAT Disability Discrimination – Compensation
Judges:
The Honourable Mr Justice Charles
Citations:
EAT/901/99, [2001] UKEAT 901 – 99 – 0204
Links:
Citing:
See Also – British Telecommunications Plc v Wilding EAT 30-Jun-1999
. .
Cited – Payzu Limited v Saunders CA 1919
The innocent plaintiff buyers had been found to have failed to mitigate their damages because they had not accepted an offer from the defendant sellers (who were in breach of contract) to supply goods on cash terms, the contract having originally . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – Wilding v British Telecommunications Plc CA 19-Mar-2002
The employee challenged the Employment Tribunal’s finding, upheld by the EAT, that he had not acted reasonably in refusing an offer of re-employment made by his employer.
Held: The appeal failed. Potter LJ said: ‘As was made clear in the . .
See Also – British Telecommunications Plc v Wilding EAT 30-Jun-1999
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Discrimination, Damages
Updated: 06 June 2022; Ref: scu.172057
