Toth v Jarman: CA 21 Nov 2006

[2006] EWCA Civ 1625
England and Wales
See AlsoToth v Jarman CA 19-Jul-2006
The claimant appealed dismissal of his claim for damages for nervous shock, associated with the alleged negligence of the defendant doctor in treating his son. It was said that the medical expert had not disclosed a conflict of interest.
Held: . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 01 February 2021; Ref: scu.246991