The applicants had arrived in the UK as minors fleeing Afghanistan. They now challenged grant of a discretionary leave to remain limited to expire withiin one year.
Maurice Kay VP, Beatson, Briggs LJJ
[2013] EWCA Civ 1609, [2013] WLR(D) 483, [2014] INLR 542, [2014] 1 WLR 2095, [2014] 2 CMLR 31
Bailii, WLRD
Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 83, Directive 2003/9/EC
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal from – TN v Secretary of State for The Home Department Admn 16-Dec-2011
‘The claimant, an unaccompanied child, challenges the Secretary of State’s decision of 12 November 2010 refusing his claim for asylum and for humanitarian protection and granting him discretionary leave to remain in the United Kingdom for a shorter . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for The Home Department SC 24-Jun-2015
The appellants, children from Afghanistan whose asylum claims had been rejected, challenged the sufficiency of the appellate process, and the respondents obligations for family tracing.
Held: The appeals failed. An applicant could not claim, . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Immigration, Children
Updated: 26 November 2021; Ref: scu.518937
