Wasted Costs Order (No 5 of 1997): CACD 2 Sep 1999

Witness orders for the production of documents in the speculative hope that they might contain matters of assistance should be discouraged, and particularly so in respect of documents held by social services departments. This should now be well known and expected, and counsel breaking this rule should expect a wasted costs order.

Citations:

Times 02-Sep-1999

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedRegina v Reading Justices ex parte Berkshire County Council QBD 5-May-1995
Disclosure by third parties in criminal proceedings was not affected by other new rule. Simon Brown LJ summarised the tests for materiality for requiring production of dicuments from third parties by magistrates: ‘The central principles . . . are as . .
CitedIn re Ronald A Prior and Co (Solicitors) 1996
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Practice, Legal Professions

Updated: 25 October 2022; Ref: scu.90314