Tuohy and Others v Bell: CA 27 Mar 2002

The appellant challenged an order for his committal for contempt.
Lord Justice Kennedy, Neuberger J
[2002] EWCA Civ 423, [2002] 1 WLR 2703, [2002] 3 All ER 975, [2003] BPIR 749
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedABC and Others v CDE and Others QBD 3-Nov-2009
The first claimant sought committal of the first defendant for contempt of court, alleging breach of a freezing order, saying that the defendant had created a sham debt and repaid it.
Held: There had been no genuine loan agreement, and the . .
CitedHydropool Hot Tubs Ltd v Roberjot and Another ChD 4-Feb-2011
hydropool_roberjotChD11
The parties disputed ownership of a customer database. An interim order had been made prohibiting the defendants’ from its use pending trial. A mandatory order had been made for the disclosure of a list of contacts made, and the claimant complained . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 25 January 2021; Ref: scu.170035