Wild v Pensions Ombudsman: QBD 17 Apr 1996

Financial dependency on a deceased pension fund member not established by cohabitation only.
Times 17-Apr-1996
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedHillsdown Holdings plc v Pensions Ombudsman 1997
The court had to answer the question of whether the Pensions Ombudsman could make orders which the court could not.
Held: It could not, Knox J said: ‘there is a real distinction between ordering compensation for inconvenience and distress . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 21 July 2021; Ref: scu.90498