PC Guernsey (Appeal No.65 of 1997) The claimant company asserted that cheques drawn by a director in favour of his own company were for services which had not been delivered. He complained that a tape record of part of the a conversation with the defendant had not been admitted, and that three explanations of the additional charges were inconsistent.
Held: He had agreed to the approach taken by the court on the admission of the transcript, and the explanations of the additional sums charged were not explanations for the same sums, and were not therefore inconsistent. Appeal dismissed.
Judges:
Lord Browne-Wilkinson, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, Lord Nolan, Lord Clyde, Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough
Citations:
[1999] UKPC 53
Links:
Contract, Evidence
Updated: 01 June 2022; Ref: scu.159386
