Trippas v Trippas: CA 1973

The court emphasised the flexibility of the statutes providing for ancillary relief.


Scarman LJ


[1973] Fam 134


England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedMcFarlane v McFarlane; Parlour v Parlour CA 7-Jul-2004
Appeals were made against orders for periodical payments made against high earning husbands. The argument was that if the case of White had decided that capital should be distributed equally, the same should apply also to income.
Held: The . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.


Updated: 31 July 2022; Ref: scu.198594