Area of Freedom, Security and Justice : Judicial Cooperation In Criminal Matters : Opinion – Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Surrender procedures between Member States – Conditions for execution – Reasons for optional non-execution – Article 4a(1) introduced by Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA – Arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence or a detention order – ‘Trial resulting in the decision’ – Person concerned having appeared in person at first instance – Appeal proceedings involving a re-examination of the substance of the case – Arrest warrant providing no information making it possible to check whether the rights of the defence of the person convicted were upheld during the appeal proceedings
C-270/17, [2017] EUECJ C-270/17, [2017] WLR(D) 575
WLRD, Bailii
European
Cited by:
Cited – Konecny v District Court In Brno-Venkov, Czech Republic SC 27-Feb-2019
K had been convicted and sentenced in his absence. His extradition was requested under an EAW which asserted that it was based upon an enforceable judgment, but that he had an unqualified right to be retried. He argued that the delay (since 2004 for . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Extradition
Updated: 11 January 2022; Ref: scu.593573
