Watson v Huddleston: 1792

If a man in describing the date of a bond offers to state the year of the King as well as that of our Lord, and mentions as that of the King a year until which the King did not reign, the year of the King shall be considered as surplusage.

Citations:

[1792] EngR 2767, (1792) 1 Ld Raym 703, (1792) 91 ER 1369

Links:

Commonlii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Contract

Updated: 20 November 2022; Ref: scu.360979