Vidal v Belgium: ECHR 22 Apr 1992

Hudoc Violation of Art. 6; Just satisfaction reserved

[1992] ECHR 47, [1992] ECHR 67, 12351/86
Worldlii, Worldlii, Bailii, Bailii
Human Rights
Citing:
See AlsoVidal v Belgium (Article50) ECHR 28-Oct-1992
Hudoc Judgment (Just satisfaction) Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses award – domestic proceedings; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention proceedings . .

Cited by:
CitedGreenfield, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department HL 16-Feb-2005
The appellant had been charged with and disciplined for a prison offence. He was refused legal assistance at his hearing, and it was accepted that the proceedings involved the determination of a criminal charge within the meaning of article 6 of the . .
See AlsoVidal v Belgium (Article50) ECHR 28-Oct-1992
Hudoc Judgment (Just satisfaction) Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses award – domestic proceedings; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention proceedings . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.165209