Tip-TopCom Ltd v Salvus Technology Limited (Patent): IPO 16 May 2013

IPO This decision relates to costs in revocation proceedings. In an earlier decision (BL/0326/12), the hearing officer found the claims as granted to be invalid for lack of novelty. However, revocation was subsequently avoided by amendment under section 75. The claimants were found to be entitled to an award of costs in line with the standard scale.

P Slater
[2013] UKIntelP o20713, O/207/13
Bailii
Patents Act 1977 72

Intellectual Property

Updated: 14 November 2021; Ref: scu.511210